조달입찰(Procurement Auction)의 성과개선을 위한 프로세스 및 경쟁 최적화 모델 설계 = A Study on Designing the process and competitive optimization models of Procurement Auction

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose This study is about to establish standards for process design and operation of procurement auction, which is one of the ways to effectively determine the price with the vendor in the procurement.
Methods The method of research was selected as a case company in which various forms of procurement are carried out. In the process design of procurement auction, We derived from RCA method how to improve the constraints for evaluating multiple attributes. In order to establish the operating standards for procurement auction, 720 cases of approximately 3.5 years were tested through statistical analysis and based on this, the operating standards for procurement auctions were proposed.
Results This study shows, The design of the procurement auction using Fishbone Diagram was able to expand the bid by mitigating the avoidance factor of multi-attribute evaluation, and the results of completion inspection can be analyzed to confirm its. Procurement auction is an advantageous method of price determination compared to negotiated pricing in cases where the order amount is large and it is difficult for the person in charge to calculate the expected price. An analysis of the winning price of new companies showed that new companies are challengingly offering prices and that such competitiveness continues for two to three years. In addition, it was analyzed that the bid reaches a stable and reliable bid price when there are more than four bidders participants.
Conclusion The results illustrate, this study proposed a multi-attribute assessment process design method for procurement auction and defined criteria that could be effective in bidding operation, such as number of participants, sourcing new companies, and improving expected price estimation capability.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이형순, "전략적 구매관리를 위한 PSM(Purchasing & Supply Management) 프로세스 설계 및 SRM 실행 효과 분석 - SRM시스템 구축 사례 및 성과 중심 -" 한국경영공학회 25 (25): 61-84, 2020

2 기획재정부, "국가를 대상자료 하는 계약에 관한 법률, 국가계약관련 행정규칙"

3 정광용, "公共工事 入札制度 變化가 建設産業에 미치는 影向 : 最低價 入札을 中心으로" 고려대학교 정책대학원 2012

4 Rothkopf, M. H., "Why Are Vickrey Auction Rare?" 98 (98): 94-109, 1990

5 Bakos, Yannis, "The Emerging Role of Electronic Marketplaces on the Internet" 41 (41): 35-42, 1998

6 Elmaghraby, WJ, "Supply contract competition and sourcing policies" 2 (2): 2000

7 French, Kenneth R., "Sealed bids Sunk costs and the Process of competition" 57 : 417-442, 1984

8 Maxwell, Sarah,, "Rule-based price fairness and its effect on willingness to purchase" 23 : 191-212, 2002

9 이동명, "Purchasing Strategies based on Business Strategy and Types of Product" 한국경영공학회 22 (22): 25-40, 2017

10 Kraljic, Peter., "Purchasing Must Become Supply Management" Harvard College 1983

11 Lichtenstein, Donald R., "Price Perceptions and Consumer Shopping Behavior" 30 : 234-245, 1993

12 Napier, Thomas R., "One-Step and Two-Step Facility Acquisition for Military Construction: Project Selection and Implementation Procedures" USACERL 1990

13 Kersten, Gregory E., "Negotiation and Auction Mechanisms: Two Systems and Two Experiments" InterNeg 2011

14 Cengiza, A. E., "Multi-Criteria Decision Model for Construction Meterial Supplier Selection" 196 : 294-301, 2017

15 Parkes, David C., "Models for iterative multiattribute procurement auctions" 51 (51): 435-451, 1909

16 Pinker, E. J., "Managing online auctions: Current business and research issues" 49 (49): 1457-1484, 2003

17 Lo, Wei, "Evaluating Qualification-Based Selection System: A Simulation Approach" 135 (135): 2009

18 Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., "E-sourcing in Procurement: Theory and Behavior in Reverse Auctions with Noncompetitive Contracts" 52 (52): 581-568, 2006

19 Kannan, P. K., "Dynamaic pricing in the online Chanel" 5 (5): 63-83, 2001

20 Maynes, E. S., "Decision-making for consumers: an introduction to consumer economics" Macmillan 1976

21 Zeithaml, V., "Consumer Response to In-Store Price Information Environments" 8 : 337-369, 1988

22 Hohner, Gail., "Combinatorial and quantity-discount procurement auctions benefit Mars, Incorporated and its suppliers" 33 (33): 23-35, 2003

23 MARIA M.WIHARDJA, "CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT AUCTIONS: POSITIVE EQUILIBRIUM ANALYSIS, INCENTIVE MECHANISM DESIGN, AND EMPIRICAL STUDY" 경제연구소 35 (35): 35-57, 2010

24 Bulow, J. I., "Auctions vs. Negotiations" National Bureau of Economic Research 1994

25 Beam, Carrie, "Auctions on the Internet : a Field Study" Haas School of Business, University of California at Berkeley 1998

26 Milgrom, P., "Auctions and Bidding : A Primer" 3 (3): 3-22, 1989

27 Cassady, R. Jr., "Auctions and Auctioneering" University of California Berkely 1967

28 Engelbrecht-Wiggans, Richard, "Auctions Bidding And Contracting: Uses and Theory" York university press 1983

29 Bean, Caroline McHolme, "Auctioning and Bidding in Electronic Commerce The online Auction" Princeton University 1991

30 Chandrashekar, T. S., "Auction-Based Mechanisms for Electronic Procurement" 4 (4): 2007

31 McAfee, R Preston, "Auction And Bidding" University of Western Ontario Canada 1986

32 ILIE, Gheorghe, "Application of Fishbone Diagram to Determine the Risk of an Event with Multiple causes" 2 (2): 1-20, 2010

33 Paarsch, HJ., "An Introduction to the Structural Econometrics of Auction Data, 1(1)" MIT Press 2006

34 Bailey, Joseph P., "An Exploratory Study of the Emerging Role of Electronic Intermediaries" 1 (1): 7-20, 1997

35 Bichler, Martin, "An Experimental Analysis of Multi-attribute Auctions" 29 (29): 249-268, 2000

36 Milgrom, P., "A Theory of Auctions and Competitive Bidding II in The Economic Theory of Auctions" Edward Elgar Publishing UK 2000

37 Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., "A Comparison of Buyer-determined and Price-based Multiattribute Mechanisms" 26 (26): 629-641, 2007