綜合科學으로서의 秘書學 硏究方法論 : 理論體係 確立을 위한 問題點을 中心으로 a preliminary sketch = An Interdisciplinary approach to Secretarial Science

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to exiamne the possibility of a systematic theory and methodology for developing an interisciplinary apporach to secretarial science. As a branch of the applied social sciences, secretarial science has had problems which have resulted from disagreements on the concept of "secretary". As Professor Maurice Duverger of the University of Paris has observed, there is a striking contrast between the effectivemess of the applied social sciences and the anarchic state of their theory.
As in the case of all other social sciences, secretarial science suffers from a confusion on its hiatory and philosophy. This has produced two results: firstly, a mixture of the analysis of objective facts with the affirmation of normative principles; secondly, the predominance of a priori "practically". Therefore, secretarial science, as a discipline, is seen both as a science(theory) and an art(practicality). Historically , in response to practical needs, social sciences have been developing logic, methodology and standard of relevance for scientific inquiry.
In order further to refine the concept of secretary, it seems useful to begin by defining the concept of administration in generic terms, as a common social process involving certain common secretarial activities. These activities, which usually include decision-making, programming, staffing wothput supervision, may be seen in most forms of business or public adminintration as well. Indeed, to some extent, the differences betweem administration and secretarial service come to rest largly in the respective environment of each.
The office of the secretary may be defined as that aspect of administration occuring under the formal aegis of administrative organization at every level. While reconizing the validity of secretarial science as a subfield in the study of public and business administration, we do not believe that it involves the analysis of administration(management) in all its forms and in all human groups. We must define a "Secretarial service" differently than the way it is commonly defined. For some, secretarial service mat be characterized by its ultimate practicality. For others, it may be seen as a administrative or managerial science. However, secretarial service should be seen as neithe of these. It should be defined as something falling between public and business administration, in other wprds, as staff service within the framework of organization. The study of secretarial science should start from this point.
Because secretarial science is, as mentioned above, a generalized human activity concered with ordering the men and materials required to achieve organizational goals, it has drown widly from the various social sciences. However, it is impossible to gain any adequate perspective of the field without tracing its background in the areas of public and business administration. Traditionally, the analysis of the field has reflected certain dominant contemporary trends in public and business administrative sciences which are usually recongnized as the parent discioline of the field. Each of these to be superseded as analytical tools and fashions change.
An interdisciplinary apptoach represents an amalgam of all such styles: as role structural approach, behavioral approach and social philosophical approach.
A new secretarial science as one of the applied social sciences should be pursued at the university level by adopting this interdisciplinary approach.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 序說
• 1. 問題의 提起
• 2. 硏究의 目的 및 方向
• Ⅱ. 秘書學의 科學性과 槪念構造
• 1. 諸社會科學에서 單一科學으로서의 秘書學의 可能性
• 2. 管理科學으로서의 秘書學의 性格
• 3. 秘書의 諸 槪念構造 分析
• 4. 科學으로서의 秘書學의 問題點
• Ⅲ. 秘書學 理論體系의 方向
• 1. 社會科學으로서의 秘書學의 硏究方向
• 2. 理想的 秘書像의 倫理的 定型化
• Ⅳ. 綜合科學으로서의 秘書學의 可能性-方法論的 考察-
• 1. 役割構造論的 接近法
• 2. 行態科學的 接近法
• 3. 社會哲學的 折衷 및 補完
• Ⅴ. 倫理體系 確立을 위한 秘書學敎育의 科學化
• 1. 硏究方法論에 의한 倫理的 接近
• 2. 學問體系 設定을 위한 大學秘書學과 敎科課程의 理想的 模型
• Ⅵ. 要約 및 結論
• 參考文獻