RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      폴 리쾨르의 텍스트 이론을 바탕으로 살펴본 『프로슬로기온』 (Proslogion)의 문학적 형태

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101718633

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Until now, Anselm’s Proslogion has been interpreted as a philosophical or theological text by most philosophers and theologians such as René Descartes, Immanuel Kant, Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Thomas Aquinas, and Karl Barth. Even though their interpretations established their own traditions and dedicated to valuable academic progresses in philosophy and theology, they have neglected an essential part of the Proslogion: the form of the text. Thus, in this article, the literary genre of the Proslogion was analyzed through Robert McMahon’s understanding of ‘medieval meditative ascent,’ which refers to both the journey of the soul to God and a literary genre of the medieval era. For the purpose of more accurate and fruitful analysis of the genre of the Proslogion, McMahon’s ‘medieval meditative ascent was criticized and articulated through Paul Ricoeur’s text theory and religious hermeneutics. As a result, it was revealed that the Proslogion was written in a way of promoting the transformation of the reader through the dialectic of poetic reference and limit expression. Through this dialectic, the reader of the Proslogion is supposed to experience the transition of perspectives of oneself concerning God and the world. In this way, the reader is to have a faith. Thus, from the perspective of its genre, the Proslogion was a de facto religious text which aims at reader’s religious transformation through meditative reading. This literary and practical interpretation of the Proslogion should shed light on the philosophical, theological, and historical interpretations of the past and the present.
      번역하기

      Until now, Anselm’s Proslogion has been interpreted as a philosophical or theological text by most philosophers and theologians such as René Descartes, Immanuel Kant, Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Thomas Aquinas, and Karl Barth. Even though their interp...

      Until now, Anselm’s Proslogion has been interpreted as a philosophical or theological text by most philosophers and theologians such as René Descartes, Immanuel Kant, Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Thomas Aquinas, and Karl Barth. Even though their interpretations established their own traditions and dedicated to valuable academic progresses in philosophy and theology, they have neglected an essential part of the Proslogion: the form of the text. Thus, in this article, the literary genre of the Proslogion was analyzed through Robert McMahon’s understanding of ‘medieval meditative ascent,’ which refers to both the journey of the soul to God and a literary genre of the medieval era. For the purpose of more accurate and fruitful analysis of the genre of the Proslogion, McMahon’s ‘medieval meditative ascent was criticized and articulated through Paul Ricoeur’s text theory and religious hermeneutics. As a result, it was revealed that the Proslogion was written in a way of promoting the transformation of the reader through the dialectic of poetic reference and limit expression. Through this dialectic, the reader of the Proslogion is supposed to experience the transition of perspectives of oneself concerning God and the world. In this way, the reader is to have a faith. Thus, from the perspective of its genre, the Proslogion was a de facto religious text which aims at reader’s religious transformation through meditative reading. This literary and practical interpretation of the Proslogion should shed light on the philosophical, theological, and historical interpretations of the past and the present.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 현우식, "현대 수학으로 보는 안셀무스의 신의 정의: 프로슬로기온과 극대성을 중심으로" 한국종교학회 75 (75): 177-192, 2015

      2 양명수, "폴 리쾨르의 해석학과 신학-텍스트 이론을 중심으로" 한국신학연구소 (127) : 167-198, 2004

      3 현우식, "쿠르트 괴델(Kurt Gdel)의 수학적 신학:불완전성 정리, 무한, 하나님에 관한 존재론적 증명" 한국기독교학회 (49) : 171-196, 2007

      4 김재진, "안셀무스(Anselmus Cantaberiensis)의 하나님 이해 - Proslogion을 중심으로 -" 연세대학교 신과대학 연합신학대학원 56 : 129-159, 2009

      5 정미현, "안셀름 신학의 현대신학적 수용" 3 : 229-244, 1998

      6 캔터베리의 안셀무스, "모놀로기온 & 프로슬로기온" 아카넷 2002

      7 McMahon, Robert, "Understanding the Medieval Meditative Ascent: Augustine, Anselm, Boethius, & Dante" The Catholic University of America Press 2006

      8 Kim, Young Won, "Trial of Obedience to the Word of God: Anselm’s Proslogion and the Renewal of Discourse between Analogia Entis and Analogia Fidei" Graduate Theological Union. 2012

      9 Ricoeur, Paul, "The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics" Northwestern University Press 1974

      10 Rist, John, "The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus" Cambridge University Press 386-409, 1996

      1 현우식, "현대 수학으로 보는 안셀무스의 신의 정의: 프로슬로기온과 극대성을 중심으로" 한국종교학회 75 (75): 177-192, 2015

      2 양명수, "폴 리쾨르의 해석학과 신학-텍스트 이론을 중심으로" 한국신학연구소 (127) : 167-198, 2004

      3 현우식, "쿠르트 괴델(Kurt Gdel)의 수학적 신학:불완전성 정리, 무한, 하나님에 관한 존재론적 증명" 한국기독교학회 (49) : 171-196, 2007

      4 김재진, "안셀무스(Anselmus Cantaberiensis)의 하나님 이해 - Proslogion을 중심으로 -" 연세대학교 신과대학 연합신학대학원 56 : 129-159, 2009

      5 정미현, "안셀름 신학의 현대신학적 수용" 3 : 229-244, 1998

      6 캔터베리의 안셀무스, "모놀로기온 & 프로슬로기온" 아카넷 2002

      7 McMahon, Robert, "Understanding the Medieval Meditative Ascent: Augustine, Anselm, Boethius, & Dante" The Catholic University of America Press 2006

      8 Kim, Young Won, "Trial of Obedience to the Word of God: Anselm’s Proslogion and the Renewal of Discourse between Analogia Entis and Analogia Fidei" Graduate Theological Union. 2012

      9 Ricoeur, Paul, "The Conflict of Interpretations: Essays in Hermeneutics" Northwestern University Press 1974

      10 Rist, John, "The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus" Cambridge University Press 386-409, 1996

      11 Busannich, John, "The Cambridge Companion to Plotinus" Cambridge University Press 38-63, 1996

      12 Schmitt, Franciscus Salesius, "Sancti Anselmi Opera Omnia" Thomas Nelson & Sons 1961

      13 Southern, Sir Richard, "Saint Anselm: a Thinker for Yesterday and Today" The Edwin Mellen Press 20-36, 2002

      14 Anselmus, "Proslogion"

      15 Ricoeur, Paul, "Interpretation Theory: Discourse and Surplus of Meaning" Texas Christian Univ. Press 1976

      16 Ricoeur, Paul, "From Text to Action: Essays in Hermeneutics II" Northwestern University Press 1991

      17 Ricoeur, Paul, "Figuring the Sacred: Religion, Narrative, and Imagination" Fortress Press 1995

      18 Ricoeur, Paul, "Essays on Biblical Hermeneutics" Fortress Press 1980

      19 Barth, Karl, "Anselm: Fides Quaerens Intellectum: Anselm’s Proof of the Existence of God in the Context of his Theological Scheme" John Knox Press 1960

      20 Herrera, R. A., "Analecta Anselmiana B 3" Snow Lion Publications 141-145, 1972

      21 Ferrara, Vincent J., "Analecta Anselmiana B 3" Snow Lion Publications 95-111, 1972

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.46 0.46 0.44
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.45 0.42 0.801 0.08
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼