RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    중간생략등기에 관한 고찰

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T826917

    • 저자
    • 발행사항

      서울 : 단국대학교 대학원 법학과 민사법전공, 1980

    • 학위논문사항

      학위논문(석사) -- 단국대학교

    • 발행연도

      1980

    • 작성언어

      한국어

    • 주제어
    • DDC

      345.86

    • 발행국(도시)

      서울

    • 형태사항

      84 p.

    • 소장기관
      • 건국대학교 상허기념도서관 소장기관정보
      • 국민대학교 성곡도서관 소장기관정보
      • 남서울대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 단국대학교 율곡기념도서관(천안) 소장기관정보
      • 단국대학교 퇴계기념도서관(중앙도서관) 소장기관정보
      • 동아대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 숙명여자대학교 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 연세대학교 학술문화처 도서관 소장기관정보
      • 원광대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 한국외국어대학교 서울캠퍼스 도서관 소장기관정보
    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Junggansaenglyakdeunggi is the registration that is omitted a part of the registration in the formalities of registration. For example, in case A dealt in his real estate to B, and B dealt in this real estate to C, C registered that C bought it from A, We call this registration A - C Junggansaenglyakdeunggi.
    Junggansaenglyakdeunggi has come into existence for the sake of the benefit of the concerned person (shortening of the cumbersome processes of the registration law, saving the taxes etc).
    Junggansaenglyakdeunggi should be invalid from the viewpoint of the ideal of the registration law that all process of the right alteration should be registered, but in a practical view, it should be validated because of it's being practised broadly and customarily. So, it is important that we should rather investigate the basis of Junggansaenglyakdaunggi than make clear that Junggansacnglyakdeunggi is valid or not.
    I have an eye on practising of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi broadly and customarily, I seek after the basis of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi in the customary law.
    It is different between the problem of the validity of having been done Junggansaenglyakdeunggi and the problem of the demand of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi. Though the demand of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi should be denied in view of the ideal of the law, it is right that we should acknowledge the demand of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi under the condition of intermediate person's consent because of the practising of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi and the subrogating of the demanding right of the registration.
    From the viewpoint of the actual affairs of the rcgistration, we should make an effort to show the intermediate person on the registerbook, because it promote the negative side of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi that Junggansaenglyakdeunggi gives difficulty cf finding the sources of taxes on account of unshowing the intermediate person on the registerbook, and as a method, it is right that we should make an effort to show the all intermediate cause of the registration on the registeredbook.
    번역하기

    Junggansaenglyakdeunggi is the registration that is omitted a part of the registration in the formalities of registration. For example, in case A dealt in his real estate to B, and B dealt in this real estate to C, C registered that C bought it from A...

    Junggansaenglyakdeunggi is the registration that is omitted a part of the registration in the formalities of registration. For example, in case A dealt in his real estate to B, and B dealt in this real estate to C, C registered that C bought it from A, We call this registration A - C Junggansaenglyakdeunggi.
    Junggansaenglyakdeunggi has come into existence for the sake of the benefit of the concerned person (shortening of the cumbersome processes of the registration law, saving the taxes etc).
    Junggansaenglyakdeunggi should be invalid from the viewpoint of the ideal of the registration law that all process of the right alteration should be registered, but in a practical view, it should be validated because of it's being practised broadly and customarily. So, it is important that we should rather investigate the basis of Junggansaenglyakdaunggi than make clear that Junggansacnglyakdeunggi is valid or not.
    I have an eye on practising of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi broadly and customarily, I seek after the basis of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi in the customary law.
    It is different between the problem of the validity of having been done Junggansaenglyakdeunggi and the problem of the demand of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi. Though the demand of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi should be denied in view of the ideal of the law, it is right that we should acknowledge the demand of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi under the condition of intermediate person's consent because of the practising of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi and the subrogating of the demanding right of the registration.
    From the viewpoint of the actual affairs of the rcgistration, we should make an effort to show the intermediate person on the registerbook, because it promote the negative side of Junggansaenglyakdeunggi that Junggansaenglyakdeunggi gives difficulty cf finding the sources of taxes on account of unshowing the intermediate person on the registerbook, and as a method, it is right that we should make an effort to show the all intermediate cause of the registration on the registeredbook.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 目次 = 0
    • 一. 序說 = 1
    • 1. 登記의 目的과 中間省略登記의 問題點 = 1
    • 2. 中間省略登記의 發生原因 = 5
    • 3. 慣行되는 中間省略登記의 一股的인 모습 = 6
    • 目次 = 0
    • 一. 序說 = 1
    • 1. 登記의 目的과 中間省略登記의 問題點 = 1
    • 2. 中間省略登記의 發生原因 = 5
    • 3. 慣行되는 中間省略登記의 一股的인 모습 = 6
    • 二. 中間省略登記의 槪念의 問題 = 7
    • 1. 序說 = 7
    • 2. 現行民法下에서의 中間省略登記의 槪念에 대한 學說對立 = 8
    • 3. 中間省略登記의槪念規定 = 10
    • 三. 中間省略登記의 有效性과 그 根據 (事後評價의 問題) = 13
    • 1. 意思主義下에서의 學說과 判例 = 13
    • 가. 判例 = 13
    • 나. 學說 = 17
    • 2. 形式主義下에서의 判例와 學說 = 20
    • 가. 獨逸에서의 判例와 學說 = 20
    • (1) 判例 = 21
    • (2) 學說 = 24
    • 나. 우리나라에서의 學說과 判例 = 24
    • (1) 序說 = 24
    • (2) 學說 = 25
    • (3) 判例 = 33
    • 3. 結 = 35
    • 四. 中間省略登記求權 = 46
    • 1. 序說 = 46
    • 2. 學說 = 46
    • 3. 判例 = 49
    • 4. 結 = 50
    • 5. 實務上의 取扱 = 57
    • 五. 中間者에게 歸屬되는 權利 = 66
    • 1. 動義權 抹消登記請求權 = 66
    • 2. 所有權 類似 權利 = 67
    • 六. 結論 = 74
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼