金履祥『濂洛風雅』在宋儒選本上的定位 = The Position of JIN Lü-Xiang’s Lian Luo Feng Ya on the Anthology of Neo-Confucianists of the Song Dynasty

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

呂祖謙、眞德秀、金履祥皆身為理學家，本乎儒道，文章宗經。但依其編選宗旨及其編選標準不同，其被選的作品作家自異。呂祖謙奉聖旨編選的『宋文鑒』專取有益治道者，收作品以及文體可謂賅備。『古文關鍵』是為文而作，博取古文家之文。眞德秀『文章正宗』具有較農的理學色彩，雖分“辭命”、“議論”、“敘事”、“詩賦”四科，欲明學者識文辭源流之正，但不免為文辭而作之嫌。金履祥『濂洛風雅』依風雅正變，首次專取共同宗祖的“濂洛”學派的文章，欲譜婺學。因此，金履祥以卷首專設“濂洛風雅圖”來彰顯其學統，排列作品順序亦是。故至金履祥『濂洛風雅』始脫于文學性的選本，其意義在於首次匯集濂洛學派之詩文作品來重新樹立學統。

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

LÜ Zu-Qian, ZHEN De-Xiu, and JIN Lü-Xiang are all renowned Neo-Confucianists duringthe Song Dynasty. Their viewpoint on literature was built on Confucianism’s Tao and theyconsidered sentences from Liu Jing canon for their sentence structuring. Yet there aredifferences in compilations they made regarding selection of literatures and writers based ontheir selection criteria.LÜ Zu-Qian’s Song Wen Jian contained various works and writing styles, adhering to theemperor’s order to select sentences that would do good for politics. However, hiscompilation is criticized for lack of coherence. His another compilation Gu Wen Guan Jianmainly consists of sentences of archaic prose writers, holding true to its purpose of guide tosentence structuring. Taken together, overarching characteristics of LÜ’s compilations arepurpose of guide to sentence building.ZHEN De-Xiu viewed sentence as part of academic pursuit, and argued that literatureshould identify sages’ findings and teachings. And it should be practically useful for thecountry, not merely a talk for talking’s sake. Holding true to such belief, ZHEN compiledWen Zhang Zheng Zong by dividing the compilation into four sections: CiMing (purpose),YiLun (exchange of opinion), XuShi (launch work) and ShiFu (verse and prose) in a bid toteach readers for what the right kind of literature works is. This book, albeit strongerphilosophical thought of Neo-Confucianism of the Song Dynasty compared to LÜ’scompilations, is mainly intended as a guide to creation of literature.JIN Lü-Xiang’s Lian Luo Feng Ya, the first compilation of poems written byNeo-Confucianists of the Song Dynasty contains the Lian Luo School’s poems and proses toidentify the school’s origin and scholastic mantles. JIN put his painting Lian Luo Feng Ya Tuon the first page to demonstrate his academic tradition as a successor of Zhu Xi, andarranged literature works in the order of this. It has an implication as the first compilationof the Song's Neo-Confucianists’ poems that abstracted poems created by figures of theLian Luo School and reestablished line of the Lian Luo School, a big move from traditionalframework of compilation for traditional literatures.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 緒言
• 2. 宋儒之詩、文選本
• 3. 金履祥 『濂洛風雅』
• 4. 結語
• 참고문헌
• 논문초록

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 王柏, "魯齋集，清文淵閣四庫全書本"

2 許總, "理學文藝史綱" 江蘇教育出版社 2000

3 程元敏, "王柏之生平與學術" 華東師範大學出版社 2011

4 嚴羽, "滄浪詩話校釋" 人民大學出版社 1961

5 袁桷, "清容居士集，四部叢刊景元本"

6 龔鵬程, "江西詩社宗派研究" 文史哲出版社 1983

7 葉盛, "水東日記，清文淵閣四庫全書本"

8 徐世昌, "晚晴簃詩匯，民國退耕堂刻本"

9 眞德秀, "文章正宗，清文淵閣四庫全書本"

10 樓昉, "崇古文訣，清文淵閣四庫全書本"

11 馮從吾, "少墟集，清文淵閣四庫全書本"

12 呂肖奐, "宋詩體派論" 四川民族出版社 2002

13 梁崑, "宋詩派別論" 商務印書館 1938

14 呂祖謙, "宋文鑑" 中華書局 1992

15 歐陽光, "宋元詩社研究叢稿" 廣東高等教育出版社 2011

16 黃宗羲, "宋元學案" 中華書局 1986

17 孫慧玲, "宋代理學詩派研究" 21 (21): 2006

18 徐袍, "宋仁山金先生年譜，清光緒十三年補刻本"

19 范邦甸, "天一閣書目，清嘉慶文選樓刻本"

20 永瑢, "四庫全書總目，清乾隆武英殿刻本"

21 周敦頤, "周元公集，宋刻本"

22 金履祥, "叢書集成初編·濂洛風雅" 商務印書館 1939

23 呂祖謙, "叢書集成初編·古文關鍵" 商務印書館 1936

24 金履祥, "叢書集成初編·仁山集" 商務印書館 1935

25 黄佐, "南廱志，民國景明嘉靖二十三年刻增修本"

26 金履祥, "仁山集，清文淵閣四庫全書本"

27 朱熹, "二程遺書，清文淵閣四庫全書本"

28 龔鵬程, "中國文學史(下冊)" 世界圖書出版公司北京公司 2011

29 龔鵬程, "中國文學史(上冊)" 世界圖書出版公司北京公司 2009