RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      생산레짐과 일가정양립정책이 성별 임금격차에 미치는 영향연구 = Production Regimes, Family Policy and Gender Wage Gap

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104224570

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Female plays an important role in new welfare policies as emerging new social risks including care needs resulted from increasing female employment participation and changes in family structures. Whereas the effects of work and life reconciliation policies on female employment are well established, less is known for the role of production regime as an important institution on gender wage gap. This study examines the questions in what way and to what extent production regimes and work and family reconciliation policies influence gender wage gap in advanced capitalism countries using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS). The coordinated market economies (CMEs), presented as higher firm-specific skills, are associated with lower income rank for female workers than male workers, hence larger degree of gender wage gap. Longer parental leave weeks and higher childcare expenditures are associated with less degree of gender wage gap. This research highlights the importance of production regimes in understanding gender wage gap and potential interaction between production regimes and work and life reconciliation policies on gender wage gap.
      번역하기

      Female plays an important role in new welfare policies as emerging new social risks including care needs resulted from increasing female employment participation and changes in family structures. Whereas the effects of work and life reconciliation pol...

      Female plays an important role in new welfare policies as emerging new social risks including care needs resulted from increasing female employment participation and changes in family structures. Whereas the effects of work and life reconciliation policies on female employment are well established, less is known for the role of production regime as an important institution on gender wage gap. This study examines the questions in what way and to what extent production regimes and work and family reconciliation policies influence gender wage gap in advanced capitalism countries using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS). The coordinated market economies (CMEs), presented as higher firm-specific skills, are associated with lower income rank for female workers than male workers, hence larger degree of gender wage gap. Longer parental leave weeks and higher childcare expenditures are associated with less degree of gender wage gap. This research highlights the importance of production regimes in understanding gender wage gap and potential interaction between production regimes and work and life reconciliation policies on gender wage gap.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 신광영, "한국의 성별 임금격차: 차이와 차별" 한국사회학회 45 (45): 97-127, 2011

      2 유정미, "청년세대 노동시장 진입 단계의 성별임금격차 분석" 한국여성학회 33 (33): 107-155, 2017

      3 류연규, "일-가족양립정책이 여성의 일-가족 양립에 미치는 영향에 대한 비교 연구: 여성 근로소득에 대한 정책의 직․간접 효과를 중심으로" 한국보건사회연구원 33 (33): 122-161, 2013

      4 김영미, "분리와 차별의 장기 지속" 490-502, 2016

      5 김정현, "복지국가 유형별 저소득 여성 한부모가족에 대한 노동권과 모성권 지원정책 비교연구" 한국가족사회복지학회 (41) : 115-142, 2013

      6 정성미, "남녀 임금격차 국제비교" 96-97, 2015

      7 Orloff, A. S., "Women’s employment and welfare regimes (Social Policy and Development Programme Paper 12)" United Nations Research Institute for Social Development 2002

      8 Rueda, D., "Wage inequality and varieties of capitalism" 52 (52): 350-383, 2000

      9 Thelen, K., "Varieties of capitalism: Trajectories of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity" 15 : 137-159, 2012

      10 Estevez-Abe, M., "Varieties of Capitalism" Oxford University Press 145-183, 2001

      1 신광영, "한국의 성별 임금격차: 차이와 차별" 한국사회학회 45 (45): 97-127, 2011

      2 유정미, "청년세대 노동시장 진입 단계의 성별임금격차 분석" 한국여성학회 33 (33): 107-155, 2017

      3 류연규, "일-가족양립정책이 여성의 일-가족 양립에 미치는 영향에 대한 비교 연구: 여성 근로소득에 대한 정책의 직․간접 효과를 중심으로" 한국보건사회연구원 33 (33): 122-161, 2013

      4 김영미, "분리와 차별의 장기 지속" 490-502, 2016

      5 김정현, "복지국가 유형별 저소득 여성 한부모가족에 대한 노동권과 모성권 지원정책 비교연구" 한국가족사회복지학회 (41) : 115-142, 2013

      6 정성미, "남녀 임금격차 국제비교" 96-97, 2015

      7 Orloff, A. S., "Women’s employment and welfare regimes (Social Policy and Development Programme Paper 12)" United Nations Research Institute for Social Development 2002

      8 Rueda, D., "Wage inequality and varieties of capitalism" 52 (52): 350-383, 2000

      9 Thelen, K., "Varieties of capitalism: Trajectories of liberalization and the new politics of social solidarity" 15 : 137-159, 2012

      10 Estevez-Abe, M., "Varieties of Capitalism" Oxford University Press 145-183, 2001

      11 Hall, P., "Varieties of Capitalism" Oxford University Press 1-68, 2001

      12 Baker, M., "Universal child care, maternal labor supply, and family well-being" 116 (116): 709-745, 2008

      13 Ferragina, E., "Unemployment protection and family policy at the turn of the 21st century : a dynamic approach to welfare regime theory" 47 (47): 783-805, 2013

      14 Blau, F. D., "Understanding international differences in the gender pay gap" 21 (21): 106-144, 2003

      15 Esping-Andersen, G., "The three worlds of welfare capitalism" Princeton University Press 1990

      16 Pettit, B., "The structure of women’s employment in comparative perspective" 84 (84): 779-801, 2005

      17 Bonoli, G., "The politics of the new social policies : providing coverage against new social risks in mature welfare states" 33 (33): 431-449, 2005

      18 Iversen, T., "The political economy of gender: Explaining cross-national variation in the gender division of labor and the gender voting gap" 50 (50): 1-19, 2006

      19 Budig, M. J., "The motherhood penalty in cross-national perspective : The importance of work-family policies and cultural attitudes" 19 (19): 163-193, 2012

      20 Esping-Andersen, G., "The incomplete revolution: Adapting to women’s new roles" The Polity Press 2009

      21 Haeusermann, S., "Review article : rethinking party politics and the welfare state ‒recent advances in the literature" 43 (43): 221-240, 2013

      22 Korpi, W., "Power resources and employer-centered approaches in explanation of welfare states and varieties of capitalism-Protagonists, consenters, antagonist" 58 (58): 167-206, 2006

      23 Iversen, T., "Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation" 41 (41): 600-637, 2008

      24 Huber, E., "Partisan governance, women’s employment, and the social democratic service state" 65 (65): 323-342, 2000

      25 Kluve, J., "Parental leave regulations, mothers’ labor force attachment and fathers’ childcare involvement : evidence from a natural experiment" 26 (26): 983-1005, 2013

      26 Schober, P. . S., "Parental leave and domestic work of mothers and fathers : a longitudinal study of two reforms in West Germany" 43 (43): 351-372, 2014

      27 Taylor-Gooby, P., "New risks and social change" Oxford University Press 2004

      28 Jaumottes, F., "Labour force participation of women: Empirical evidence on the role of policy and other determinants in OECD countries" OECD 2003

      29 Albrecht, J., "Is there a glass ceiling in Sweden?" 21 (21): 145-177, 2003

      30 Schroeder, M., "Integrating welfare and production typologies: how refinements of the Varieties of Capitalism approach call for a combination of welfare typologies" 38 (38): 19-43, 2009

      31 Rubery, J., "How gendering the varieties of capitalism requires a wider lens" 16 (16): 192-203, 2009

      32 Raduenbush, A., "Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods" Sage Publications 2002

      33 OECD, "Governmen at a glance"

      34 Orloff, A. S., "Gendering the comparative analysis of welfare states : An unfinished agenda" 27 (27): 317-343, 2009

      35 Estevez-Abe, M., "Gender bias in skills and social policies : The varieties of capitalism perspective on sex segregation" 12 (12): 180-215, 2005

      36 Klerman, J., "Gender and Family Issues in the Workplace" Russell Sage Foundation 65-91, 1997

      37 Mandel, H., "Family policies, wage structures, and gender gaps : Sources of Earnings inequality in 20 countries" 70 (70): 949-967, 2005

      38 Tomlinson, J., "Employment regulation, welfare and gender regimes: a comparative analysis of women’s working-time patterns and work-life balance in the U.K. and the U.S" 18 (18): 401-415, 2007

      39 Huber, E., "Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties an policies in global markets" University of Chicago press 2001

      40 Boeckmann, I., "Cultural and institutional factors shaping mother employment and working hours in postindustrial countries" 93 (93): 1301-1333, 2015

      41 Gornick, J. C., "Creating gender egalitarian societies : An agenda for reform" 36 (36): 313-349, 2008

      42 Mandel, H., "Configurations of gender equality : The consequences of ideology and public policy" 60 (60): 693-719, 2009

      43 Brady, D., "Comparative welfare states data set"

      44 Gauthier, A. H., "Comparative family policy database, Version 3 [computer file]. Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute and Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research (distributors)"

      45 Datta Gupta, N., "Child care and parental leave in the Nordic countries: a model to aspire to?" Institute for the Study of Labor 2006

      46 Mandel, H., "A welfare state paradox : State interventions and women’s employment opportunities in 22 countries" 111 : 1910-1949, 2006

      47 Becker, G. S., "A theory of the allocation of time" 75 : 493-517, 1965

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.63 1.63 1.68
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.77 1.86 2.075 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼