두 문화-문화과학과 자연과학 그리고 인간 : 카시러와 부버의 논의를 중심으로 = Two Cultures – Cultural Science, Natural Science, and the Human Being : Focusing on the Views of Cassirer and Buber

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This article aims to reveal differences between natural science and cultural science based on a phenomenology of perception and to suggest the logic and task of the cultural sciences. And we will analyze causes of the crisis of contemporary culture and a broken human relationship. In this context, Cassirer pointed out the differences between natural science and cultural science, that is, perception of things and perception of expression, subject-pole and ego-pole, thing-world and person-world, and absolute-other and alter-ego in terms of an analysis of the phenomenology of perception. Martin Buber pointed out the relations among people. His philosophy of “I and Thou” suggests an analysis on the existence of human Being. He distinguishes three types of “I and Thou.” The first is relation of “I and It,” that is, in this relation we deal with the Alter Ego as with a thing. Secondly in the relation of “I and You,” we deal with a human Being as with a person. Thirdly in the relation of “I and Thou,” we deal a human Being as with an Eternal Being or an Eternal You. In this discussion, Buber emphasizes meeting, dialogue, and relation among people. Buber’s philosophy of “I and Thou” is very important in the study of the cultural sciences.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 들어가며: 두 문화
• Ⅱ. 카시러, 자연과학과 문화과학의 차이를 드러내기 위해 지각(知覺) 현상을 분석하다
• Ⅲ . 부버, 문화양상과 인간관계 해명을 위해 <나-너>관계를 분석하다
• Ⅳ. 문화과학, 고유한 내적 논리와 과제는 무엇인가?
• Ⅴ. 나가며: 문화과학, 문화위기와 인간관계 단절에 어떤 기여를 할 수 있을까?
• Works Cited
• Abstract