RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    논리적 사고력 수준에 따른 초등학교 6학년 학생의 과학적 개념의 이해 분석

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100011500

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study was to analyse the understanding of the concepts of science based on the 6th graders' levels of logical thinking in elementary schools. To achieve the goal of this study, logical thinking test was given to 108 6th graders of elementary school and 32 students were interviewed. The result of this study was as follows. First, 61.1% of students were in concrete operational period in their logical thinking, 27.8% were in their transitional period, and 11.1% were in their formal operational period. By using Flow-Map, 32 students were analyzed and their levels of logical thinking was significantly associated with their understanding of concept. Students’ flexibility of cognitive structure was significantly associated with logical thinking and the levels of understanding concepts as well. However, misconception didn’t show significant association with levels of logical thinking. Second, the characters of understanding of scientific concept by their levels of logical thinking was that as you get higher levels of logical thinking, their cognitive structure to understand concept was more systemized, in order and more logical. The result of this study suggested the followings in science experiment class. First, 6th graders of elementary schools had various levels of logical thinking and that affected to their understanding of scientific concepts. Therefore, lesson planning and class should be done by reflecting their different levels of logical thinking. Second, since they had different levels of logical thinking, various teaching methods should be utilized to make students understand scientific concepts more systematically.
    번역하기

    This study was to analyse the understanding of the concepts of science based on the 6th graders' levels of logical thinking in elementary schools. To achieve the goal of this study, logical thinking test was given to 108 6th graders of elementary sc...

    This study was to analyse the understanding of the concepts of science based on the 6th graders' levels of logical thinking in elementary schools. To achieve the goal of this study, logical thinking test was given to 108 6th graders of elementary school and 32 students were interviewed. The result of this study was as follows. First, 61.1% of students were in concrete operational period in their logical thinking, 27.8% were in their transitional period, and 11.1% were in their formal operational period. By using Flow-Map, 32 students were analyzed and their levels of logical thinking was significantly associated with their understanding of concept. Students’ flexibility of cognitive structure was significantly associated with logical thinking and the levels of understanding concepts as well. However, misconception didn’t show significant association with levels of logical thinking. Second, the characters of understanding of scientific concept by their levels of logical thinking was that as you get higher levels of logical thinking, their cognitive structure to understand concept was more systemized, in order and more logical. The result of this study suggested the followings in science experiment class. First, 6th graders of elementary schools had various levels of logical thinking and that affected to their understanding of scientific concepts. Therefore, lesson planning and class should be done by reflecting their different levels of logical thinking. Second, since they had different levels of logical thinking, various teaching methods should be utilized to make students understand scientific concepts more systematically.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • ABSTRACT
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 연구 방법 및 절차
    • 1. 연구 대상
    • 2. 자료 수집 및 검사 도구
    • ABSTRACT
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 연구 방법 및 절차
    • 1. 연구 대상
    • 2. 자료 수집 및 검사 도구
    • 3. 자료 분석
    • Ⅲ. 연구 결과 및 논의
    • 1. 초등학교 6학년 학생의 논리적 사고력 수준과과학적 개념 이해 변인의 상관관계
    • 2. 초등학교 6학년 학생의 논리적 사고력 수준에따른 과학적 개념 이해의 특징
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
    • 감사의 글
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 정재구, "초등학교 과학 수업에서 화산 개념의 이해 증진을 위한 개념도 활용" 한국지구과학회 24 (24): 614-624, 2003

    2 오은숙, "중학교 지구과학교과를 중심으로 국가수준 학업성취도 과학 평가 문항 분석" 교육연구원 28 (28): 207-221, 2012

    3 Seong Tae-Je, "Validity and reliability" Hakjisa 148-163, 2005

    4 Fleiss, J. L., "Statistical methods for rates and proportion" Wiley 1981

    5 Kwon Jae-Sool, "Science education" Kyoyookbook 2005

    6 Tsai, C. C., "Probing students' cognitive structures in science: The use of a flow map method coupled with a meta-listening technique" 27 : 257-268, 2001

    7 Kim Chan-Jong, "Introduction of science pedagogy" Bookshill 2002

    8 Kwon Do-Hyun, "Elementary School Students' Conceptions of Buoyance related with Cognitive Levels" 19 (19): 131-143, 2000

    9 Piaget, J., "Cognitive development in children development and learning" 2 (2): 1964

    10 Anderson, O. R., "A flow-map method of representing cognitive structure based on respondents’' narrative using science content" 30 (30): 953-, 1993

    1 정재구, "초등학교 과학 수업에서 화산 개념의 이해 증진을 위한 개념도 활용" 한국지구과학회 24 (24): 614-624, 2003

    2 오은숙, "중학교 지구과학교과를 중심으로 국가수준 학업성취도 과학 평가 문항 분석" 교육연구원 28 (28): 207-221, 2012

    3 Seong Tae-Je, "Validity and reliability" Hakjisa 148-163, 2005

    4 Fleiss, J. L., "Statistical methods for rates and proportion" Wiley 1981

    5 Kwon Jae-Sool, "Science education" Kyoyookbook 2005

    6 Tsai, C. C., "Probing students' cognitive structures in science: The use of a flow map method coupled with a meta-listening technique" 27 : 257-268, 2001

    7 Kim Chan-Jong, "Introduction of science pedagogy" Bookshill 2002

    8 Kwon Do-Hyun, "Elementary School Students' Conceptions of Buoyance related with Cognitive Levels" 19 (19): 131-143, 2000

    9 Piaget, J., "Cognitive development in children development and learning" 2 (2): 1964

    10 Anderson, O. R., "A flow-map method of representing cognitive structure based on respondents’' narrative using science content" 30 (30): 953-, 1993

    11 Kim Kyung-Mee, "A Descriptive Study on Full and Short Version GALT" Korea National University of Education 1999

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2014-01-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2010-02-11 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국지구과학교육학회 -> 대한지구과학교육학회
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.04 1.04 1.11
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.96 0.85 1.567 0.26
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼