RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    쉥겐조약과 유럽시민권 = Schengen Agreement and European Citizenship.

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104208519

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Schengen Agreement and European Identity

    Kyu-Young LEE Associate Professor, Graduate School of International Studies, Sogang University


    The Schengen Agreement is one of the most important process, through which the European Integration could be promoted with more relative rapidity than ever and, in that sense, the European Identity could be also mobilized among the member states of the European Union. However, the European Identity is not to replace the established national identities of individual European states.
    The Schengen Agreement was signed by five states, France, Germany, Belgium, Luxemburg, Netherlands in 1985 and came into force since 1995. But by 2001 ten more states had joined it. The Schengen Agreement aimed at abolishing of internal border and strengthening of external border like the Single European Act which became effective since July 1, 1989. With the SEA the European Union sought after the borderless area and tried to take off controls within the internal area regardless of nationalities.
    The Schengen Agreement should be a milestone for building the European Identity. But the free movement by the Schengen movement was not possible without complementary measures regarding the multilateral security, like the Schengen Informations System I, SIRENE, and the Schengen Information System II etc.
    Building the European identity could be more concretely based on the Schengen Agreement by abolishing control on the internal borders and permitting free movement among member states. But these measures were only the elementary one for the realization of the European Identity. It means that the free movement within the member states could be guaranteed, if the international crimes or the security problems were resolved.
    번역하기

    Schengen Agreement and European Identity Kyu-Young LEE Associate Professor, Graduate School of International Studies, Sogang University The Schengen Agreement is one of the most important process, through which the European Integration could be pro...

    Schengen Agreement and European Identity

    Kyu-Young LEE Associate Professor, Graduate School of International Studies, Sogang University


    The Schengen Agreement is one of the most important process, through which the European Integration could be promoted with more relative rapidity than ever and, in that sense, the European Identity could be also mobilized among the member states of the European Union. However, the European Identity is not to replace the established national identities of individual European states.
    The Schengen Agreement was signed by five states, France, Germany, Belgium, Luxemburg, Netherlands in 1985 and came into force since 1995. But by 2001 ten more states had joined it. The Schengen Agreement aimed at abolishing of internal border and strengthening of external border like the Single European Act which became effective since July 1, 1989. With the SEA the European Union sought after the borderless area and tried to take off controls within the internal area regardless of nationalities.
    The Schengen Agreement should be a milestone for building the European Identity. But the free movement by the Schengen movement was not possible without complementary measures regarding the multilateral security, like the Schengen Informations System I, SIRENE, and the Schengen Information System II etc.
    Building the European identity could be more concretely based on the Schengen Agreement by abolishing control on the internal borders and permitting free movement among member states. But these measures were only the elementary one for the realization of the European Identity. It means that the free movement within the member states could be guaranteed, if the international crimes or the security problems were resolved.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.32 0.32 0.41
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.43 0.42 0.639 0.14
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼