RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    2008 기업의 소송위험과 그 대응방안 = 2008 Enterprises' Litigation Risks and Its Counter Measures

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101614993

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    After the economic crisis in 1997, the Korean government widely opened the financial market to foreign countries abolishing or amending some restrictions on foreign investments and took a series of structural reform measures to improve the standard of corporate governance and to enhance corporate management. In a nutshell, we have experienced many changes after the economic crisis. Some of the changes are very much helpful for the Korean financial market, but some are not helpful or even painful for the Korean financial market from the perspective of the domestic companies. For example, the opening of financial market caused confusion in the Korean financial market, which had not had competitive power under the governmental governing system. Since that reason, we have faced with so called the "Sovereign Case," which the foreign investment fund acquired the very much profits from the domestic companies and dumped the domestic companies when the foreign investment fund decided that there were no more benefits of the domestic companies.
    One more example of the changes is increasing litigations against the domestic enterprises that caused from the change of the corporate governance in Korean enterprises under the Amendment of the Korean Commercial Code. Since the litigations against the enterprises may cause the serious managemental loss, it may also causes the uneven balance of the Korean financial market. With this reason the Article analyses the changes of Korean enterprises' managemental environment and the enterprise litigation risks which would be caused from the changes and proposes some counter measures against the enterprise litigation risks in order to improve the enterprises' managemental circumstances.
    번역하기

    After the economic crisis in 1997, the Korean government widely opened the financial market to foreign countries abolishing or amending some restrictions on foreign investments and took a series of structural reform measures to improve the standard of...

    After the economic crisis in 1997, the Korean government widely opened the financial market to foreign countries abolishing or amending some restrictions on foreign investments and took a series of structural reform measures to improve the standard of corporate governance and to enhance corporate management. In a nutshell, we have experienced many changes after the economic crisis. Some of the changes are very much helpful for the Korean financial market, but some are not helpful or even painful for the Korean financial market from the perspective of the domestic companies. For example, the opening of financial market caused confusion in the Korean financial market, which had not had competitive power under the governmental governing system. Since that reason, we have faced with so called the "Sovereign Case," which the foreign investment fund acquired the very much profits from the domestic companies and dumped the domestic companies when the foreign investment fund decided that there were no more benefits of the domestic companies.
    One more example of the changes is increasing litigations against the domestic enterprises that caused from the change of the corporate governance in Korean enterprises under the Amendment of the Korean Commercial Code. Since the litigations against the enterprises may cause the serious managemental loss, it may also causes the uneven balance of the Korean financial market. With this reason the Article analyses the changes of Korean enterprises' managemental environment and the enterprise litigation risks which would be caused from the changes and proposes some counter measures against the enterprise litigation risks in order to improve the enterprises' managemental circumstances.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 신원철, "창업자집단소송에 대비하라"

    2 고인묵, "증권집단소송제도와 회계인프라의 정비방향"

    3 김광록, "증권집단소송의 이론과 실제" 자유기업원 2005

    4 전삼현, "증권집단소송 ISSUE 시리즈4, “국내분식회계 과련 사례 및 시사점”"

    5 이준섭, "증권관련집단소송제의 전제조건으로서의 손해배상책임제도의 정비방안 in:전경련 세미나 자료집" 2004

    6 전삼현, "소비자기본법상의 집단분쟁조정제도에 관한 소고" 한국상사법학회 26 (26): 253-273, 2007

    7 전강삼, "소비자 집단소송제 도입 추진"

    8 양승규, "상법개정공청회"

    9 한국상장회사협의회, "사외이사의 독립성 및 전문성 제고방안 - 한국기업지배구조개선지원센터 연구"

    10 법원행정처, "사법연감 2002-2005년"

    1 신원철, "창업자집단소송에 대비하라"

    2 고인묵, "증권집단소송제도와 회계인프라의 정비방향"

    3 김광록, "증권집단소송의 이론과 실제" 자유기업원 2005

    4 전삼현, "증권집단소송 ISSUE 시리즈4, “국내분식회계 과련 사례 및 시사점”"

    5 이준섭, "증권관련집단소송제의 전제조건으로서의 손해배상책임제도의 정비방안 in:전경련 세미나 자료집" 2004

    6 전삼현, "소비자기본법상의 집단분쟁조정제도에 관한 소고" 한국상사법학회 26 (26): 253-273, 2007

    7 전강삼, "소비자 집단소송제 도입 추진"

    8 양승규, "상법개정공청회"

    9 한국상장회사협의회, "사외이사의 독립성 및 전문성 제고방안 - 한국기업지배구조개선지원센터 연구"

    10 법원행정처, "사법연감 2002-2005년"

    11 조성훈, "비국자본시장규제위원회(CCMR)중간보고서 주요내용 및 시사점"

    12 보험개발원, "보험통계연감 2001-2007년"

    13 장시형, "끊이지 않는 특허소송 IT업계 기술 베끼기에 ‘몸살’" 2008

    14 김광록, "기업의 소송위험에 대한 대응책에 관한 연구" 한국기업법학회 19 (19): 231-260, 2005

    15 대한상공회의소, "기업의 소송리스크 전망과 정책대응과제"

    16 Buckberg, Elaine, "Recent Trends in Shareholder Class Action Litigation: Are WorldCom and Enron the New Standard?" NERA Economic Consulting 2005

    17 Laura E. Simmons, "Post-Reform Act Securities Settlements: 2005 Review and Analysis"

    18 CCMR, "Interim Report of the Committee on Capital Markets Regulation"

    19 "Cendant Corp. Agree to Record Payment to Settle All Financial Fraud Allegations"

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2017-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.74 0.74 0.67
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.59 0.53 0.667 0.39
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼