RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      재생골재를 사용한 구조용 콘크리트의 성능평가 = Performance Evaluation of Structural Concrete Using Recycled Aggregate

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104827068

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In the past, recycled aggregate was used very limitedly in low valueadded areas such as the base layer of roads. However, in response to the shortage of natural aggregate, high consciousness of resource saving and changed idea on environment, the quality of recycled aggregate has been improved considerably, and the percentage of recycled construction waste is increasing every year compared to simple landfill or incineration. Recently the Act on the Promotion of Construction Waste Recycling was enacted on December 2003 for the efficient use of recycled aggregate, and the Standards for the Quality of Recycled Aggregate for Concrete (Proposal) were announced in order to use and manage recycled aggregate according to quality.According to the Standards for the Quality of Recycled Aggregate for Concrete (Proposal), it is recommended to substitute recycled coarse aggregate and fine aggregate below 30% each. However, compared to the trend of recycling, the recycling rate of aggregate is still quite low. It is because of low performance of recycled aggregate, users’ lack of understanding, etc. These problems basically come from the decrease of strength of recycled concrete resulting from the use of recycled aggregate, and recycled aggregate is still considered not reliable because there have been not many cases of actual application. If the basic problem of strength decrease is solved and data on recycled aggregate is provided through actual field placing, we may maximize the use of recycled aggregate.Thus, in order to maximize the use of recycled aggregate that satisfy the recycled aggregate quality standards, the present study made a mock-up similar to real structures, evaluated its performance and examined the field applicability of recycled aggregate concrete.
      번역하기

      In the past, recycled aggregate was used very limitedly in low valueadded areas such as the base layer of roads. However, in response to the shortage of natural aggregate, high consciousness of resource saving and changed idea on environment, the qual...

      In the past, recycled aggregate was used very limitedly in low valueadded areas such as the base layer of roads. However, in response to the shortage of natural aggregate, high consciousness of resource saving and changed idea on environment, the quality of recycled aggregate has been improved considerably, and the percentage of recycled construction waste is increasing every year compared to simple landfill or incineration. Recently the Act on the Promotion of Construction Waste Recycling was enacted on December 2003 for the efficient use of recycled aggregate, and the Standards for the Quality of Recycled Aggregate for Concrete (Proposal) were announced in order to use and manage recycled aggregate according to quality.According to the Standards for the Quality of Recycled Aggregate for Concrete (Proposal), it is recommended to substitute recycled coarse aggregate and fine aggregate below 30% each. However, compared to the trend of recycling, the recycling rate of aggregate is still quite low. It is because of low performance of recycled aggregate, users’ lack of understanding, etc. These problems basically come from the decrease of strength of recycled concrete resulting from the use of recycled aggregate, and recycled aggregate is still considered not reliable because there have been not many cases of actual application. If the basic problem of strength decrease is solved and data on recycled aggregate is provided through actual field placing, we may maximize the use of recycled aggregate.Thus, in order to maximize the use of recycled aggregate that satisfy the recycled aggregate quality standards, the present study made a mock-up similar to real structures, evaluated its performance and examined the field applicability of recycled aggregate concrete.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "폐기물의 재활용 기술과 정책" 건설기술연구원 (5-6) : 2002.05․

      2 정상진 외, "재생골재 콘크리트의 활용화 방안에 관한 실험적 연구" 25 (25): 269-272, 2005.10

      3 정상진 외, "재생골재 콘크리트의 활용화 방안에 관한 실험적 연구" 25 (25): 269-272, 2005.10

      4 정상진 외, "재생골재 콘크리트의 활용화 방안에 관한 실험적 연구" 25 (25): 269-272, 2005.10

      5 김문섭 외, "재생골재 콘크리트의 역학적 특성 압축강도 특성을 중심으로" 13 (13): 305-312, 1997.09

      6 김문섭 외, "재생골재 콘크리트의 역학적 특성 압축강도 특성을 중심으로" 13 (13): 305-312, 1997.09

      7 김무한 외, "재생골재 콘크리트의 구조체 적용성에 관한 기초적 연구(Ⅰ)" 9 (9): 201-211, 1993.08

      8 이세현, "재생골재 콘크리트의 구조체 적용성에 관한 기초적 연구" 201-211, 1993.8

      9 김용진, "자원순환형 사회 구축을 위한 정책 추진방향" 2006.06

      10 김용진, "자원순환형 사회 구축을 위한 정책 추진방향" 2006.06

      1 "폐기물의 재활용 기술과 정책" 건설기술연구원 (5-6) : 2002.05․

      2 정상진 외, "재생골재 콘크리트의 활용화 방안에 관한 실험적 연구" 25 (25): 269-272, 2005.10

      3 정상진 외, "재생골재 콘크리트의 활용화 방안에 관한 실험적 연구" 25 (25): 269-272, 2005.10

      4 정상진 외, "재생골재 콘크리트의 활용화 방안에 관한 실험적 연구" 25 (25): 269-272, 2005.10

      5 김문섭 외, "재생골재 콘크리트의 역학적 특성 압축강도 특성을 중심으로" 13 (13): 305-312, 1997.09

      6 김문섭 외, "재생골재 콘크리트의 역학적 특성 압축강도 특성을 중심으로" 13 (13): 305-312, 1997.09

      7 김무한 외, "재생골재 콘크리트의 구조체 적용성에 관한 기초적 연구(Ⅰ)" 9 (9): 201-211, 1993.08

      8 이세현, "재생골재 콘크리트의 구조체 적용성에 관한 기초적 연구" 201-211, 1993.8

      9 김용진, "자원순환형 사회 구축을 위한 정책 추진방향" 2006.06

      10 김용진, "자원순환형 사회 구축을 위한 정책 추진방향" 2006.06

      11 이세현, "건폐기물의 재활용 기술과 정책" 건설기술연구원 (5-6) : 2002.05․

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.29 0.29 0.25
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.23 0.463 0.09
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼