RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재 SCOPUS

    회계정보의 가치관련성에 대한 결정요인 = Determinants of The Value Relevance of Accounting Information

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A95951663

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper examines whether investors interpret value-related accounting information differently when assessing stock prices. The value relevance of accounting information has been considered an important area of accounting research since the introduction of capital market based accounting research by Ball and Brown (1968). Value relevance studies examine the usefulness of accounting information by considering the contemporaneous relationship between accounting information and the stock price. More specifically, these studies examine the usefulness of main items of financial statements by examining the size of R2 and the importance of regression coefficients from the information perspective (Barth et al. 1998; Collins et al. 1999; Francis and Schipper 1999). However, these studies typically assume market efficiency, firm characteristics and surrounding factors are assumed as independent when evaluating stock prices because these factors reflect idiosyncratic risks. Recently, inconsistent with the efficient market hypothesis (EMH), there have been frequent reports of market anomalies, and thus, there has been a need for examining the value relevance from the measurement perspective. If a market is not efficient, then there exist information asymmetry and different levels of rationality among investors, which in turn can lead to different results for the same piece of information(Black 1986; Merton 1987). For these reasons, this study analyzed relative usefulness of the accounting information through the relationship of between the value relevance of accounting information and various determinants(firm characteristics, ownership structure by the investor types and disclosure quality) from the measurement perspective without assumption of the efficient market. we calculated the quantitative measures(ACCRSQ) to evaluate the strength of the contemporaneous relationship between accounting information and stock prices by following the methodology of Frankel et al(2006). then We analyzed whether the value relevance of accounting information(ACCRSQ) would vary according to various determinants(firm characteristics, ownership structure by the investor types, disclosure quality). Additionally, total sample is divided into three types of industries-Low tech manufacturing, High tech manufacturing, Service industry- according to the influence of intangible asset, and differences between them on degree and determinants of value relevance are analysed. We analyzed the determinants to affect at the extent to which stock prices was reflected accounting information for 2,861 firm-year sample listed on Korean stock for the 2005-2009 period. In addition, for comparing the effects of the financial crisis on the value relevance of accounting information, we divided these firms into 1,643 pre-crisis (2005-2007) firms and 1,167 post-crisis (2008-2009) firms. we ran the fixed effects regression by including year dummies and the separate regression to control for heteroskedasticity by year. Specially, the separate regression model was interpret the results with the average coefficient for each year and Statistical Significance was verified by using Newey-West`s(1987) Adjusted statistics (Fama and Macbeth 1973; Barth et al. 2001; Frankel et al. 2006). The results of the study are summarized as follows. Firstly, on the analysis of the degree that firm characteristic factors affect the value relevance, when profitability, risk, firm size, and market synchronicity increase, the degree of that accounting information is reflected in stock price increase. On the other hand, the liquidity and growth possibility is higher, the value relevance of accounting information is lower. These show that investors decide differently the degree of accounting information reflected in stock price according to the firm characteristics because they interpret the relative importance between accounting information and non-accounting information differently by firm characteristics. Secondly, in the analysis of the relationship between the ownership structure by investor types and ACCRSQ, the ownership of institutional and foreign investors does not show the meaningful relationship with ACCRSQ, on the other hand, the ownership of small investors shows the negative relationship with ACCRSQ. This means that the trading of small investors increase, the value relevance of accounting information decease, because they could not use accounting information in an analytical manner. Thirdly, on the result of that the quality of disclosure and information asymmetry have an effect on value relevance, ACCRSQ shows a positive relationship with the absolute value of discretionary accruals. This can be interpreted that investors tend to increase the weight of that accounting information of the firm with less adverse selection costs is reflected in stock price. Finally, this study also analyse whether the value relevance of accounting information is different by industry type. In service industry, in which the value of intangible assets is not sufficiently reflected in accounting information, the value relevance of accounting information is lower than that of other industries, and determinants of the value relevance fluctuate considerably by the market condition of bull and bear markets. On the other hand, for the Low-tech manufacturing industry with less value of intangible asset, the value relevance of accounting information is the most high. In addition, the fluctuation of determinants of the value relevance is lowest in High-tech manufacturing industry. These show that the weight of intangible asset, not recognized in financial statement, is higher, the value relevance of accounting firm could be lower.
    번역하기

    This paper examines whether investors interpret value-related accounting information differently when assessing stock prices. The value relevance of accounting information has been considered an important area of accounting research since the introduc...

    This paper examines whether investors interpret value-related accounting information differently when assessing stock prices. The value relevance of accounting information has been considered an important area of accounting research since the introduction of capital market based accounting research by Ball and Brown (1968). Value relevance studies examine the usefulness of accounting information by considering the contemporaneous relationship between accounting information and the stock price. More specifically, these studies examine the usefulness of main items of financial statements by examining the size of R2 and the importance of regression coefficients from the information perspective (Barth et al. 1998; Collins et al. 1999; Francis and Schipper 1999). However, these studies typically assume market efficiency, firm characteristics and surrounding factors are assumed as independent when evaluating stock prices because these factors reflect idiosyncratic risks. Recently, inconsistent with the efficient market hypothesis (EMH), there have been frequent reports of market anomalies, and thus, there has been a need for examining the value relevance from the measurement perspective. If a market is not efficient, then there exist information asymmetry and different levels of rationality among investors, which in turn can lead to different results for the same piece of information(Black 1986; Merton 1987). For these reasons, this study analyzed relative usefulness of the accounting information through the relationship of between the value relevance of accounting information and various determinants(firm characteristics, ownership structure by the investor types and disclosure quality) from the measurement perspective without assumption of the efficient market. we calculated the quantitative measures(ACCRSQ) to evaluate the strength of the contemporaneous relationship between accounting information and stock prices by following the methodology of Frankel et al(2006). then We analyzed whether the value relevance of accounting information(ACCRSQ) would vary according to various determinants(firm characteristics, ownership structure by the investor types, disclosure quality). Additionally, total sample is divided into three types of industries-Low tech manufacturing, High tech manufacturing, Service industry- according to the influence of intangible asset, and differences between them on degree and determinants of value relevance are analysed. We analyzed the determinants to affect at the extent to which stock prices was reflected accounting information for 2,861 firm-year sample listed on Korean stock for the 2005-2009 period. In addition, for comparing the effects of the financial crisis on the value relevance of accounting information, we divided these firms into 1,643 pre-crisis (2005-2007) firms and 1,167 post-crisis (2008-2009) firms. we ran the fixed effects regression by including year dummies and the separate regression to control for heteroskedasticity by year. Specially, the separate regression model was interpret the results with the average coefficient for each year and Statistical Significance was verified by using Newey-West`s(1987) Adjusted statistics (Fama and Macbeth 1973; Barth et al. 2001; Frankel et al. 2006). The results of the study are summarized as follows. Firstly, on the analysis of the degree that firm characteristic factors affect the value relevance, when profitability, risk, firm size, and market synchronicity increase, the degree of that accounting information is reflected in stock price increase. On the other hand, the liquidity and growth possibility is higher, the value relevance of accounting information is lower. These show that investors decide differently the degree of accounting information reflected in stock price according to the firm characteristics because they interpret the relative importance between accounting information and non-accounting information differently by firm characteristics. Secondly, in the analysis of the relationship between the ownership structure by investor types and ACCRSQ, the ownership of institutional and foreign investors does not show the meaningful relationship with ACCRSQ, on the other hand, the ownership of small investors shows the negative relationship with ACCRSQ. This means that the trading of small investors increase, the value relevance of accounting information decease, because they could not use accounting information in an analytical manner. Thirdly, on the result of that the quality of disclosure and information asymmetry have an effect on value relevance, ACCRSQ shows a positive relationship with the absolute value of discretionary accruals. This can be interpreted that investors tend to increase the weight of that accounting information of the firm with less adverse selection costs is reflected in stock price. Finally, this study also analyse whether the value relevance of accounting information is different by industry type. In service industry, in which the value of intangible assets is not sufficiently reflected in accounting information, the value relevance of accounting information is lower than that of other industries, and determinants of the value relevance fluctuate considerably by the market condition of bull and bear markets. On the other hand, for the Low-tech manufacturing industry with less value of intangible asset, the value relevance of accounting information is the most high. In addition, the fluctuation of determinants of the value relevance is lowest in High-tech manufacturing industry. These show that the weight of intangible asset, not recognized in financial statement, is higher, the value relevance of accounting firm could be lower.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박진우, "주식분할 후 변동성 증가와 거래행태의 변화" 한국증권학회 39 (39): 545-571, 2010

    2 정석우, "재무분석가의 분석기업 결정과 예측특성에 영향을 미치는 요인" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 61-84, 2003

    3 김지홍, "재무분석가수의 결정요인: IBES를 이용한 분석" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 31-54, 2003

    4 최관, "경제위기가 회계정보의 가치관련성에 미친 영향" 한국회계학회 19 (19): 83-110, 2010

    5 Kang. J. K, "Why is there a Home Bias? An Analysis of Foreign Portfolio Equity Ownership in Japan" 46 : 3-28, 1997

    6 Kwon. S. Y, "Usefulness of Accounting Information in Financial Marke" Shinyoungsa 2010

    7 Brown. S, "Use of in Accounting Research: Measuring Changes in Value Relevance over the Last Four Decades" 28 : 83-115, 1999

    8 Kim. O, "Trading volume and price reaction to public announcement" 29 : 302-321, 1991

    9 Xie.H, "The mispricing of abnormal accruals" 76 : 357-373, 2001

    10 Beaver.W, "The information content of annual earnings announcements" 6 : 67-92, 1968

    1 박진우, "주식분할 후 변동성 증가와 거래행태의 변화" 한국증권학회 39 (39): 545-571, 2010

    2 정석우, "재무분석가의 분석기업 결정과 예측특성에 영향을 미치는 요인" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 61-84, 2003

    3 김지홍, "재무분석가수의 결정요인: IBES를 이용한 분석" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 31-54, 2003

    4 최관, "경제위기가 회계정보의 가치관련성에 미친 영향" 한국회계학회 19 (19): 83-110, 2010

    5 Kang. J. K, "Why is there a Home Bias? An Analysis of Foreign Portfolio Equity Ownership in Japan" 46 : 3-28, 1997

    6 Kwon. S. Y, "Usefulness of Accounting Information in Financial Marke" Shinyoungsa 2010

    7 Brown. S, "Use of in Accounting Research: Measuring Changes in Value Relevance over the Last Four Decades" 28 : 83-115, 1999

    8 Kim. O, "Trading volume and price reaction to public announcement" 29 : 302-321, 1991

    9 Xie.H, "The mispricing of abnormal accruals" 76 : 357-373, 2001

    10 Beaver.W, "The information content of annual earnings announcements" 6 : 67-92, 1968

    11 Banz.R, "The Relationship between Return and Market Value of Common Stocks" (March) : 3-18, 1981

    12 Subramanyam.K, "The Pricing of Discretionary Accruals" 22 : 249-281, 1996

    13 Hayn.C, "The Information Content of Losses" 20 : 125-153, 1995

    14 Fama. E, "The Cross-section of Expected Stock Returns" 47 : 427-465, 1992

    15 Chen. C, "Small trades and volatility increases after stock splits" 18 : 592-610, 2009

    16 Barth. M, "Revalued Financial, Tangible, and Intangible Asset: Associations with Share Price and Non-Market-Based Value Estimates" 36 : 199-233, 1998

    17 Jegadeesh. N, "Returns to Buying Winners and Selling Losers: Implications for Stock Market Efficiency" 48 : 65-91, 1993

    18 Ali. A, "Residual-Income-Based Valuation Predict Future Stock Returns: Evidence on Mispricing vs Risk Explanations" 78 : 377-396, 2003

    19 Baginski. S, "Residual Income Risk, Intrinsic Values and Share Prices" 78 : 327-351, 2003

    20 Barth. M, "Relative Valuation Roles of Equity Book Value and Net Income as a Function of Financial Health" 25 : 1-34, 1998

    21 Black.F, "Presidential address: Noise" 41 : 529-543, 1986

    22 Core. J., "Market Valuation in the New Economy: An Investigation of What Has Changed" 34 : 43-67, 2003

    23 Lee.C, "Market Efficiency and Accounting Research: A Discussion of ‘Capital Market Research in Accounting’" 31 : 233-253, 2001

    24 Brennan. M, "Investment analysis and price formation in securities markets" 38 : 361-381, 1995

    25 Brown. S, "How Disclosure Quality Affects the Level of Information Asymmetry" 12 : 443-477, 2007

    26 Francis. J, "Have Financial Statements Lost Their Relevance" 37 : 319-352, 1999

    27 Bhushan. R, "Firm characteristics and analyst following" 11 : 255-274, 1989

    28 Barth.M, "Fair value accounting: evidence from investment securities and the market valuation of banks" 69 : 1-25, 1994

    29 Collins. D, "Equity Valuation and Negative Earnings: The Role of Book Value of Equity" 74 : 29-61, 1999

    30 Bhojraj. S, "Effect of corporate governance on bond ratings and yields: The role of institutional investors and outside directors" 76 : 455-475, 2003

    31 Ohlson. J, "Earnings, Book Value, and Dividends in Equity Valuation" 11 : 661-687, 1995

    32 Aboody. D, "Earnings Quality, Insider Trading, and Cost of Capital" 43 : 651-673, 2005

    33 Burgstahler. D, "Earning, Adaptation and Equity Value" 72 : 187-215, 1997

    34 DeBondt. W, "Dose the Stock Market Overreact" 40 : 793-805, 1985

    35 Durnev. A, "Does greater firm-specific return variation mean more or less informed stock pricing" 41 : 797-836, 2003

    36 Sloan.R, "Do Stock Prices Fully Reflect Information in Accruals and Cash Flows about Future Earnings" 71 : 289-316, 1996

    37 Francis. J, "Disclosure Incentives and Effects on Cost of Capital around the World" 80 : 1125-1162, 2005

    38 Kandel. E, "Differential interpretation of public signals and trade in speculative markets" 103 : 831-853, 1995

    39 Kim. K, "Determinants of the Analyst Coverage and the Role of Analysts in the Korea Stock Market: Information Provider versus Information Intermediary)" Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Working Paper 2011

    40 Frankel. R, "Determinants of informativeness of analyst research" 41 : 29-54, 2006

    41 Dechow. P. M, "Detecting Earnings Management" 70 (70): 193-225, 1995

    42 DeFond. M, "Debt Covent Violation and Manipulation of Accruals" 17 : 145-176, 1994

    43 Desai. A. S, "Changes in trading activity following stock splits and their effect on volatility and the adverse information component of the bid-ask spread" 67 : 429-450, 1998

    44 Collins. D., "Changes in the Value-Relevance of Earning and Book Values over the Past Forty Years" 24 : 39-67, 1997

    45 Kothari.S.P, "Capital Markets Research in Accounting" 31 : 105-231, 2001

    46 Barth. M, "Brand Value and Capital Market Valuation" 3 : 41-68, 1998

    47 Barber. B, "Boys will be boys: gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment" (February) : 261-292, 2001

    48 Hong. H, "Bad news travels slowly: Size, analyst coverage and the profitability of momentum strategies" 55 : 265-295, 2000

    49 Odean. T, "Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses" 53 : 1775-1798, 1998

    50 Barth. M, "Analyst earnings forecast revisions and the pricing of accruals" 9 : 59-96, 2004

    51 Barth. M, "Analyst Coverage and Intangible Assets" 39 : 1-34, 2001

    52 Ball. R, "An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers" 6 : 159-178, 1968

    53 Grullon. G., "Advertising, Breadth of Ownership and Liquidity" 17 (17): 439-461, 2004

    54 Frankel. R, "Accounting Valuation, Market Expectation, and Cross-sectional Stock Returns" 25 : 283-319, 1998

    55 Merton.R.C., "A simple model of capital market equilibrium with incomplete information" 42 : 483-510, 1987

    56 Newey. W. K, "A Simple, Positive Semi-definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix" 55 : 703-708, 1987

    57 Botosan. C, "A Re-examination of Disclosure Level and the Expected cost of Equity Capital" 40 : 21-40, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2020 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2015-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.96 1.96 2.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    2.65 2.74 5.829 0.22
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼