RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    공적 연금 체제의 빈곤완화 효과 연구 = An Analysis on Poverty Reduction Effects of Public Pension Regimes

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A45031593

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    There is nearly universal agreement in today that it is the responsibility of national governments to provide old age pension for the sake of old age income security. In this context, most governments have public pension programs. Despite this commonalities, there is striking diversity among countries in how systems of public pension are organized. Systems of public pension vary in the relative importance of public programs, the number of public programs, the degree to which benefits are tied to contributions associated with paid labor, and in many other ways. Focusing on public pension regimes which are classified with the types of pension programs, this study analyses on the antipoverty effectiveness of 8 countries` public pension regimes using US database. The result shows that different public pension regimes produce very different anti-poverty results. The less spending budgets and the more targeting benefits at the poor results in higher poverty rates. But, a country like Canada has a very efficient pension regime which produce a low poverty rate for a modest level of spending. Therefore, Korean government can learn much from the successes of other nations in providing an adequate income in old age, perhaps especially from Canada.
    번역하기

    There is nearly universal agreement in today that it is the responsibility of national governments to provide old age pension for the sake of old age income security. In this context, most governments have public pension programs. Despite this commona...

    There is nearly universal agreement in today that it is the responsibility of national governments to provide old age pension for the sake of old age income security. In this context, most governments have public pension programs. Despite this commonalities, there is striking diversity among countries in how systems of public pension are organized. Systems of public pension vary in the relative importance of public programs, the number of public programs, the degree to which benefits are tied to contributions associated with paid labor, and in many other ways. Focusing on public pension regimes which are classified with the types of pension programs, this study analyses on the antipoverty effectiveness of 8 countries` public pension regimes using US database. The result shows that different public pension regimes produce very different anti-poverty results. The less spending budgets and the more targeting benefits at the poor results in higher poverty rates. But, a country like Canada has a very efficient pension regime which produce a low poverty rate for a modest level of spending. Therefore, Korean government can learn much from the successes of other nations in providing an adequate income in old age, perhaps especially from Canada.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국의 사회복지체제 연구 국가-시장-공동체의 결합구조" 서울: 나남출판사 1999

    2 "공적소득이전의 소득재분배효과 측정방법의 문제점에 관한 탐색적 일고찰" (제24호) : 73-92, 2004

    3 "공적 연금 유형의 국제비교(II) 이태리, 스위스, 핀란드, 덴마크, 체코를 중심으로" 서울: 국민연금관리공단 국민연금연구센터 2001

    4 "The Value of Pension Entitlements: A Model of Nine OECD Countries" (No. 9) : 2003

    5 "The Rising Tide Lifts..?" in Understanding Poverty" Cambridge: Harvard University Press 97-126, 2001

    6 "The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality; Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries" Vol. 63 : 661-687, 1998

    7 "Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies" New York: Oxford University Press 2000

    8 "Review of Income and Wealth" 115-142, 1988

    9 "Responding to Need A Comparison of Social Safety Nets in Canada and the United States in Small Differences that Matter Labour Markets and Income Maintenance in Canada and the United States edited by D University of Chicago Press" 1993191-231

    10 "Income Transfers in Ten Welfare States" 1991

    1 "한국의 사회복지체제 연구 국가-시장-공동체의 결합구조" 서울: 나남출판사 1999

    2 "공적소득이전의 소득재분배효과 측정방법의 문제점에 관한 탐색적 일고찰" (제24호) : 73-92, 2004

    3 "공적 연금 유형의 국제비교(II) 이태리, 스위스, 핀란드, 덴마크, 체코를 중심으로" 서울: 국민연금관리공단 국민연금연구센터 2001

    4 "The Value of Pension Entitlements: A Model of Nine OECD Countries" (No. 9) : 2003

    5 "The Rising Tide Lifts..?" in Understanding Poverty" Cambridge: Harvard University Press 97-126, 2001

    6 "The Paradox of Redistribution and Strategies of Equality; Welfare State Institutions, Inequality, and Poverty in the Western Countries" Vol. 63 : 661-687, 1998

    7 "Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies" New York: Oxford University Press 2000

    8 "Review of Income and Wealth" 115-142, 1988

    9 "Responding to Need A Comparison of Social Safety Nets in Canada and the United States in Small Differences that Matter Labour Markets and Income Maintenance in Canada and the United States edited by D University of Chicago Press" 1993191-231

    10 "Income Transfers in Ten Welfare States" 1991

    11 "Income Maintenance in Old Age; What can be learned from Cross-national Comparisons" (No. 263) : 2001

    12 "How Changes in Transfer Systems of Canada and the United States Explain the Divergence in Household Poverty Levels from 1974-1994" (No. 271) : 2001

    13 "Development and Crisis of the Welfare State Parties and Politics in Global Markets" Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2001

    14 "Changes in Family Structure Implications for Poverty and Related Policy edited by S" Harvard University Press 69-96,

    15 "Averting the Old Age Crisis; Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth" World Bank Oxford University Press 1994

    16 "Anti-poverty Effectiveness of Taxes and Income transfers in Welfare States" Vol. 53 (Vol. 53): 105-129, 2000

    17 "A New Old Age Pension, in Reform of Retirement Income Policy; International and Canadian Perspectives" Kingston: School of Policy studies 135-190, 1996

    18 ".『공적 연금 유형의 국제비교(I) 주요국 이원연금체계를 중심으로" 서울: 국민연금관리공단 국민연금연구센터 2000

    19 ""Retirement Income Systems; The Reform Process Across OECD Countries" 3 (3): 1998

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.05 1.05 1.02
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.1 1.15 1.323 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼