특집 1 개념으로 보는 해방 전후사 -문학,정치,일상 : 해방의 우울과 퇴폐,거세된 남성성 사이의 명랑 -정비석의 『장미의 계절』과 『도회의 정열』을 중심으로 = Cheerfulness between Melancholy in Liberation and Emasculated Masculinity -Focus on Season of Roses and Passion in Cities by Biseok Jung

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article focused on Biseok Jung`s sense of post-politic in his works using the word, cheerfulness, from the liberation of Korea to Korean war. Jung`s sense of post-politic appeared to be as acceptance of The Century of Fact, fatalism, and necessarianism. After-colonial area, the space of liberation, was the period which was full of the will to handle the matter of post-politic and establishment of nation-State by the main agents themselves who were liberated. It was difficult decision to clean up the pervading vestiges of Japanese imperialism. However, it was also necessary to be a man as a citizen of modern nation-State. If we call this a movement of denaturalization or denaturing of human nature, Jung`s work was against this movement. Masculinity, which authors who argued Jung`s work had pointed,was not the same as man as a citizen. The definition of man as a citizen came out when the term, man, was considered in relation to modern political matters. The term, man, which Jung used, was referred to a masculinity which means a sexually dominant order, and a masculinity is similar to the fascist system. These two types of masculinity were incompatible. By considering two types of masculinity, we can see clearly what Jung`s definition of masculinity has hidden. Two of Jung`s work, Jangmiuigyejul(Season of Roses) and Dohoeuijeongyeol (Passion in Cities), were written during the period when the sovereignty was being determined by external influence and a few number of representatives as a movement of establishing single government in Korea was raging. That is, they were written after 1947. However, the request for the people`s sovereignty had not begin to wane. Uprising in Daegu, resistance in Jeju, on April 3rd,, 1947, and the Yeosu-Suncheon Incident are these examples. Jung used the term, cheerfulness, as the way Lee government did. But the term, cheerfulness, was used to hide social anxiety and rebellious aspects of society. Therefore, revealing for what cheerfulness was would cause crack in stability of Korean society. Cheerfulness in Season of Roses showed the point of rupture. But the term, cheerfulness, had gone to a negative one in Passion in Cities. Instead, womanhood was used as a positive term. It is because cheerfulness was on the border defining the boundary of governance and womanhood was more stable than cheerfulness. And the term, cheerfulness, was inside of governance. This was another representation of ``tamed man`` or ``small man`` which Jung had since the Japanese colonial area.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 천정환, "해방기 거리의 정치와 표상의 생산" 상허학회 26 : 55-102, 2009

2 오영식, "해방기 간행도서 총목록 : 1945~1950" 소명 2009

3 김무용, "해방 후 조선공산당의 노선과 조선인민공화국" 고려사학회 9 : 2000

4 권영민, "한국현대문학대사전" 서울대학교출판부 2004

5 브루스 커밍스, "한국전쟁의 기원 上·下" 청사 1986

6 이혜령, "한국소설과 골상학적 타자들" 소명 2007

7 존 다우어, "패배를 껴안고" 민음사 2012

8 레이먼드 윌리엄즈, "키워드" 민음사 2010

9 이중연, "책, 사실에서 풀리다 : 해방기 책의 문화사" 혜안 2005

10 라인하르트 코젤렉, "지나간 미래" 문학동네 1999

11 정종현, "제국의 기억과 전유 - 1940년대 한국문학의 연속과 비연속" 어문학사 2012

12 이선미, "정비석 연구" 소명 2013

13 소영현, "전쟁이라는 문턱" 그린비출판사 2010

14 정비석, "자유부인" 지식을만드는지식 2013

15 퀜틴 스키너, "의미와 콘텍스트" 아르케 1999

16 김철, "우울한 형/명랑한 동생－중일 전쟁기 ‘신세대 논쟁’의 재독(再讀)" 상허학회 25 : 98-121, 2009

17 공임순, "스캔들과 반공국가주의" 앨피 2010

18 소래섭, "불온한 경성은 명랑하라" 웅진지식하우스 2011

19 "동아일보"

20 "경향신문"

21 나인호, "개념사란 무엇인가-역사와 언어의 새로운 만남" 역사비평사 2011

22 정비석, "都會의 情熱" 평범사 1957

23 정비석, "薔薇의 季節" 대조사 1954

24 "新世代論의 眞義" 1940

25 정비석, "故苑" 백민문화사 1946

26 정비석, "三代" 1940

27 이혜령, "‘해방기’ 식민기억의 한 양상과 젠더" 한국여성문학학회 19 (19): 233-266, 2008

28 김남천, "1945년 8.15" 작가들 2007