RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    간송미술관 소장 <골굴 석굴도>의 작가와 회화적 재현 방식 고찰 = < Golgul and Seokgul Cave Temples >, its painter and the way of pictorialization

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The painting < Golgul and Seokgul Cave Temples > part of the 《Album of Scenic Spots in Gyonam》 in the collection of Kansong Museum is a true-view landscape painting from Joseon Period representing the Buddhist temples, Golgulsa and Seokguram. This painting gathered a keen interest among the academic world because it served as a historic material for the restoration of the original shape of Seokguram and because it was identified as a work of Jeong Seon(鄭敾), one of the greatest true-view landscape painters of Joseon with the colophon written by O Se-chang(吳世昌). However, there have since been a number of scholars doubting the authenticity due to the stylistic features. Also, the composition of the painting which placed the two cave temples on the side of a same mountain has puzzled the viewers because it was not the actual geography. This paper, thus, deals with the problem of the painter, whether it was done by Jeong Seon or another artist, and the way of the pictorialisation of the scenery comprising the two temples.
    The conclusion is as follows; first, < The Golgul and Seokgul > was painted not by Jeong Seon, nor was it done by his grandson, Jeong Hwang(鄭榥). It was painted by an anonymous painter who followed the landscape style of Jeong Seon in late 18th century. It was closely related with the flourishing production of the true-view landscape paintings containing the scenic spots in Yeongnam province. Second, the mislocation of the two cave temples could have been affected by the pictorial maps from late Joseon period. Similar mislocation can be detected in some pictorial maps that copied the existing versions, thus lacking in accuracy in distance and direction of the spots. It is for sure the painter who worked the < Golgul and Seokgul Cave Temples > has not been to the actual sites. He could have referred to the inaccurate copied versions of the pictorial maps or then existing paintings of the same scene.
    In any case, the painting < Golgul and Seokgul Cave Temples > carries the significance in that it reflects the interest of the people in the unique and mysterious cave temples amidst the popularity of the albums of scenic spots in Yeongnam region in the 18th century.
    번역하기

    The painting < Golgul and Seokgul Cave Temples > part of the 《Album of Scenic Spots in Gyonam》 in the collection of Kansong Museum is a true-view landscape painting from Joseon Period representing the Buddhist temples, Golgulsa and Seokguram...

    The painting < Golgul and Seokgul Cave Temples > part of the 《Album of Scenic Spots in Gyonam》 in the collection of Kansong Museum is a true-view landscape painting from Joseon Period representing the Buddhist temples, Golgulsa and Seokguram. This painting gathered a keen interest among the academic world because it served as a historic material for the restoration of the original shape of Seokguram and because it was identified as a work of Jeong Seon(鄭敾), one of the greatest true-view landscape painters of Joseon with the colophon written by O Se-chang(吳世昌). However, there have since been a number of scholars doubting the authenticity due to the stylistic features. Also, the composition of the painting which placed the two cave temples on the side of a same mountain has puzzled the viewers because it was not the actual geography. This paper, thus, deals with the problem of the painter, whether it was done by Jeong Seon or another artist, and the way of the pictorialisation of the scenery comprising the two temples.
    The conclusion is as follows; first, < The Golgul and Seokgul > was painted not by Jeong Seon, nor was it done by his grandson, Jeong Hwang(鄭榥). It was painted by an anonymous painter who followed the landscape style of Jeong Seon in late 18th century. It was closely related with the flourishing production of the true-view landscape paintings containing the scenic spots in Yeongnam province. Second, the mislocation of the two cave temples could have been affected by the pictorial maps from late Joseon period. Similar mislocation can be detected in some pictorial maps that copied the existing versions, thus lacking in accuracy in distance and direction of the spots. It is for sure the painter who worked the < Golgul and Seokgul Cave Temples > has not been to the actual sites. He could have referred to the inaccurate copied versions of the pictorial maps or then existing paintings of the same scene.
    In any case, the painting < Golgul and Seokgul Cave Temples > carries the significance in that it reflects the interest of the people in the unique and mysterious cave temples amidst the popularity of the albums of scenic spots in Yeongnam region in the 18th century.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 유홍준, "화인열전 1권" 역사비평사 2001

    2 양보경, "해동지도-해설, 색인" 서울대학교 규장각 1995

    3 "한국의 미 12" 중앙일보사 1982

    4 이태호, "진재 김윤겸의 진경산수" 152 : 1981

    5 이다홍, "진재 김윤겸(1711-1775)의 회화연구" 홍익대학교 대학원 2009

    6 이태호, "조선후기 회화의 사실정신" 학고재 1996

    7 고연희, "조선후기 산수기행예술 연구-정선과 농연 그룸을 중심으로-" 일지사 2001

    8 정은주, "조선후기 繪畵式 郡縣地圖 연구" 한국문화역사지리학회 23 (23): 119-140, 2011

    9 김기혁, "조선 후기 군현지도의 유형 연구- 동래부를 사례로 -" 대한지리학회 40 (40): 1-26, 2005

    10 한영우, "우리 옛지도와 그 아름다움" 효형출판 1999

    1 유홍준, "화인열전 1권" 역사비평사 2001

    2 양보경, "해동지도-해설, 색인" 서울대학교 규장각 1995

    3 "한국의 미 12" 중앙일보사 1982

    4 이태호, "진재 김윤겸의 진경산수" 152 : 1981

    5 이다홍, "진재 김윤겸(1711-1775)의 회화연구" 홍익대학교 대학원 2009

    6 이태호, "조선후기 회화의 사실정신" 학고재 1996

    7 고연희, "조선후기 산수기행예술 연구-정선과 농연 그룸을 중심으로-" 일지사 2001

    8 정은주, "조선후기 繪畵式 郡縣地圖 연구" 한국문화역사지리학회 23 (23): 119-140, 2011

    9 김기혁, "조선 후기 군현지도의 유형 연구- 동래부를 사례로 -" 대한지리학회 40 (40): 1-26, 2005

    10 한영우, "우리 옛지도와 그 아름다움" 효형출판 1999

    11 안휘준, "우리 옛 지도와 그 아름다움" 효형출판 1999

    12 김수진, "불염재 김희성의 회화 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2006

    13 유재빈, "도산도 연구" 서울대학교 대학원 2004

    14 이태호, "겸재 정선이 가계와 생애" 13·14 : 1983

    15 최완수, "겸재 정선 1" 현암사 2009

    16 "간송문화 29호(1985), 35호"

    17 국립문화재연구소, "韓國歷代書畵家事典 下" 2011

    18 幽玄齋, "韓國古書畵圖錄" 幽玄齋 1996

    19 閔遇洙, "貞菴集"

    20 崔完秀, "謙齋眞景山水畵考" 韓國民族美術硏究所 35 : 1988

    21 崔完秀, "謙齋 鄭敾 眞景山水畵" 범우사 1993

    22 全暎雨, "謙齊畵 嶠南名勝帖의 慶州骨窟石窟圖" 5 (5): 1964

    23 李德壽, "西堂私載"

    24 南景羲, "癡庵集"

    25 성균관대학교박물관, "槿墨: 禮" 2009

    26 洪世泰, "柳下集"

    27 이현주, "東亞大學校 博物館 소장 眞宰 金允謙『嶺南紀行畵帖』" 동아시아문물연구학술재단 07 (07): 155-202, 2003

    28 이보라, "朝鮮時代關東八景圖의硏究" 한국미술사학회 266 (266): 157-188, 2010

    29 유미나, "朝鮮 後半期 中國名勝圖 연구 ―山水畵譜 臨摹帖을 중심으로―" 한국불교미술사학회 (33) : 226-265, 2009

    30 南皐, "時庵集"

    31 鄭栻, "明庵集"

    32 丁時翰, "愚潭集"

    33 李萬敷, "息山集"

    34 李鎭宅, "德峯集"

    35 권오찬, "山中日記 下" 原州市 2012

    36 趙裕壽, "后溪集"

    37 金昌翕, "三淵集"

    38 박은순, "19世紀 繪畫式 郡縣地圖와 地方文化" 한국고지도연구학회 1 (1): 31-61, 2009

    39 양보경, "18세기 비변사지도의 고찰-규장각 소장 도별 군현지도집을 중심으로" (15) : 1992

    40 裵祐晟, "18世紀 官撰地圖 製作과 地理 認識" 서울大學校 大學院 1996

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-06-09 학술지명변경 한글명 : 불교미술사학 -> 강좌미술사
    외국어명 : BULKYOMISULSAHAK -> The Art History Journal
    KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.21 0.21 0.23
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.26 0.3 0.589 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼