RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      통일한국 실현을 위한 한러관계의 재조명 = A New Look at ROK-Russia Relations

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Since the Kingdom of Chosun established diplomatic relations with the Russian Empire in 1884, the relationship between the two countries has been turbulent. First, the Chosun government was forced by the Japanese empire to give up its sovereign power over diplomacy in 1905. At the end of World War II, the Soviet Red Army advanced to the 38th parallel to disarm the Imperial Japanese army, which became the origin of the division of the Korean Peninsula. Soon after, Kim Il-sung, in close collaboration with Stalin, launched a war against the Republic of Korea in 1950, and the ROK and Russia continued their hostility until the re-establishment of diplomatic relations in 1990 as an outcome of Roh Tae Woo’s “Northern Policy” and Gorbachev’s “Perestroika and Glasnost.”
      The two nations have made strenuous efforts to develop mutually complementary relations for the last 25 years, but the present situation remains far below expectations. Today, the Putin government is experiencing difficulties as a result of economic sanctions imposed by the U.S., EU, Canada and Australia triggered by Russia’s territorial integration of the Crimean region in 2014. In response, Putin in 2014 announced a “New Eastern Policy” aiming at the exploration and development of the Far East region surrounding the Premolski areas, the geographic point closest to the ROK and Japan.
      We need to look anew at the Far East as the point of intersection between Korea’s Northern Policy and Russia’s Eastern Policy. The total volume of trade and investment between the two countries has fallen sharply to less than 1/15th of that between the ROK and the PRC. The preponderance of trade with and investment in China should shift toward Russia, which will revitalize the Russian economy.
      Five years ago, IMEMO, a prominent Russian research institute, asserted that unification of the Korean Peninsula could be led by the ROK on the basis of democracy and a market economy and this will best serve the interests of the Russian Federation. We should make utmost efforts to utilize Russia’s potential to reunify the Korean Peninsula, an outcome that will serve both Korea and Russia well. After unification, the trans-Siberian railways [TSR] will be connected to Korean railways and the pipeline construction project that allows Russian natural to pass through the Korean Peninsula will provide another source of resilience for both countries. All these factors will greatly contribute to the security, peace, and prosperity of this region as a whole.
      번역하기

      Since the Kingdom of Chosun established diplomatic relations with the Russian Empire in 1884, the relationship between the two countries has been turbulent. First, the Chosun government was forced by the Japanese empire to give up its sovereign power ...

      Since the Kingdom of Chosun established diplomatic relations with the Russian Empire in 1884, the relationship between the two countries has been turbulent. First, the Chosun government was forced by the Japanese empire to give up its sovereign power over diplomacy in 1905. At the end of World War II, the Soviet Red Army advanced to the 38th parallel to disarm the Imperial Japanese army, which became the origin of the division of the Korean Peninsula. Soon after, Kim Il-sung, in close collaboration with Stalin, launched a war against the Republic of Korea in 1950, and the ROK and Russia continued their hostility until the re-establishment of diplomatic relations in 1990 as an outcome of Roh Tae Woo’s “Northern Policy” and Gorbachev’s “Perestroika and Glasnost.”
      The two nations have made strenuous efforts to develop mutually complementary relations for the last 25 years, but the present situation remains far below expectations. Today, the Putin government is experiencing difficulties as a result of economic sanctions imposed by the U.S., EU, Canada and Australia triggered by Russia’s territorial integration of the Crimean region in 2014. In response, Putin in 2014 announced a “New Eastern Policy” aiming at the exploration and development of the Far East region surrounding the Premolski areas, the geographic point closest to the ROK and Japan.
      We need to look anew at the Far East as the point of intersection between Korea’s Northern Policy and Russia’s Eastern Policy. The total volume of trade and investment between the two countries has fallen sharply to less than 1/15th of that between the ROK and the PRC. The preponderance of trade with and investment in China should shift toward Russia, which will revitalize the Russian economy.
      Five years ago, IMEMO, a prominent Russian research institute, asserted that unification of the Korean Peninsula could be led by the ROK on the basis of democracy and a market economy and this will best serve the interests of the Russian Federation. We should make utmost efforts to utilize Russia’s potential to reunify the Korean Peninsula, an outcome that will serve both Korea and Russia well. After unification, the trans-Siberian railways [TSR] will be connected to Korean railways and the pipeline construction project that allows Russian natural to pass through the Korean Peninsula will provide another source of resilience for both countries. All these factors will greatly contribute to the security, peace, and prosperity of this region as a whole.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서언
      • Ⅱ. 우방에서 적으로 그리고 다시 우방으로
      • Ⅲ. 북방외교의 금자탑 한‧러수교
      • Ⅳ. 푸틴시대와 한‧러관계
      • Ⅴ. 러시아 정세와 한‧러관계 현주소
      • Ⅰ. 서언
      • Ⅱ. 우방에서 적으로 그리고 다시 우방으로
      • Ⅲ. 북방외교의 금자탑 한‧러수교
      • Ⅳ. 푸틴시대와 한‧러관계
      • Ⅴ. 러시아 정세와 한‧러관계 현주소
      • Ⅵ. 러시아의 신동방정책과 한국의 북방정책의 교차점
      • Ⅶ. 결어: 한‧러가 Win-Win 할 수있는 프로젝트
      • Abstract
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼