“교리설교”의 수사적 의미와 과제

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본고는 “교리설교”를 하나의 설교유형이 아니라 교리와 설교가 처한 현대적 상황을 드러내고 그 의의와 방향을 논의토록 촉구하는 메타설교적 중복어(pleonasm)로 이해한다. “교리설교”는 교리와 설교의 본래적 기능과 양자의 관계를 환기시키면서 동시에 그 본래적 기능과 관계를 수용하지 않으려는 현대적 상황의 심각성을 나타내는 수사적 수단이다. 교리와 설교는 본래 분리될 수 없는 동체로서 교리가 없는 설교는 맹목이고 설교가 없는 교리는 공허하다는 것이 본고의 중심전제이다. 이는 신약언어의 쓰임새 분석과 교리를 명제, 경험, 문화-언어 측면으로 이해할 때 지지된다. 그럼에도 양자의 불가분리성을 거부하는 현대적 경향은 근대주의와 탈근대주의 사조들의 일반적 특징으로부터 지지된다. 즉 종교로부터 보편적 진리주장을 박탈하려는 근대주의적 세속주의와 거대서사와 지식의 객관성을 부정하는 탈근대주의의 결정론적 상대주의가 그것이다. 요컨대 현대적 특성은 수사적 성향이다. “교리설교”는 이 같은 상황 속에서 어떻게 교리와 설교를 본래적 관계와 기능으로 회복시킬 것인가를 과제화한다. 이 과제가 어려운 이유는 현대 청중은 교리기피를 정당화하는 이론도구를 공급받으면서 설교자와의 갈등을 파편적 정보획득으로 해소하기 때문이다. 이에 대한 “교리설교”의 전략은 교리-설교의 수사성을 인정함으로 현대적 비판에 개방되는 한편, 말씀과 실재를 동일시하는 기독교전통에 의거 교리와 설교의 비수사적 차원을 명시하는 것이다. 이와 관련하여 하나의 수사적 행위로서 그리고 실재인 말씀을 지시하는 상징행위로서 “교리설교”는 현대적 상황에 대한 수사비판을 실행할 수 있다. 방법론적으로 “교리설교”는 청중의 참여를 존중한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article understands “doctrinal sermon” not as a sermonic type but as a meta-sermonic pleonasm to divulge contemporary situations, in which doctrine and sermon are placed, and to demand to explicate their significances and directions. “Doctrinal sermon” is a rhetorical means to call to attention the original functions and relations of doctrine and preaching, and to explore the critical state of the contemporary circumstances tending not to accept the original functions and relations. Doctrine and sermon are originally a one body not to be separated from each other so that a sermon without doctrine is blind and a doctrine without sermon is void. This is the core assumption of the article. It is supported by the New Testament’s usages and the understandings of doctrine as proposition, experience, and culture-language. The contemporary tendency, nonetheless, to deny the inseparability of them is prompted by the general characteristics of modernistic and postmodernistic thoughts. These are the modernistic secularism, which is to deprive religion of its universal truth claim, and the postmodernistic deterministic relativism, which is to negate meta-narratives and the objectivity of knowledge. In sum, the contemporary traits are characterized by the rhetorical inclination. “Doctrinal sermon” takes over the task how to restore the original functions and relations of doctrine and sermon in such conditions. The reason this task is difficult to achieve is that today’s audience is provided with theoretical tools by which to justify its evading doctrines, on the one hand, and that it resolves its conflict with the preacher by focusing on fragmental informations, on the other. The strategies of “doctrinal sermon” against the situations is to open itself to contemporary criticisms by acknowledging the rhetorical limit of doctrine and sermon, one the one hand, and to clarify the non-rhetorical dimension of doctrine and sermon, relying on the Christian tradition that identifies the Word and reality. In addition, “doctrinal sermon” as a rhetorical act to be restricted by the humans language and as a symbolic action to point to the Word as reality can perform the function of rhetorical criticism. Methodologically, “doctrinal sermon” respects the participation of the audience.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 초록
• I. 들어가는 말
• II. 교리와 설교
• III. 교리를 거부하는 현상과 “교리설교”의 등장
• IV. “교리설교”의 실천적 문제
• V. “교리설교”의 수사적 과제와 비수사적 과제
• VI. 나가는 말
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조한상, "조나단 에드워즈의 『신앙 감정론』에 나타난 영적분별" 한국실천신학회 (44) : 255-278, 2015

2 윤성민, "정치적 설교 - 독일 설교학을 중심으로 -" 한국실천신학회 (47) : 117-143, 2015

3 김찬규, "왜 상담설교 인가? - 상담설교의 수립을 중심하여 -" 한국실천신학회 (48) : 91-115, 2016

4 주연수, "실천신학의 학문적 발달에 대한 고찰과 포스트모던 상황에서의 방향성 모색" 한국실천신학회 (42) : 7-36, 2014

5 이승진, "반전의 깨달음을 위한 설교 플롯에 관한 연구" 한국실천신학회 (46) : 117-145, 2015

6 Randall, Ian, "What a Friend We Have in Jesus: The Evangelical Tradition" Cambridge Scholars 2005

7 Pullman, George, "What Is the New Rhetoric?" Cambridge Scholars 16-28, 2007

8 Brown, Dale W., "Understanding Pietism" Evangel Publishing House 1996

9 Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty, "Translator’s preface to Of Grammatology" Johns Hopkins Unversity 1997

10 James, William, "The Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature" Masterlab 2014

11 Bizzel, Patricia, "The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present" Bedford/St. Martin’s 2001

12 Sellnow, Deanna D., "The Rhetorical Power of Popular Culture: Considering Mediated Texts" Sage 2010

13 Campbell, Karlyn Kohors, "The Rhetorical Act" Wadsworth 1982

14 Davis, Philip J., "The Rhetoric of the Human Sciences: Language and Argument in Scholarship and Public Affair" University of Wisconsin 53-68, 1987

15 Booth, Wayne C., "The Rhetoric of Fiction" University of Chicago 1983

16 Weber, Max, "The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism" Roxbury 1998

17 Lyotard, Jean-François, "The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge" University Of Minnesota 1984

18 Perelman, Chaim, "The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation" University of Notre Dame 1969

19 Lindbeck, George A., "The Nature of Doctrine: Religion and Theology in a Postliberal Age" Westminster 1984

20 White, Barrington R., "The English Separatist Tradition" Oxford University Press 1971

21 Blakesley, David, "The Elements of Dramatism" Longman 2002

22 Harvey, David, "The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change" Blackwell 1990

23 Schleiermacher, Friedrich, "The Christian Faith" T&T Clark 1989

24 Bloom, Harold, "The American Religion: The Emergence of the Post-Christian Nation" Simon & Schuster 1992

25 Derrida, Jacques, "Speech and Phenomena: And Other Essays on Husserl's Theory of Signs" Northwestern University 1973

26 Baudrillard, Jean, "Simulations" Semiotext 1983

27 Foss, Sonja K., "Rhetorical Criticism: Exploration and Practice" Waveland 2009

28 Conley, Thomas M., "Rhetoric in the European Tradition" University of Chicago 1990

29 Smith, Craig R., "Rhetoric and Human Consciousness: A History" Waveland 2009

30 Edwards, Jonathan, "Religious Affections" Yale University 1959

31 Troeltsch, Ernest, "Religion in History" Fortress 1991

32 Reuther, Rosemary Radford, "Readings in Modern Theology: Britain and America" Abingdon 69-73, 1995

33 Carl, William J. III., "Preaching Christian Doctrine" Fortress 1984

34 Martin, David, "On Secularization: Towards a Revised General Theory" Ashgate 2005

35 Dabney, R. L., "On Secular Education" Canon 2008

36 Habermas, Jürgen, "Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason" 1987

37 Burke, Kenneth, "Language as Symbolic Action: Essays on Life, Liturature, and Method" Universtiy of California 1966

38 Weaver, Richard M., "Language Is Sermonic: Richard M. Weaver on the Nature of Rhetoric" Louisiana State University 1970

39 Rouse, Joseph, "Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science" Cornell University 1987

40 Baudrillard, Jean, "Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings" Polity 1988

41 Ebeling, Gerhard, "Introduction to a Theological Theory of Language" Fortress 1973

42 Hauser, General A., "Introduction to Rhetorical Theory" Waveland 2002

43 Smith, Robert, Jr., "Doctrine That Dances: Bringing Doctrinal Preaching and Teaching to Life" Academic 2008

44 Derrida, Jacques, "Derrida and Différance" Northwestern University 1988

45 Lucaites, John Louis, "Contemporay Rhetorical Theory: A Reader" Guilford 1999

46 Baudrillard, Jean, "Contemporary Perspective on Rhetoric" Waveland 209-, 2014

47 Freud, Sigmund, "Civilization and its Discontents" Norton 1989

48 Allen, Diogenes, "Christian Belief in A Postmodern World: The Full Wealth of Conviction" W/JKP 1989

49 Carr, Nicholas, "Author Nicholas Carr: The Web Shatters Focus, Rewires Brains"

50 Foucault, Michel, "Archaeology of Knowledge and The Discourse on Language" Pantheon 1972

51 Postman, Neil, "Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business" Penguin 2005

52 Steiner, George, "After Babel: Aspects of Language and Translation" Oxford University 1998

53 Burke, Kenneth, "A Rhetoric of Motives" University of California 1969

54 Edwards, O. C. Jr., "A History of Preaching" Abingdon 2004

55 Burke, Kenneth, "A Grammar of Motives" University of California 1969