RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    ARCS 모형 적용 수업이 수학과 학습동기와 학업성취에 미치는 효과

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T8959887

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      대구: 대구교육대학교 교육대학원, 2003

    • 학위논문사항
    • 발행연도

      2003

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • DDC

      371.3

    • 발행국(도시)

      대구

    • 형태사항

      ii,65p.: 삽도; 26cm.

    • 일반주기명

      참고문헌 : p.48-50

    • 소장기관
      • 대구교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 부산교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 서울교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 전주교육대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Keller's ARCS model applied instruction on the teaming motivation and achievement of elementary mathematics. The specific research problems of interest in this study were as follows:
    First, is there any difference between the group of ARCS model applied instruction and that of traditional instruction on the learning motivation?
    Second, is there any difference between the group of ARCS model applied instruction and that of traditional instruction on the academic achievement of elementary mathematics?
    The main hypotheses tested were as follows:
    1) There would be a significant difference between the group of ARCs model applied instruction and that of traditional instruction on the whole learning motivation and its part(attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction) test scores.
    2)There would be a significant difference between the group of ARCS model applied instruction and that of traditional instruction on the academic achievement test scores of elementary mathematics.
    The subjects in this study were 52(2 class) fourth-grade elementary school students. Each class was composed of 26 students and assigned to the experimental and control group. Experimental group had the ARCS model applied instruction and control group had a traditional instruction.
    The experimental instruments used in this study were the prior scores of achievement test and learning motivation inventory to verify group homogeneity, posttest of achievement and learning motiivation to identify the treatment effects. The dependent variable was the scores achievement test and learning motivation inventory. The ARCS model applied instruction was delivered about four weeks to test the effects of treatment.
    The experimental design of this study was pre and post test experimental - control group design. T-test was applied to test differences of pre and post test scores in two groups using SPSS Win 10.0. The significance level was 5%.
    The main findings obtained from the results and discussion of this study were as follows:
    (1) There was a significant difference between the group of ARCS model applied instruction and that of traditional instruction on the whole learning motivation test scores. The group of ARCS model applied instruction was higher than that of traditional instruction on the whole learning motivation test scores. And the group of ARCS model applied instruction was higher than that of traditional instruction in the domains of attention, confidence, and satisfaction but in relevance, there was no significant difference.
    (2) There was a significant diffeTence between the group of ARCS model applied instruction and that of traditional instruction on the academic achievement test scores of elementary mathematics. The group of ARCS model applied instTuction was higher than that of traditional instrurtion on the academic achievement test scores of elementary mathematics.
    Consequently, hypotheses 1, 2 were accepted. Therefore, ARCS model applied instruction can be effective to improve elementary school students' learning motivation and academic achievement.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Keller's ARCS model applied instruction on the teaming motivation and achievement of elementary mathematics. The specific research problems of interest in this study were as follows: First, i...

    The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of Keller's ARCS model applied instruction on the teaming motivation and achievement of elementary mathematics. The specific research problems of interest in this study were as follows:
    First, is there any difference between the group of ARCS model applied instruction and that of traditional instruction on the learning motivation?
    Second, is there any difference between the group of ARCS model applied instruction and that of traditional instruction on the academic achievement of elementary mathematics?
    The main hypotheses tested were as follows:
    1) There would be a significant difference between the group of ARCs model applied instruction and that of traditional instruction on the whole learning motivation and its part(attention, relevance, confidence and satisfaction) test scores.
    2)There would be a significant difference between the group of ARCS model applied instruction and that of traditional instruction on the academic achievement test scores of elementary mathematics.
    The subjects in this study were 52(2 class) fourth-grade elementary school students. Each class was composed of 26 students and assigned to the experimental and control group. Experimental group had the ARCS model applied instruction and control group had a traditional instruction.
    The experimental instruments used in this study were the prior scores of achievement test and learning motivation inventory to verify group homogeneity, posttest of achievement and learning motiivation to identify the treatment effects. The dependent variable was the scores achievement test and learning motivation inventory. The ARCS model applied instruction was delivered about four weeks to test the effects of treatment.
    The experimental design of this study was pre and post test experimental - control group design. T-test was applied to test differences of pre and post test scores in two groups using SPSS Win 10.0. The significance level was 5%.
    The main findings obtained from the results and discussion of this study were as follows:
    (1) There was a significant difference between the group of ARCS model applied instruction and that of traditional instruction on the whole learning motivation test scores. The group of ARCS model applied instruction was higher than that of traditional instruction on the whole learning motivation test scores. And the group of ARCS model applied instruction was higher than that of traditional instruction in the domains of attention, confidence, and satisfaction but in relevance, there was no significant difference.
    (2) There was a significant diffeTence between the group of ARCS model applied instruction and that of traditional instruction on the academic achievement test scores of elementary mathematics. The group of ARCS model applied instTuction was higher than that of traditional instrurtion on the academic achievement test scores of elementary mathematics.
    Consequently, hypotheses 1, 2 were accepted. Therefore, ARCS model applied instruction can be effective to improve elementary school students' learning motivation and academic achievement.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 목차
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제와 가설 = 3
    • 3. 용어의 정의 = 4
    • 목차
    • I. 서론 = 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성과 목적 = 1
    • 2. 연구 문제와 가설 = 3
    • 3. 용어의 정의 = 4
    • 4. 연구의 제한점 = 4
    • II. 이론적 배경 = 6
    • 1. 학습동기와 학업성취 = 6
    • 2. ARCS 모형 의 구성 요소와 전략 = 13
    • 3. ARCS 전략 수업설계 모형 = 22
    • III. 연구 방법 = 33
    • 1. 연구 대상 = 33
    • 2. 실험 설계 = 33
    • 3. 검사 도구 = 34
    • 4. 실험 재료 = 34
    • 5. 실험 절차 = 39
    • 6. 자료 분석 = 40
    • IV. 결과 및 논의 = 41
    • 1. 결과 = 41
    • 2. 논의 = 43
    • V. 결론 및 제언 = 47
    • 참고문헌 = 48
    • 영문초록 = 51
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼