RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      시몽동의 구체화 이론을 통해 본 인공지능 생성예술: 구체화의 적용 가능성과 한계 탐색 = AI Generative Art through Simondon's Concretization Theory: Exploring the Applicability and Limitations of Concretization

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110142254

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This study began by analyzing the development of AI technology and the creative process of AI-generated art through the framework of Gilbert Simondon's philosophy of technology. The purpose of this study was to critically explore the possibilities and limitations of applying Simondon's theory of concretization to the development of AI technology and AI generative art. Therefore, this paper shifted to examining how the process of concretization, in which a technological object evolves from an "abstract mode" to a "concrete mode," as Simondon described it, fits with AI technology and AI-generated art. The results and contents of this study are as follows. First, while AI technology has advanced by leveraging computing resources and big data, it differs from Simondon's concept of concretization in that the learning and inference stages are clearly separated and the inference stage operates as a fixed mathematical function. Second, the prompt-based conditioning in AI generative art fundamentally differs from Simondon's concept of associated millieu. Third, collaboration between artists and AI should be reconceptualized as a human-AI collaborative system, rather than the formation of associated millieu. Based on the results of this study, we demonstrate that AI is a new form of technological entity distinct from both physical technological objects and traditional tools. We also hope to critically apply Simondon's theory of concretization to AI generative art.
      번역하기

      This study began by analyzing the development of AI technology and the creative process of AI-generated art through the framework of Gilbert Simondon's philosophy of technology. The purpose of this study was to critically explore the possibilities and...

      This study began by analyzing the development of AI technology and the creative process of AI-generated art through the framework of Gilbert Simondon's philosophy of technology. The purpose of this study was to critically explore the possibilities and limitations of applying Simondon's theory of concretization to the development of AI technology and AI generative art. Therefore, this paper shifted to examining how the process of concretization, in which a technological object evolves from an "abstract mode" to a "concrete mode," as Simondon described it, fits with AI technology and AI-generated art. The results and contents of this study are as follows. First, while AI technology has advanced by leveraging computing resources and big data, it differs from Simondon's concept of concretization in that the learning and inference stages are clearly separated and the inference stage operates as a fixed mathematical function. Second, the prompt-based conditioning in AI generative art fundamentally differs from Simondon's concept of associated millieu. Third, collaboration between artists and AI should be reconceptualized as a human-AI collaborative system, rather than the formation of associated millieu. Based on the results of this study, we demonstrate that AI is a new form of technological entity distinct from both physical technological objects and traditional tools. We also hope to critically apply Simondon's theory of concretization to AI generative art.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼