RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      The Role of Human and Definite Features in Korean Pluralization

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106892239

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper addresses a specific context where the so-called plural marking – tul in Korean is obligatory for plural denotation, sharply contrasting with the widely known generalization that in classifier languages, plural morphology is merely optional. A human noun in Korean requires a number specification by –tul, when it denotes plural individuals in an anaphoric definite context, whereas a non-human noun does not require it under the same condition. This contrast will be explained by the peculiarity of human nouns that can take null classifiers, distinct from other nouns in Korean. Human nouns, being associated with null classifiers, behave as count nouns and require explicit number specifications by -tul when full DP structures are supposed to project.
      Non-human nouns, in contrast, are mass nouns without resorting to overt classifiers, and hence do not require number specifications by -tul even when complete DPs are projected. This discussion, in turn, leads to implications on the syntactic status of –tul in Korean, arguing for a head plural analysis, instead of a modifying plural analysis, and further on the DP- vs. NP-language debate of classifier languages.
      번역하기

      This paper addresses a specific context where the so-called plural marking – tul in Korean is obligatory for plural denotation, sharply contrasting with the widely known generalization that in classifier languages, plural morphology is merely option...

      This paper addresses a specific context where the so-called plural marking – tul in Korean is obligatory for plural denotation, sharply contrasting with the widely known generalization that in classifier languages, plural morphology is merely optional. A human noun in Korean requires a number specification by –tul, when it denotes plural individuals in an anaphoric definite context, whereas a non-human noun does not require it under the same condition. This contrast will be explained by the peculiarity of human nouns that can take null classifiers, distinct from other nouns in Korean. Human nouns, being associated with null classifiers, behave as count nouns and require explicit number specifications by -tul when full DP structures are supposed to project.
      Non-human nouns, in contrast, are mass nouns without resorting to overt classifiers, and hence do not require number specifications by -tul even when complete DPs are projected. This discussion, in turn, leads to implications on the syntactic status of –tul in Korean, arguing for a head plural analysis, instead of a modifying plural analysis, and further on the DP- vs. NP-language debate of classifier languages.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 백미현, "한국어 복수 의미 연구" 담화·인지언어학회 9 (9): 59-78, 2002

      2 Jun, Young-Churl, "hankwukeuy pokswusengkwa chongchingseng/hancengseng (Korean plurality and genericity/definiteness)" 8 (8): 89-118, 2004

      3 Schwarz, Florian, "Two kinds of definites cross-linguistically" 7 : 534-559, 2013

      4 Fukui, Naoki, "The visibility guideline for functional categories" 113 : 321-375, 2003

      5 Wiltschko, Martina, "The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking" 26 : 639-694, 2008

      6 Ionin, Tania, "The composition of complex cardinals" 23 (23): 315-360, 2006

      7 Halle, Morris, "The View from Building 20" MIT Press 111-176, 1993

      8 Simpson, Andrew, "The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax" Oxford University Press 806-838, 2005

      9 Krifka, Manfred, "The Generic Book" Univeristy of Chicago Press 393-411, 1995

      10 Bale, Alan, "Syntactic complexity and competition: The singular-plural distinction in Western Armenian" 45 (45): 1-26, 2014

      1 백미현, "한국어 복수 의미 연구" 담화·인지언어학회 9 (9): 59-78, 2002

      2 Jun, Young-Churl, "hankwukeuy pokswusengkwa chongchingseng/hancengseng (Korean plurality and genericity/definiteness)" 8 (8): 89-118, 2004

      3 Schwarz, Florian, "Two kinds of definites cross-linguistically" 7 : 534-559, 2013

      4 Fukui, Naoki, "The visibility guideline for functional categories" 113 : 321-375, 2003

      5 Wiltschko, Martina, "The syntax of non-inflectional plural marking" 26 : 639-694, 2008

      6 Ionin, Tania, "The composition of complex cardinals" 23 (23): 315-360, 2006

      7 Halle, Morris, "The View from Building 20" MIT Press 111-176, 1993

      8 Simpson, Andrew, "The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax" Oxford University Press 806-838, 2005

      9 Krifka, Manfred, "The Generic Book" Univeristy of Chicago Press 393-411, 1995

      10 Bale, Alan, "Syntactic complexity and competition: The singular-plural distinction in Western Armenian" 45 (45): 1-26, 2014

      11 Borer, Hagit, "Structuring Sense I" Oxford University Press 2005

      12 Simpson, Andrew, "Strict vs. free word order patterns in Korean nominal phrases and cyclic linearization" 73 : 139-174, 2019

      13 Chierchia, Gennaro, "Reference to kinds across languages" 6 : 339-405, 1998

      14 Longobardi, Giuseppe, "Reference and proper names" 25 : 609-666, 1994

      15 Lim, Dong-Hoon, "Pragmatic effects of number and person in Korean pronominal system" 204 : 1-15, 2018

      16 Li, Audrey, "Plurality in a classifier language" 8 : 75-99, 1999

      17 Kang, Bum-Mo, "Plurality and other semantic aspects of common nouns in Korean" 3 : 1-24, 1994

      18 최기용, "On the Nature of the Dependency between a Numeral and a Classifier" 언어정보연구소 28 (28): 517-542, 2011

      19 Dayal, Veneeta, "Number marking and(in)definiteness in kind terms" 27 : 393-450, 2004

      20 Bošković, Željko, "Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis" 45 : 27-89, 2014

      21 Jiang, Julie, "Nominal arguments and language variation" Harvard University 2012

      22 Liao, Wei-Wen Roger, "Multiple-classifier constructions and nominal expressions in Chinese" 20 : 145-168, 2011

      23 Embick, David, "Movement operations after syntax" 32 : 555-595, 2001

      24 Kim, Kyumin, "Modifying plurals, classifiers, and co-occurrence: The case of Korean" 25 : 1-29, 2018

      25 Link, Godehard, "Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language" de Gruyter 302-323, 1983

      26 Jiang, Julie, "Mandarin associative plural –men and NPs with –men" 4 (4): 191-256, 2017

      27 Zamparelli, Roberto, "Layers in the Determiner Phrase" Garland Publishing 2000

      28 Kwak, Eun-Joo, "Interpretation of plural noun phrases in Korean" 35 : 67-92, 2003

      29 Jun, Young-Churl, "Hankwue Myengsakwuuy Uymilon (A Semantics for Korean Noun Phrases)" Seoul National University Press 2013

      30 Park, So-Young, "Functional categories: The syntax of DP and DegP" University of Southern California 2008

      31 Kwon, SongNim, "Empirical Issues in Formal Syntax and Semantics 5" Peter Lang Publishing 133-158, 2004

      32 Wu, Yicheng, "Classifiers ≠ determiners" 40 (40): 487-503, 2009

      33 Simpson, Andrew, "Classifier syntax in Vietnamese" 27 : 211-246, 2018

      34 Im, Hong-Bin, "Bokswu phyoci ‘tul’kwa sakenseng (The plural marking –tul and eventuality)" 24 : 34-58, 2000

      35 Cheng, Lisa, "Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP" 30 : 509-542, 1999

      36 Dayal, Veneeta, "Bangla classifiers : Mediating between kinds and objects" 24 : 195-226, 2012

      37 Jenks, Peter, "Articulated definiteness without articles" 49 (49): 501-536, 2018

      38 박소영, "Anatomy of Plural Expressions: Pseudo-Plurality and Real Plurality" 한국언어학회 34 (34): 25-52, 2009

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-10-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Studies in Generative Grammar KCI등재
      2005-02-16 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Studies in Generative Grammar KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2000-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.6 0.6 0.56
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.55 0.48 1.439 0.27
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼