RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      An Analysis of Move Patterns in Abstracts of Social Sciences Research Articles

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104091894

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      A rhetorical segment in traditional abstract displaying a sign of particular function is frequently referred to as a move. One of the most common moves is the Background, Aim, Method, Results, and Conclusion (BAMRC). The objective of this paper is to investigate the move patterns of research article abstracts in the field of social sciences based on BAMRC moves. Using the Scopus bibliographic database, a total of 467 abstracts from 298 research journals in the field of social sciences were analyzed. The result showed a wide range of move patterns. The implication of the result of this study suggests the existing traditional abstracts in social sciences might not be sufficiently “informative” due to missing moves and due to various move orders. To this end, automatically mapping moves in traditional abstracts to sub-headings in structured abstracts can be a more challenging task, requiring additional procedures to resolve these types of compatibility issues. Future studies can compare this study’s result to other fields or disciplines within social sciences in order to find a more precise nature of abstracts in the field of social sciences.
      번역하기

      A rhetorical segment in traditional abstract displaying a sign of particular function is frequently referred to as a move. One of the most common moves is the Background, Aim, Method, Results, and Conclusion (BAMRC). The objective of this paper is to ...

      A rhetorical segment in traditional abstract displaying a sign of particular function is frequently referred to as a move. One of the most common moves is the Background, Aim, Method, Results, and Conclusion (BAMRC). The objective of this paper is to investigate the move patterns of research article abstracts in the field of social sciences based on BAMRC moves. Using the Scopus bibliographic database, a total of 467 abstracts from 298 research journals in the field of social sciences were analyzed. The result showed a wide range of move patterns. The implication of the result of this study suggests the existing traditional abstracts in social sciences might not be sufficiently “informative” due to missing moves and due to various move orders. To this end, automatically mapping moves in traditional abstracts to sub-headings in structured abstracts can be a more challenging task, requiring additional procedures to resolve these types of compatibility issues. Future studies can compare this study’s result to other fields or disciplines within social sciences in order to find a more precise nature of abstracts in the field of social sciences.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Doró, Katalin, "Verb Tenses and Hedging in Published and Unpublished Applied Linguistics Research Paper Abstracts" Studies in Honour of Marianne Nikolov 356-2014,

      2 Hartley, James, "Typographic Settings for Structured Abstracts" 30 : 355-365, 2000

      3 Kellera, Mikaela, "Towards a Systematic Structuring of MEDLINE Abstracts" 2012

      4 Sollaci, Luciana B., "The Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRAD) Structure: A Fifty-Year Survey" 92 (92): 364-367, 2004

      5 Khasseh, Ali Akbar, "Structured vs. Unstructured Abstract: A Different Look at Iranian Journals of Library Science" 4 (4): 1706-1709, 2013

      6 Sharma, Sandeep, "Structured Abstracts: Do They Improve the Quality of Information in Abstracts?" 130 (130): 523-530, 2006

      7 Zhang, Chunfang, "Review of James Hartley’s Research on Structured Abstracts" 37 (37): 570-576, 2011

      8 Budgen, David, "Preliminary Results of a Study of the Completeness and Clarity of Structured Abstracts" 2007

      9 Orasan, Constantin, "Patterns in Scientific Abstracts" 443-405, 2001

      10 Noris, Carol., "On Turning Posters Upside Down" 36 (36): 75-, 2009

      1 Doró, Katalin, "Verb Tenses and Hedging in Published and Unpublished Applied Linguistics Research Paper Abstracts" Studies in Honour of Marianne Nikolov 356-2014,

      2 Hartley, James, "Typographic Settings for Structured Abstracts" 30 : 355-365, 2000

      3 Kellera, Mikaela, "Towards a Systematic Structuring of MEDLINE Abstracts" 2012

      4 Sollaci, Luciana B., "The Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRAD) Structure: A Fifty-Year Survey" 92 (92): 364-367, 2004

      5 Khasseh, Ali Akbar, "Structured vs. Unstructured Abstract: A Different Look at Iranian Journals of Library Science" 4 (4): 1706-1709, 2013

      6 Sharma, Sandeep, "Structured Abstracts: Do They Improve the Quality of Information in Abstracts?" 130 (130): 523-530, 2006

      7 Zhang, Chunfang, "Review of James Hartley’s Research on Structured Abstracts" 37 (37): 570-576, 2011

      8 Budgen, David, "Preliminary Results of a Study of the Completeness and Clarity of Structured Abstracts" 2007

      9 Orasan, Constantin, "Patterns in Scientific Abstracts" 443-405, 2001

      10 Noris, Carol., "On Turning Posters Upside Down" 36 (36): 75-, 2009

      11 Lancaster, F. W., "Indexing and Abstracting in Theory and Practice. 3rd ed" University of Illinois, Graduate School of Library and Information Science 2003

      12 Hartley, James, "Improving the Clarity of Journal Abstracts in Psychology: The Case for Structure" 24 : 366-379, 2003

      13 "ISO Home page"

      14 Swales, John M., "Genre Analysis : English in Academic Research Settings" Cambridge University Press 1990

      15 Song, Wei, "Fuzzy Evolutionary Optimization Modeling and Its Applications to Unsupervised Categorization and Extractive Summarization" 38 (38): 9112-9121, 2011

      16 Hyland, Ken., "Disciplinary Discourses : Social Interactions in Academic Writing" University of Michigan Press 2004

      17 Hartley, James, "Current Findings from Research on Structured Abstracts" 92 : 368-371, 2004

      18 Kafes, Huseyin, "Cultural Traces on the Rhetorical Organization of Research Article Abstracts" 3 (3): 2012

      19 Hartley, James, "Common Weaknesses in Traditional Abstracts in the Social Sciences" 60 (60): 2010-2018, 2009

      20 Goldner, Limor, "Children's Family Drawings, Body Perceptions, and Eating Attitudes: The Moderating Role of Gender" 41 (41): 79-88, 2014

      21 Cleveland, Donald, "B. Introduction to Indexing and Abstracting" Libraries Unlimited 2013

      22 Agarwal, Shashank, "Automatically Classifying Sentences In Full-Text Biomedical Articles into Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion" 25 (25): 3174-3180, 2009

      23 Weinert, Clarann, "Are All Abstracts Created Equal?" Applied Nursing Research 106-109, 2008

      24 Tseng, Fan-ping, "Analyses of Move Structure and Verb Tense of Research Article Abstracts in Applied Linguistics Journals" 1 (1): 2011

      25 Montesi, Michela, "Abstracts: Problems Classified from the User Perspective" 31 (31): 515-526, 2005

      26 Swales, John M., "Abstracts and the Writing of Abstracts" The University Press 2009

      27 Aliguliyev, Ramiz, "A New Sentence Similarity Measure and Sentence Based Extractive Technique for Automatic Text Summarization" 36 (36): 7764-7772, 2009

      28 Ren, Hongwei, "A Comparison Study on the Rhetorical Moves of Abstracts in Published Research Articles and Master's Foreign-Language Theses" 4 (4): 162-166, 2011

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-11-11 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society KCI등재
      2014-10-29 학술지명변경 외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국도서관ㆍ정보학회 -> 한국도서관·정보학회 KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1998-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.74 0.74 0.72
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.69 0.72 0.997 0.18
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼