RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      자본시장법상 공모집합투자기구의 집합투자재산 운용행위규제에 관한 고찰 = A Study on the Regulation of the Management of Collective Investment Property by Public Collective Investment Schemes under the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Collective investment business refers to a business aimed at collecting funds from investors and investing in assets such as securities using collective investment schemes (CISs) including investment trusts and investment companies and distributing their returns to the investors. Thus, the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (the “Act”) defines collective investment business as an act of acquiring, disposing, or otherwise operating investment assets with property value from two or more investors without receiving daily operating instructions from the investors and distributing the returns to the investors (Article 6 (5) of the Act). Accordingly, the Act classifies CISs into seven types including investment trusts and investment companies. When the Act was introduced, the types of CISs were mainly prepared with the public CIS in mind and the historical concept and essence of collective investment schemes are public CISs.
      However, from an examination of recent fund flows of CISs, it is clear that there is a preference for private CISs rather than public CISs. To address this problem and to restore the trust of investors, in accordance with requests from related parties in the industry and directions from the government and supervisory authorities, the Act has been revised several times as of May 2021. As a result of these revisions, there are difficulties in applying the related regulations in actual working practice.
      Therefore, this article examines the regulations related to the regulation of the management behavior of collective investment assets of public CISs. By presenting the legislative purpose and interpretation, the related regulations may be easily understood and applied to actual working practice and also the study may be useful in aiding future academic resarch.
      번역하기

      Collective investment business refers to a business aimed at collecting funds from investors and investing in assets such as securities using collective investment schemes (CISs) including investment trusts and investment companies and distributing th...

      Collective investment business refers to a business aimed at collecting funds from investors and investing in assets such as securities using collective investment schemes (CISs) including investment trusts and investment companies and distributing their returns to the investors. Thus, the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act (the “Act”) defines collective investment business as an act of acquiring, disposing, or otherwise operating investment assets with property value from two or more investors without receiving daily operating instructions from the investors and distributing the returns to the investors (Article 6 (5) of the Act). Accordingly, the Act classifies CISs into seven types including investment trusts and investment companies. When the Act was introduced, the types of CISs were mainly prepared with the public CIS in mind and the historical concept and essence of collective investment schemes are public CISs.
      However, from an examination of recent fund flows of CISs, it is clear that there is a preference for private CISs rather than public CISs. To address this problem and to restore the trust of investors, in accordance with requests from related parties in the industry and directions from the government and supervisory authorities, the Act has been revised several times as of May 2021. As a result of these revisions, there are difficulties in applying the related regulations in actual working practice.
      Therefore, this article examines the regulations related to the regulation of the management behavior of collective investment assets of public CISs. By presenting the legislative purpose and interpretation, the related regulations may be easily understood and applied to actual working practice and also the study may be useful in aiding future academic resarch.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한서희 ; 백설화, "해외 비트코인 상장지수집합투자기구(ETF) 사례 및 국내 비트코인 상장지수집합투자기구(ETF) 도입을 위한 논의" 한국증권법학회 23 (23): 183-220, 2022

      2 이중기, "투자신탁제도의 신탁적 요소와 조직계약적 요소" 한림대학교 법학연구소 9 : 2000

      3 맹수석, "투자신탁자산의 운용상 주의의무와 투자고객 보호방안" 한국증권법학회 6 (6): 175-208, 2005

      4 신명희 ; 권한용, "집합투자기구의 법적 구조에 대한 고찰 - 회사형 집합투자기구를 중심으로 -" 법과정책연구원 14 (14): 177-212, 2022

      5 오성근, "집합투자기구의 내부자거래 규제 - 미국의 뮤추얼펀드를 중심으로" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 69-121, 2015

      6 김인권, "집합투자(펀드)의 사례와 실무" 박영사 2023

      7 조현석, "지수투자신탁 운용자의 주의의무" 한국신탁학회 2 (2): 2020

      8 김건식, "증권투자신탁의 구조 : 계약형 투신과 회사형 투신을 중심으로" 대한변호사협회 (278) : 1999

      9 한국투자신탁, "증권투자신탁업법개론" 1989

      10 정대익, "자산운용업자의 투자자보호의무 – 신인의무를 중심으로 –" 서울대학교금융법센터 71 : 2015

      1 한서희 ; 백설화, "해외 비트코인 상장지수집합투자기구(ETF) 사례 및 국내 비트코인 상장지수집합투자기구(ETF) 도입을 위한 논의" 한국증권법학회 23 (23): 183-220, 2022

      2 이중기, "투자신탁제도의 신탁적 요소와 조직계약적 요소" 한림대학교 법학연구소 9 : 2000

      3 맹수석, "투자신탁자산의 운용상 주의의무와 투자고객 보호방안" 한국증권법학회 6 (6): 175-208, 2005

      4 신명희 ; 권한용, "집합투자기구의 법적 구조에 대한 고찰 - 회사형 집합투자기구를 중심으로 -" 법과정책연구원 14 (14): 177-212, 2022

      5 오성근, "집합투자기구의 내부자거래 규제 - 미국의 뮤추얼펀드를 중심으로" 사법발전재단 1 (1): 69-121, 2015

      6 김인권, "집합투자(펀드)의 사례와 실무" 박영사 2023

      7 조현석, "지수투자신탁 운용자의 주의의무" 한국신탁학회 2 (2): 2020

      8 김건식, "증권투자신탁의 구조 : 계약형 투신과 회사형 투신을 중심으로" 대한변호사협회 (278) : 1999

      9 한국투자신탁, "증권투자신탁업법개론" 1989

      10 정대익, "자산운용업자의 투자자보호의무 – 신인의무를 중심으로 –" 서울대학교금융법센터 71 : 2015

      11 정대익, "자산운용업자의 투자자보호의무 - 법적 근거 및 금융투자상품의 출시·판매·운용단계상 의무를 중심으로-" 한국금융법학회 17 (17): 79-153, 2020

      12 자본시장통합법연구회, "자본시장통합법해설서" 한국증권업협회 2007

      13 김정수, "자본시장법원론" SFL그룹 2014

      14 김병연, "자본시장법상 금융투자회사의 신인의무를 통한 지배구조의 개선" 한국상사판례학회 35 (35): 171-206, 2022

      15 김병연, "자본시장법상 금융투자상품 규제체계" 대한변호사협회 (389) : 20-37, 2009

      16 김택주, "자본시장법강의" 국민대학교출판부 2002

      17 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법 주석서1" 2015

      18 김병연, "자본시장법 사례와 이론" 박영사 2020

      19 성희활, "자본시장법 강의(2022~2023)" 캐피털북스 2002

      20 김홍기, "자본시장법" 박영사 2021

      21 임재연, "자본시장법" 박영사 2023

      22 조상욱, "자본시장과 금융투자업에 관한 법률(안)상 집합투자규제의 주요 내용 및 문제점" 서울대학교금융법센터 (22) : 2007

      23 신광원, "금융투자상품 투자권유규제에 관한 연구" 동국대학교 2020

      24 오성근, "간접투자자산운용업법에 대한 고찰" 한국증권법학회 5 (5): 1-50, 2004

      25 飯田秀総, "金融商品取引法" 新制世社 2023

      26 松尾直彦, "金融商品取引法" 商事法務 2021

      27 神作裕之, "注釈金融商品取引法 第2巻" 金融財政事情研究会 2022

      28 田村 威, "投資信託基礎と実務" 経済法令研究会 2008

      29 투자신탁협회, "‘장 마감 후 거래(late trading)’와 ‘시차이용 단기매매(market timing)’ 관련 미국 규정 변화 및 시사점"

      30 Robert Cole, "Unit and Investment Trusts" 1997

      31 Kam Fan Sin, "The Legal Nature of the Unit Trust" 1997

      32 Thomas Lee Hazen, "The Law of Securities Regulation, 5th ed" Thomson West 2005

      33 Timothy C. Cornick, "Collective Investment Schemes – The Law and Practice" 2002

      34 M.F. Holzapfel, "An Analysts of The Section 3(a)(10) Exemption under The Securities Act of 1933 in The Context of The Public Offering Component of Section 3(c)(1) of The Investment Company Act of 1940" 427 : 2003

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼