RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      1970년대 원주그룹의 부락개발운동 연구 : 새마을운동과의 비교를 중심으로 = A Comparative Study on the Wonju Group`s Village Development Movement and the Saemaeul Movement in the 1970s

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In the 1970s, the Wonju Group conducted a Village Development Movement in 80 to 90 agricultural villages in three provinces by helping those communities establish and operate farming groups, village councils, credit unions, and consumers` unions as part of the Namhan River Project. The Institute of Agricultural Issues played an important role in the movement by providing a theoretical framework for the project. The Korean Agricultural Research Association and the Institute of Agricultural Issues had its theoretical basis in the theory of cooperative agriculture and the experience of conducting village development projects in the 1950s and 1960s and joining cooperative farms in the 1960 and 1970s. These experiences and the theoretical basis enabled the Wonju Group to propel the village development project through the cooperative movement and to produce a good example of an advanced theory of cooperative agriculture. The government-led Saemaeul Movement and the Village Development Movement in the 1970s were considerably similar to each other. They both helped rural villages increase earnings through cooperative activities, to train community leaders, and to raise community funds. However, two factors helped differentiate the Village Development Movement from the Saemaeul Movement. The first was the fact that the Wonju Group provided ed ucation programs for local farmers to enable them to lead the Village Development Movement. Second, the credit unions in those villages actively tried to form a farmers` organization and establish the Catholic Farmer`s Society to help farmers to achieve cooperation and democratization in their communities . The farmers who played an important role in the Saemaeul Movement were actually collaborators of the government and they sabotaged the Wonju Group`s general activities and suppressed the farmers` movement in the rural areas. The Village Development Movement of the Wonju Group and the community leaders of the 80 to 90 agricultural villages in the three provinces is a good example of a civil-led development project for agricultural communities. It has historical significance because it could suggest a completely different model of an agricultural development project, which would be distinctive from the government-led Saemaeul Movement. This study aimed to deepen the understanding of village development programs in the 1970s.
      번역하기

      In the 1970s, the Wonju Group conducted a Village Development Movement in 80 to 90 agricultural villages in three provinces by helping those communities establish and operate farming groups, village councils, credit unions, and consumers` unions as pa...

      In the 1970s, the Wonju Group conducted a Village Development Movement in 80 to 90 agricultural villages in three provinces by helping those communities establish and operate farming groups, village councils, credit unions, and consumers` unions as part of the Namhan River Project. The Institute of Agricultural Issues played an important role in the movement by providing a theoretical framework for the project. The Korean Agricultural Research Association and the Institute of Agricultural Issues had its theoretical basis in the theory of cooperative agriculture and the experience of conducting village development projects in the 1950s and 1960s and joining cooperative farms in the 1960 and 1970s. These experiences and the theoretical basis enabled the Wonju Group to propel the village development project through the cooperative movement and to produce a good example of an advanced theory of cooperative agriculture. The government-led Saemaeul Movement and the Village Development Movement in the 1970s were considerably similar to each other. They both helped rural villages increase earnings through cooperative activities, to train community leaders, and to raise community funds. However, two factors helped differentiate the Village Development Movement from the Saemaeul Movement. The first was the fact that the Wonju Group provided ed ucation programs for local farmers to enable them to lead the Village Development Movement. Second, the credit unions in those villages actively tried to form a farmers` organization and establish the Catholic Farmer`s Society to help farmers to achieve cooperation and democratization in their communities . The farmers who played an important role in the Saemaeul Movement were actually collaborators of the government and they sabotaged the Wonju Group`s general activities and suppressed the farmers` movement in the rural areas. The Village Development Movement of the Wonju Group and the community leaders of the 80 to 90 agricultural villages in the three provinces is a good example of a civil-led development project for agricultural communities. It has historical significance because it could suggest a completely different model of an agricultural development project, which would be distinctive from the government-led Saemaeul Movement. This study aimed to deepen the understanding of village development programs in the 1970s.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 이만갑, "한국농촌사회 연구" 다락원 1981

      2 유인호, "한국농업협업화에 관한 연구-농업협업화의 이론형성을 위한 서설" 한국연구원 1967

      3 김병태, "한국농업경제론" 한국농어민 1992

      4 한국가톨릭농민회, "한국가톨릭농민회30년사"

      5 이상호, "참된 용기는 희망을 낳고(신협운동40년 회고록)" 덕산기획 2003

      6 김일주, "진실과 용기" 비조 1982

      7 림영철, "일가 김용기와 가나안이상촌운동" 재단법인 일가재단 2009

      8 김준, "은혜로 마음밭을 갈며" 흥사단출판부 1980

      9 김병태, "운중 김병태 저작집 II" 백산서당 1992

      10 김용기, "운명의 개척자가 되자" 배영사 1975

      1 이만갑, "한국농촌사회 연구" 다락원 1981

      2 유인호, "한국농업협업화에 관한 연구-농업협업화의 이론형성을 위한 서설" 한국연구원 1967

      3 김병태, "한국농업경제론" 한국농어민 1992

      4 한국가톨릭농민회, "한국가톨릭농민회30년사"

      5 이상호, "참된 용기는 희망을 낳고(신협운동40년 회고록)" 덕산기획 2003

      6 김일주, "진실과 용기" 비조 1982

      7 림영철, "일가 김용기와 가나안이상촌운동" 재단법인 일가재단 2009

      8 김준, "은혜로 마음밭을 갈며" 흥사단출판부 1980

      9 김병태, "운중 김병태 저작집 II" 백산서당 1992

      10 김용기, "운명의 개척자가 되자" 배영사 1975

      11 신협중앙회, "신협운동30년사"

      12 신협중앙회, "신협운동20년사"

      13 내무부, "새마을운동-시작에서 오늘까지"

      14 주석균, "남정 주석균논총 上․下" 열음사 1991

      15 김영미, "그들의 새마을운동" 푸른역사 2009

      16 공제욱, "국가와 일상-박정희시대" 한울 2008

      17 한국가톨릭농민회 원주교구연합회, "가톨릭농민회 원주교구연합회30년사"

      18 가나안신용협동조합, "가나안신협의 발자취 35년(1971∼2005)"

      19 김소남, "1970년대 원주지역의 부락개발사업 연구‒재해대책사업위원회의 초기 활동을 중심으로‒" 한국역사연구회 (82) : 407-454, 2011

      20 한국정신문화연구원, "1960년대 사회변화 연구-1963∼1970" 백산서당 1999

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.12 1.12 1.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.04 1.06 1.812 0.43
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼