RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      과세기반구조와 세율구조의 누진성과 재분배효과 = Progressivity and Redistributive Effect of the Tax Base Structure and the Tax Rate Structure

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108533006

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper decomposes the tax base effect and the tax rate effect from the Suits-related indexes such as the Suits index and the Pfhler index adopting the decomposition methodologies of Gini-related indexes such as the Kakwani index and the Reynolds-Smolensky index. The tax base effect is the progressivity and redistributive effect of the income deductions and the tax rate effect is the progressivity and redistributive effect of the tax rates and the tax credits.
      By applying the above methodologies into the 2013-2018 year of Korean earned income tax, the following empirical results are obtained. The progressivity index and the distribution index and the tax base and tax rate effects represent progressive taxation and strengthening redistributive effect. Furthermore, important changes of the indexes are as follows.
      In 2014 in which the tax system has changed greatly, the absolute value of the tax base effect is decreasing, the tax rate effect is increasing, and the indexes are increasing except for the suits index. These results means the revision of earned income deduction rate weakens tax progressivity and strengthens income redistribution and the change of income deduction method into tax credit method from income deduction method strengthens both tax progressivity and income redistribution. In 2017 as compared with 2016, absolute value of the tax base effect and the tax rate effect are decreasing and so the indexes are decreasing. The reason is related with factors such as increase of foreign tax credits for high income earners, which is irrelevant to income tax revisions. In 2018 the tax rate effects and indexes show the most high value, whose reason is related with top tax rate increase.
      번역하기

      This paper decomposes the tax base effect and the tax rate effect from the Suits-related indexes such as the Suits index and the Pfhler index adopting the decomposition methodologies of Gini-related indexes such as the Kakwani index and the Reynolds-S...

      This paper decomposes the tax base effect and the tax rate effect from the Suits-related indexes such as the Suits index and the Pfhler index adopting the decomposition methodologies of Gini-related indexes such as the Kakwani index and the Reynolds-Smolensky index. The tax base effect is the progressivity and redistributive effect of the income deductions and the tax rate effect is the progressivity and redistributive effect of the tax rates and the tax credits.
      By applying the above methodologies into the 2013-2018 year of Korean earned income tax, the following empirical results are obtained. The progressivity index and the distribution index and the tax base and tax rate effects represent progressive taxation and strengthening redistributive effect. Furthermore, important changes of the indexes are as follows.
      In 2014 in which the tax system has changed greatly, the absolute value of the tax base effect is decreasing, the tax rate effect is increasing, and the indexes are increasing except for the suits index. These results means the revision of earned income deduction rate weakens tax progressivity and strengthens income redistribution and the change of income deduction method into tax credit method from income deduction method strengthens both tax progressivity and income redistribution. In 2017 as compared with 2016, absolute value of the tax base effect and the tax rate effect are decreasing and so the indexes are decreasing. The reason is related with factors such as increase of foreign tax credits for high income earners, which is irrelevant to income tax revisions. In 2018 the tax rate effects and indexes show the most high value, whose reason is related with top tax rate increase.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박한순, "조세의 누진성과 재분배효과" 한국회계정책학회 17 (17): 265-288, 2012

      2 한국재정학회, "소득세 공제제도 개선방안 연구" 기획재정부 2013

      3 박한순, "소득분포와 표준화세율이 조세누진성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계정책학회 16 (16): 161-179, 2011

      4 김광윤 ; 심충진 ; 이영환, "소득과세의 공평성 평가와 합리적 증세방안에 대한 연구" 한국세무학회 14 (14): 41-72, 2013

      5 정두영, "납세의식의 인지도 차이에 관한 연구 - 세무업무종사자와 일반납세자 집단 간의 차이 -" 국가미래기술경영연구소 6 (6): 23-42, 2021

      6 박한순, "근로소득세제 개정이 조세 누진성과 소득 재분배에 미치는 영향" 한국세무학회 17 (17): 93-112, 2016

      7 성명재, "근로ㆍ종합소득세의 세제지원 효과 연구" 한국세무학회 24 (24): 295-336, 2007

      8 정호영, "국가미래기술과 조세역량 강화를 위한 납세의식 결정요인 검증" 국가미래기술경영연구소 3 (3): 1-23, 2018

      9 Lambert, P. L., "The Distribution and Redistribution of Income" Manchester University Press 2001

      10 박한순, "Suits지수 구성요소를 이용한 조세 공평성 분석" 한국회계정책학회 14 (14): 71-101, 2009

      1 박한순, "조세의 누진성과 재분배효과" 한국회계정책학회 17 (17): 265-288, 2012

      2 한국재정학회, "소득세 공제제도 개선방안 연구" 기획재정부 2013

      3 박한순, "소득분포와 표준화세율이 조세누진성에 미치는 영향" 한국회계정책학회 16 (16): 161-179, 2011

      4 김광윤 ; 심충진 ; 이영환, "소득과세의 공평성 평가와 합리적 증세방안에 대한 연구" 한국세무학회 14 (14): 41-72, 2013

      5 정두영, "납세의식의 인지도 차이에 관한 연구 - 세무업무종사자와 일반납세자 집단 간의 차이 -" 국가미래기술경영연구소 6 (6): 23-42, 2021

      6 박한순, "근로소득세제 개정이 조세 누진성과 소득 재분배에 미치는 영향" 한국세무학회 17 (17): 93-112, 2016

      7 성명재, "근로ㆍ종합소득세의 세제지원 효과 연구" 한국세무학회 24 (24): 295-336, 2007

      8 정호영, "국가미래기술과 조세역량 강화를 위한 납세의식 결정요인 검증" 국가미래기술경영연구소 3 (3): 1-23, 2018

      9 Lambert, P. L., "The Distribution and Redistribution of Income" Manchester University Press 2001

      10 박한순, "Suits지수 구성요소를 이용한 조세 공평성 분석" 한국회계정책학회 14 (14): 71-101, 2009

      11 Pfa¨hler, W., "Redistributive Effects of Income Taxation : Decomposing Tax Base and Tax Rates Effects" 42 : 121-129, 1990

      12 Aronson, J., "Redistributive Effect and Unequal Income Tax Treatment" 104 : 262-270, 1994

      13 Kakwani, N. C., "Measurement of Tax Progressivity : An International Comparison" 87 : 71-80, 1977

      14 Silber, J., "Income Distribution, Tax Structure, and the Measurement of Tax Progressivity" 22 : 86-102, 1994

      15 Hayes, K., "Evaluating Effective Income Tax Progression" 56 : 461-474, 1995

      16 Kiefer, D. W., "Distributional Tax Progressivity Indexes" 37 : 497-513, 1984

      17 Formby, J., "Difficulties in the Measurement and Comparison of Tax Progressivity : The Case of North America" 39 : 97-313, 1984

      18 Seetharaman, A., "A Comparison of Alternative Measures of Tax Progressivity : The Case of the Child and Dependent Care Credit" 17 : 42-70, 1995

      19 김성태 ; 김명규 ; 임병인, "2014년 적용 소득세법의 형평성 및 누진성 분석" 한국재정학회 7 (7): 53-79, 2014

      20 김낙년, "2013년 소득세제 개편과 계층별 소득세 부담률" 한국재정학회 7 (7): 59-93, 2014

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼