전국 청소년 위기실태 및 위기결과 분석 = Analysis of the Nationwide Survey on Youth Risks and Risk Results

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The number of youth at risk is not only rising every year but also increasingly being complicated and worse. A nationwide survey on youth at risk was conducted to acquire data reflecting young adults` risk situation recently emerging and providing the foundation to help build a database in respect to the youth at risk and the use of the development of policy and support programs for adolescent by conducting a nationwide survey on youth at risk. With the definition of the term, youth at risk, the tool to investigate youth risks depending on three groups which were children, teenagers, and young adults who were vulnerable to be at risk was developed. 83,353 normal students and 6,463 at-risk students participated in the study. Thereafter, by using the standard of Angoff`s method, the risk level was divided into 4 groups: high-risk group, risk group, potential risk group, and normal group. The results showed that 0.51% (21,790) of normal students was high-risk, 1.73% (74,365) was risk, 4.93% (641,914) was potential risk, and 82.83% (3,361,103 participants) was normal. The results of at-risk youth exhibited that 4.99% (4,558) was high-risk, 8.11% (7,402) was risk, 29.51% (26,941) was potential risk and 57.39% (52,387) was normal. This study aims at examining relationship between the level of risk and the risk result by analyzing the demographic trait, gender, the risk levels classified by schools. The study suggests that government`s support policies should be diversified, predications for problems of at-risk youth and efforts to swiftly respond to the youth risks by using data should be essential, and the intervention tailored by the level of risk, depending on types of youth problems should be required.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 윤철경, "한국의 위기청소년 지원정책 진단 및 정책과제" 청소년위원회, OECD 69-97, 2005

2 황혜원, "초기 청소년의 학교폭력에 대한 생태체계적 요인들 간의 경로분석" 한국아동권리학회 10 (10): 497-526, 2006

3 이상균, "청소년의 학교비행에 대한 생태체계적 영향요인" 15 : 109-132, 2000

4 전영천, "청소년의 음주행동 및 흡연행동의 위험요인에 관한 연구" 1 : 89-109, 2010

5 진혜민, "청소년비행 관련변인에 관한 메타분석" 한국청소년복지학회 14 (14): 193-221, 2012

6 정묘순, "청소년 자살시도 예측변인: 자살위기 청소년을 중심으로" 한국청소년정책연구원 25 (25): 145-171, 2014

7 김보영, "청소년 자살생각 관련변인에 관한 메타분석" 한국간호과학회 39 (39): 651-661, 2009

8 한상철, "청소년 가출의 위험요인과 보호요인 탐색" 한국문화및사회문제심리학회 14 : 273-298, 2008

9 오승환, "청소년 가출에 대한 생태체계적 영향 요인 -가출충동과 가출경험을 중심으로-" 한국청소년복지학회 12 (12): 301-324, 2010

10 강근모, "청소년 가출관련변인의 메타분석" 한국청소년정책연구원 26 (26): 115-144, 2015

11 강석영, "전국 청소년 위기상황 실태조사" 한국청소년상담원 2009

12 윤철경, "위기청소년 지역사회 안전망 실태와 발전방안" 한국청소년개발원 2006

13 지승희, "위기청소년 실태조사 연구" 한국청소년상담원 2006

14 구본용, "위기(가능)청소년지원모델 개발연구" 청소년위원회 2005

15 권재환, "남녀 청소년의 충동성, 부모의 양육태도, 개인의 통제력, 부모-자녀 의사소통이 문제행동에 미치는 영향" 한국청소년정책연구원 17 (17): 325-351, 2006

16 홍세희, "구조 방정식 모형의 적합도 지수 선정기준과 그 근거" 19 : 161-177, 2000

17 심우엽, "고등학생의 외모만족도와 행복감 관계에서 스트레스에 대한 적극적 대처의 매개효과" 교육연구원 28 (28): 101-121, 2012

18 Bronfenbrenner, U., "The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design" Havard University Press 1979

19 AERA, "Standards for educational and psychological testing" American Psychological Association 1999

20 Garmezy N. A, "Risk and protective factors in the development of psychopathology" Cambridge University Press 527-534, 1990

21 Horowitz, F. D., "Exploring developmental theories: Toward a structural/behavioral model of development" Erlbaum 1987

22 Angoff, W. H., "Educational measurement" 1971

23 Burt, M. R., "Comprehensive Service Integration Programs for at-Risk Youth" Urban Institute 1992

24 Evans, P., "Community-based Approaches and Cross-sectoral Partnerships for Youths at Risk in OECD Countries" 3-16, 2005

25 Lahav. C., "Children and Youth at Risk & a Case Study in Israel: An Overview - 2005" 134-146, 2005

26 Lerner, R. M., "Changing organism context relations as the basic process of development: A developmental-contextual perspective" 27 : 27-32, 1991

27 Cronbach, L. S., "Alpha coefficients for stratified-parallel tests" 25 : 291-312, 1965

28 배주미, "2010년 전국 청소년 위기 실태조사" 한국청소년상담원 2010