RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Conquering the "last frontier": Gentrification, public housing and the limits of New Urbanism in the central city (Illinois).

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T10585938

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This dissertation scrutinizes the physical redevelopment of America's most distressed public housing complexes under the federal HOPE VI program. Using Chicago's Cabrini-Green complex as a case study, this dissertation situates the redevelopment of public housing within its larger economic, political, cultural and architectural context, and unearths the broader significance of such changes in federal housing policy on Chicago's changing urban terrain. The primary argument put forth is that, despite rhetoric to the contrary, the redevelopment of Cabrini-Green orchestrated under HOPE VI was mostly about recovering a remarkably deep “rent gap” in Chicago's Central Area. During the 1980s and 1990s, changes in Chicago's economy, along with an associated intensification of the gentrification process, swiftly converted Cabrini-Green into an almost incomparable anomaly where public housing occupied a prime parcel of real estate in one of the most dynamic urban land markets in the United States.
    This particular context informed and structured the shape of the redevelopment efforts. At Cabrini-Green, as in other HOPE VI redevelopment efforts, a New Urbanist model of low-rise and mixed-income townhouses was used to address the problems associated with the “concentrated poverty” exhibited by modernist high-rise public housing towers. This New Urbanist model, however, necessitated the displacement of many public housing households and destroyed nearly 600 units of subsidized housing from Chicago's diminishing affordable residential stock. The ultimate result was the creation of new “ghettos” on the far periphery of the central city—what I call “third ghettos”—that rather paradoxically recreate many of the social and economic problems associated with the concentrated-poverty of the much-maligned high-rises.
    번역하기

    This dissertation scrutinizes the physical redevelopment of America's most distressed public housing complexes under the federal HOPE VI program. Using Chicago's Cabrini-Green complex as a case study, this dissertation situates the redevelopment of p...

    This dissertation scrutinizes the physical redevelopment of America's most distressed public housing complexes under the federal HOPE VI program. Using Chicago's Cabrini-Green complex as a case study, this dissertation situates the redevelopment of public housing within its larger economic, political, cultural and architectural context, and unearths the broader significance of such changes in federal housing policy on Chicago's changing urban terrain. The primary argument put forth is that, despite rhetoric to the contrary, the redevelopment of Cabrini-Green orchestrated under HOPE VI was mostly about recovering a remarkably deep “rent gap” in Chicago's Central Area. During the 1980s and 1990s, changes in Chicago's economy, along with an associated intensification of the gentrification process, swiftly converted Cabrini-Green into an almost incomparable anomaly where public housing occupied a prime parcel of real estate in one of the most dynamic urban land markets in the United States.
    This particular context informed and structured the shape of the redevelopment efforts. At Cabrini-Green, as in other HOPE VI redevelopment efforts, a New Urbanist model of low-rise and mixed-income townhouses was used to address the problems associated with the “concentrated poverty” exhibited by modernist high-rise public housing towers. This New Urbanist model, however, necessitated the displacement of many public housing households and destroyed nearly 600 units of subsidized housing from Chicago's diminishing affordable residential stock. The ultimate result was the creation of new “ghettos” on the far periphery of the central city—what I call “third ghettos”—that rather paradoxically recreate many of the social and economic problems associated with the concentrated-poverty of the much-maligned high-rises.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼