RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      학교 교육과정 평가 모형의 구안과 시 , 도 교육청 평가 실제의 분석 = Constructing an school - curriculum evaluation model and analyzing the evaluation practices of school - curriculum in sixteen Local Education Authorities

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A19679257

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      There will be a consensus on considering evaluation crucial to the health of education and its programs. In the last decade, since the introduction of school-based curriculum system by the 6th revision of curriculum for elementary and secondary education, there has been a growing tendency to demand that the results of curriculum activities be identified and communicated among stakeholders of education. This is linked to a new emphasis of the importance of education and making the schools accountable. To meet such a tendency requires that educators conceive and carry out an effective evaluation and reporting process of evaluation results. In general, evaluation is a process or cluster of processes that people perform to gather data that will enable them to decide worth or merit of something. Applied to curriculum, evaluation focuses on determining whether the curriculum as developed and implemented is producing or can produce the desired results. In this vein, curriculum evaluation will be essential activities to improve the existing curriculum by using objective and empirical data-gathering methods. In this study, for the purpose of clarifying the complex meanings of curriculum evaluation as an terminology of education, an school-curriculum evaluation model was constructed in terms of purposes, objects, and methodologies of curriculum evaluation, which was depicted by a cubic model composed of 144 cells. This cubic model of curriculum evaluation can be used as a sort of conceptual scheme to guide designing and implementing of evaluation of a particular thing. And furthermore, this study tried to analyze and compare the practices of school-curriculum evaluation respectively conducted by 16 Offices of Education. In order to identify the current state of curriculum evaluation, the 2001 Self-Evaluation Report of the 7th School Curriclum prepared by local authority of education so-called Office of Education was analyzed in terms of purpose or philosophy, objects or elements, and methods of curriculum evaluation, and compared with each other by the technique of document analysis.
      번역하기

      There will be a consensus on considering evaluation crucial to the health of education and its programs. In the last decade, since the introduction of school-based curriculum system by the 6th revision of curriculum for elementary and secondary educat...

      There will be a consensus on considering evaluation crucial to the health of education and its programs. In the last decade, since the introduction of school-based curriculum system by the 6th revision of curriculum for elementary and secondary education, there has been a growing tendency to demand that the results of curriculum activities be identified and communicated among stakeholders of education. This is linked to a new emphasis of the importance of education and making the schools accountable. To meet such a tendency requires that educators conceive and carry out an effective evaluation and reporting process of evaluation results. In general, evaluation is a process or cluster of processes that people perform to gather data that will enable them to decide worth or merit of something. Applied to curriculum, evaluation focuses on determining whether the curriculum as developed and implemented is producing or can produce the desired results. In this vein, curriculum evaluation will be essential activities to improve the existing curriculum by using objective and empirical data-gathering methods. In this study, for the purpose of clarifying the complex meanings of curriculum evaluation as an terminology of education, an school-curriculum evaluation model was constructed in terms of purposes, objects, and methodologies of curriculum evaluation, which was depicted by a cubic model composed of 144 cells. This cubic model of curriculum evaluation can be used as a sort of conceptual scheme to guide designing and implementing of evaluation of a particular thing. And furthermore, this study tried to analyze and compare the practices of school-curriculum evaluation respectively conducted by 16 Offices of Education. In order to identify the current state of curriculum evaluation, the 2001 Self-Evaluation Report of the 7th School Curriclum prepared by local authority of education so-called Office of Education was analyzed in terms of purpose or philosophy, objects or elements, and methods of curriculum evaluation, and compared with each other by the technique of document analysis.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-05-31 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> The Journal of Curriculum Studies KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 등재 신청제한 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 2.81 2.81 2.75
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      2.65 2.69 3.561 0.48
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼