RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지혜 개념과 그 계발 = The Concept of Wisdom and It's Development

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82512474

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The aim of this study is to clarify the concept of wisdom and it's development in terms of leadership educationally, philosophically, analytically. Wisdom is a way of being and is fundamentally practical in a complex and uncertain world. Wisdom is concerned less with how much we know and more with what we do and how we act. Wisdom is characterized as uncommon, common sense, being able to see the forest as well as the trees. The practical wisdom we describe is not the luxury of unworldly sages. Wisdom comes from vision, generosity, patience, right effort, mindfulness, discernment, and clarity. Wisdom is essentially practical. Wisdom is dependent on ethics, judgement, insight, creativity, imagination, and foresight, and the competence to contribute to the community. Wisdom is concerned less with how much we know and more with what we do and how we act. Wisdom is fundamentally practical in a complex and uncertain world. Wisdom requires knowledge but not necessarily a great accumulation of it. While knowledge that is constantly changing helps us decide and solve, it also produces ambiguity and complexity. Wise leaders allow for non-rational and subjective elements when making decisions. Wise leaders occasionally acknowledge the sensory and visceral as important components of decision-making and judgment. Wise leaders have a metaphysical, even spiritual, quality that does not bind them absolutely to the rules of reason thereby enabling vision, insight and foresight. Because wise leaders are humane, they produce virtuous and tolerant decisions. Wise leaders reason carefully and logically, use good judgment to reach better decisions. Wise leaders allow for non-rational and subjective elements when making decisions. Because wise leaders are humane, they produce virtuous and tolerant decisions. Wise people as leaders respect experience and tradition. They have a capacity to deal effectively with uncertainty. The interpersonal leader's task is “to smooth the path of human interaction.”The institutional leader's task, however, is “the promotion and protection of values.” In conclusion, wisdom is particularly appropriate to contemporary leadership. Understanding and developing wisdom-centerd leadership practice is required in education society. The methods to cultivate the wisdom are knowledge, study, reflection, experience, communication, discipline, application, insight, discovery, interpretation, meditation and concentration.
    번역하기

    The aim of this study is to clarify the concept of wisdom and it's development in terms of leadership educationally, philosophically, analytically. Wisdom is a way of being and is fundamentally practical in a complex and uncertain world. Wisdom is con...

    The aim of this study is to clarify the concept of wisdom and it's development in terms of leadership educationally, philosophically, analytically. Wisdom is a way of being and is fundamentally practical in a complex and uncertain world. Wisdom is concerned less with how much we know and more with what we do and how we act. Wisdom is characterized as uncommon, common sense, being able to see the forest as well as the trees. The practical wisdom we describe is not the luxury of unworldly sages. Wisdom comes from vision, generosity, patience, right effort, mindfulness, discernment, and clarity. Wisdom is essentially practical. Wisdom is dependent on ethics, judgement, insight, creativity, imagination, and foresight, and the competence to contribute to the community. Wisdom is concerned less with how much we know and more with what we do and how we act. Wisdom is fundamentally practical in a complex and uncertain world. Wisdom requires knowledge but not necessarily a great accumulation of it. While knowledge that is constantly changing helps us decide and solve, it also produces ambiguity and complexity. Wise leaders allow for non-rational and subjective elements when making decisions. Wise leaders occasionally acknowledge the sensory and visceral as important components of decision-making and judgment. Wise leaders have a metaphysical, even spiritual, quality that does not bind them absolutely to the rules of reason thereby enabling vision, insight and foresight. Because wise leaders are humane, they produce virtuous and tolerant decisions. Wise leaders reason carefully and logically, use good judgment to reach better decisions. Wise leaders allow for non-rational and subjective elements when making decisions. Because wise leaders are humane, they produce virtuous and tolerant decisions. Wise people as leaders respect experience and tradition. They have a capacity to deal effectively with uncertainty. The interpersonal leader's task is “to smooth the path of human interaction.”The institutional leader's task, however, is “the promotion and protection of values.” In conclusion, wisdom is particularly appropriate to contemporary leadership. Understanding and developing wisdom-centerd leadership practice is required in education society. The methods to cultivate the wisdom are knowledge, study, reflection, experience, communication, discipline, application, insight, discovery, interpretation, meditation and concentration.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서언
    • Ⅱ. 지혜의 개념
    • Ⅲ. 지혜의 계발
    • Ⅳ. 결언 : 지혜의 리더십
    • 참고문헌
    • Ⅰ. 서언
    • Ⅱ. 지혜의 개념
    • Ⅲ. 지혜의 계발
    • Ⅳ. 결언 : 지혜의 리더십
    • 참고문헌
    • Abstract
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 고영건, "한국인의 정서적 지혜: 한의 삭힘" 한국학중앙연구원 28 (28): 255-290, 2005

    2 노안영, "한국과 미국의 상담심리학자들이 지각하는 지혜의 비교" 9 (9): 217-243, 1998

    3 Trine, R. W., "탁월한 지혜" 오죽헌 1992

    4 박영주, "초등도덕교육의 목적으로 본 실천적 지혜" 11 : 107-125, 2009

    5 이수림, "질적 분석을 통한 상담과정 중 내담자 지혜 발달 연구" 한국상담심리학회 21 (21): 791-813, 2009

    6 Goenka, S. N., "지혜의 개발 - 비파사나 수행법" 길 출판사 1994

    7 송남순, "지혜를 키우는 교육" 156 : 442-450, 1989

    8 김종욱, "지식에서 지혜로: 지식기반사회에 대한 불교적 성찰" 대한철학회 99 : 109-132, 2006

    9 김광률, "오늘의 대학생을 위한 지혜교육" 한국대학선교학회 (17) : 143-170, 2009

    10 김기수, "아리스토텔레스의 실천적 지혜와 교육의 실제" 17 : 9-27, 1997

    1 고영건, "한국인의 정서적 지혜: 한의 삭힘" 한국학중앙연구원 28 (28): 255-290, 2005

    2 노안영, "한국과 미국의 상담심리학자들이 지각하는 지혜의 비교" 9 (9): 217-243, 1998

    3 Trine, R. W., "탁월한 지혜" 오죽헌 1992

    4 박영주, "초등도덕교육의 목적으로 본 실천적 지혜" 11 : 107-125, 2009

    5 이수림, "질적 분석을 통한 상담과정 중 내담자 지혜 발달 연구" 한국상담심리학회 21 (21): 791-813, 2009

    6 Goenka, S. N., "지혜의 개발 - 비파사나 수행법" 길 출판사 1994

    7 송남순, "지혜를 키우는 교육" 156 : 442-450, 1989

    8 김종욱, "지식에서 지혜로: 지식기반사회에 대한 불교적 성찰" 대한철학회 99 : 109-132, 2006

    9 김광률, "오늘의 대학생을 위한 지혜교육" 한국대학선교학회 (17) : 143-170, 2009

    10 김기수, "아리스토텔레스의 실천적 지혜와 교육의 실제" 17 : 9-27, 1997

    11 최재경, "송복교수의 고별강의" 2002

    12 한준상, "생의 가(痂)" 학지사 2009

    13 이병주, "동양사상과 경영" 성균관대학교 유교문화연구소 2005

    14 Ylimaki, R. M., "Wisdom-centred educational leadership" 12 (12): 13-33, 2009

    15 McKenna, B., "Wisdom principles as a meta-theoretical basis for evaluating leadership" 20 : 177-190, 2009

    16 Sternberg, R. J., "Wisdom : its nature, origins, and development" Cambridge University Press 1990

    17 Wang, P., "Top management perception of strategic information processing in a turbulent environment" 16 (16): 33-43, 1995

    18 Winter, S., "The competitive challenge: strategies for industrial innovation and renewal" Ballinger 1987

    19 Schwenk, C. R., "The cognitive perspective on strategic decision making" 25 : 4-655, 1988

    20 Kihlstrom, J. F., "Social intelligence. in: Handbook of intelligence" Cambridge University Press 2000

    21 Avolio, B. J., "Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire" 72 : 441-462, 1999

    22 Rooney, D., "Public policy in knowledge-based economies: Foundations and frameworks" Edward Elgar 2003

    23 Srivastva, S., "Organizational wisdom and executive courage" The New Lexington Press 1998

    24 Aristotle, "Nicomachean ethics" The Peripatetic Press 1984

    25 Weick, K. E., "Mundane poetics: Searching for wisdom in organization studies" 25 : 658-668, 2004

    26 Eflin, J., "Epistemic presuppositions and their consequences" 34 : 48-67, 2003

    27 Rogers, E. M., "Diffusion of innovations" 1980

    28 Bigelow, J., "Developing managerial wisdom" 1 : 143-153, 1992

    29 Crisp, R., "Aristotle: Ethics and politics From Aristotle to Augustine, Vol. 2" Routledge 1997

    30 Goodwin, V. L., "A test of relationships in a model of organizational cognitive complexity" 19 : 371-386, 1998

    31 Sternberg, R. J., "A model of educational leadership: Wisdom, intelligence, and creativity, synthesized" 8 (8): 347-364, 2005

    32 Baltes, P. B., "A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence" 55 : 122-136, 2000

    33 Sternberg, R. J., "A balance theory of wisdom" 2 : 347-365, 1998

    34 Rooney, D., "A Model of the materia l, mental, historical and social character of knowledge. in: The handbook on the knowledge economy" Edward Elgar 9-36, 2005

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-09 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Philosophy of Education KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.55 0.55 0.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.54 0.61 0.998 0.11
    더보기
    해외이동버튼