RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    대학 영재원 영재선발시험의 단계별 연관성에 관한 연구 : 창의성의 일반 영역적 관점과 특수 영역적 관점에서

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101745802

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aims to analyze a selective examination for the gifted and talented from a domain-general and special standpoint. For this, we analyzed gifted and talented test results carried out by Gifted and Talented Education institute affiliated with the university of Education located in the central region of South Korea. This test consisted of three sections which are giftedness in the first round, academic aptitude in the second round and interview in the last round. I conducted the analysis of variance of the giftedness test result to the gifted and talented group in each subject from the domain-general point of view. As a result, the each group was not significant. This means that the gifted and talented in each subject has giftedness from the domain-general viewpoint. Secondly, I implemented the analysis of correlation among three test such as giftedness, academic aptitude and interview conducted during the selective process for the gifted and talented. The result was that they had a low or no correlations between them and were not significant. This demonstrated that each test checked a different area. That is, we came to realize that the first, second and third test evaluates a different area and in particular, with the result that the first and second test had a low or no correlations between both of them we realized that they evaluated a different area from a domain-special standpoint. The purpose of this study is meaningful to investigate in terms of how the selective test for the gifted and talented is conducted from a domain-general and special standpoint as a recent study viewpoint about the gifted and talented along with creativity. It is too limited to generalize this result because this test was sampled by one region but, this study indicates that we should take a domain-general and special standpoint into account when it comes to selection for the gifted and talented.
    번역하기

    This study aims to analyze a selective examination for the gifted and talented from a domain-general and special standpoint. For this, we analyzed gifted and talented test results carried out by Gifted and Talented Education institute affiliated with ...

    This study aims to analyze a selective examination for the gifted and talented from a domain-general and special standpoint. For this, we analyzed gifted and talented test results carried out by Gifted and Talented Education institute affiliated with the university of Education located in the central region of South Korea. This test consisted of three sections which are giftedness in the first round, academic aptitude in the second round and interview in the last round. I conducted the analysis of variance of the giftedness test result to the gifted and talented group in each subject from the domain-general point of view. As a result, the each group was not significant. This means that the gifted and talented in each subject has giftedness from the domain-general viewpoint. Secondly, I implemented the analysis of correlation among three test such as giftedness, academic aptitude and interview conducted during the selective process for the gifted and talented. The result was that they had a low or no correlations between them and were not significant. This demonstrated that each test checked a different area. That is, we came to realize that the first, second and third test evaluates a different area and in particular, with the result that the first and second test had a low or no correlations between both of them we realized that they evaluated a different area from a domain-special standpoint. The purpose of this study is meaningful to investigate in terms of how the selective test for the gifted and talented is conducted from a domain-general and special standpoint as a recent study viewpoint about the gifted and talented along with creativity. It is too limited to generalize this result because this test was sampled by one region but, this study indicates that we should take a domain-general and special standpoint into account when it comes to selection for the gifted and talented.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • ABSTRACT
    • Ⅰ. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
    • Ⅱ. 연구 방법
    • 1. 연구 대상
    • 2. 검사 도구
    • ABSTRACT
    • Ⅰ. 연구의 필요성 및 목적
    • Ⅱ. 연구 방법
    • 1. 연구 대상
    • 2. 검사 도구
    • 3. 자료 분석
    • 4. 연구의 제한점
    • Ⅲ. 연구 결과
    • 1. 영역 일반적인(domain-general) 관점에서의 집단별 비교
    • 2. 영역 특수적인(domain-specific) 관점에서의 집단별 비교
    • Ⅳ. 논의
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 제언
    • References
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 류성림, "초등수학영재 선발시험 문항의 결과 분석에 관한 사례 연구" 한국수학교육학회 23 (23): 349-381, 2009

    2 박숙희, "영재교육" 박학사 2005

    3 이기영, "과학 영재 선발 도구로서 지필 검사의 적합성 탐색을 위한 질적 및 양적 문항 분석" 한국과학교육학회 28 (28): 32-46, 2008

    4 Diakidoy, I. N, "The issue of domain specificity in creativity testing: A comparison of performance on general divergent-thinking test and a paralled content-specific test" 36 (36): 41-61, 2002

    5 Feldhusen, J. F, "The international encyclopedia of education" Pergamon Press 1178-1183, 1994

    6 Baer, J, "The effect of task-specific divergent-thinking training" 30 (30): 183-187, 1996

    7 Eisenberger, R, "Reward, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: New findings" 53 (53): 673-682, 1998

    8 Lee, J. H, "Potential Gifted Selection Methods(In Terms of the Observation and Nomination System)" The Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity 2010

    9 Siegle, D, "Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs" 48 (48): 21-29, 2004

    10 Baer, J, "Encyclopedia of creativity" Academic Press 591-596, 1999

    1 류성림, "초등수학영재 선발시험 문항의 결과 분석에 관한 사례 연구" 한국수학교육학회 23 (23): 349-381, 2009

    2 박숙희, "영재교육" 박학사 2005

    3 이기영, "과학 영재 선발 도구로서 지필 검사의 적합성 탐색을 위한 질적 및 양적 문항 분석" 한국과학교육학회 28 (28): 32-46, 2008

    4 Diakidoy, I. N, "The issue of domain specificity in creativity testing: A comparison of performance on general divergent-thinking test and a paralled content-specific test" 36 (36): 41-61, 2002

    5 Feldhusen, J. F, "The international encyclopedia of education" Pergamon Press 1178-1183, 1994

    6 Baer, J, "The effect of task-specific divergent-thinking training" 30 (30): 183-187, 1996

    7 Eisenberger, R, "Reward, intrinsic motivation, and creativity: New findings" 53 (53): 673-682, 1998

    8 Lee, J. H, "Potential Gifted Selection Methods(In Terms of the Observation and Nomination System)" The Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity 2010

    9 Siegle, D, "Exploring teacher biases when nominating students for gifted programs" 48 (48): 21-29, 2004

    10 Baer, J, "Encyclopedia of creativity" Academic Press 591-596, 1999

    11 Park, K. H, "Development of the scientific creativity test and analysis of gifted in science students' brain functions" Korea National University of Education 2004

    12 Runco, M. A, "Development and psychometric integrity of a measure of ideational behavior" 13 (13): 393-400, 2001

    13 Jeon, D. R, "Deternination of the Sciece Gifted & Prior Learning. 2006 Report of the University Conjunction Cooperation" 2007-2025, 2007

    14 Jung, H. C, "Changes in gifted education policies and development strategies" The Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science and Creativity 2010

    15 Lee, K. P, "Analyses of the Test Problems for Admission at the Science Education Center for Gifted Youth" 19 (19): 604-621, 1999

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2028 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2022-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2016-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2014-01-08 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education KCI등재후보
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2010-02-11 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국지구과학교육학회 -> 대한지구과학교육학회
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.04 1.04 1.11
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.96 0.85 1.567 0.26
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼