부동산명의신탁의 형사책임에 대한 비판적 고찰 = Critic Investigation on the Criminal Responsibility for Premise Title Trust

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

  1. CONTENTS<BR>  (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES<BR>  The system of premise title trust has been denounced as it was frequently misused to conceal premise speculation or to commit diverse illegal misconduct. However, as premise real name system was enforced in 1995, such act became subject to punishment and the alteration of real right for premise by premise title trust and the registry thereof was invalidated. Thus, it is essential to establish legal relation different from that of the past in connection with premise title trust. Thus, this dissertation intends to concretely investigate positive type of title trust defined in the premise real name law and criminal responsibility of title trustee that voluntarily disposes premise with title trust in each case.<BR>  (2) RESEARCH METHOD<BR>  Referring to recent judgment and diverse dissertations related to premise trust system. I examined the concrete type and case of premise title trust.<BR>  (3) RESEARCH RESULTS<BR>  In premise title trust, the trustee that voluntarily disposes commits embezzlement irrespective of 2nd or 3rd party. If seller is mala fide contract title trust, malpractice is established. If seller is bona fide contract title trust, however, both embezzlement and malpractice are not established.<BR>  2. RESULTS<BR>  In the case of registry title trust such as 2-party registry title trust and 3-party registry title trust, the voluntary disposition of trustee also establishes embezzlement as before, because title trust itself, though invalidated by premise real name, still exists as actual material corroborating that the real ownership of premise belongs to title truster. In case that seller is bona fide in the 3-party contract title trust, the voluntary disposition of trustee does not establish embezzlement, because the ownership of trustee is recognized as per the intent of premise real name law. In case that seller is mala fide in the 3-party contract title trust, ownership is reverted to premise real name law, but embezzlement of title truster as the party that manages the business of truster is established, because the actual trust relation between title trustee and title truster is recognized.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• ABSTRACT
  Ⅰ. 서론
  Ⅱ. 부동산실명법과 부동산명의 신탁의 법적 성격
  Ⅲ. 부동산실명법상 명의신탁 유형에 따른 형사책임
  Ⅳ. 기타의 문제
  Ⅴ. 결론
  參考文獻
  

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "형법각론 (증보판)" 법지사 2000

2 "형법각론 (제6판)" 박영사 2005

3 "형법각론 (제6전정판)" 홍문사 2006

4 "형법각론 (제5판)" 박영사 2003

5 "형법각론 (개정판)" 법원사 2005

6 "협법각론 (제5판)" 박영사 2003

7 "수탁자의 수탁부동산 처분행위와 횡령죄" 제주판례연구회 1 : 1997

8 "불법원인급여와 횡령죄" 박영사 8 : 2000

9 "부동산실명법의 사법적 규정에 의한 명의신탁의 규율 : 소위 계약명의신탁을 중심으로" 성곡학술문화재단 28 (28): 1997

10 "부동산실명법에 위반한 명의신탁과 횡령죄" 광주지방법원 1998

11 "부동산실명법 제4조에 의한 명의신탁의 효력 : 소위 등기명의신탁을 중심으로" 서울대법학연구소 38 (38): 1997.

12 "부동산실명법 규정의 제모순점" 고시계 1997.2

13 "부동산명의신탁과 횡령죄의 성부" 고시계 2005.5

14 "부동산명의신탁과 횡령죄" 박영사 7 : 1999

15 "부동산명의신탁과 횡령죄" 박영사 6 : 1998

16 "명의신탁의 법리" 고시연구사 1996

17 "명의신탁에 과한 판례이론의 연구 서울대학교 법학연구소" 통 (통): 1974

18 "명의신탁부동산의 처분과 형사책임" 한국비교형사법학회 2 (2): 2000

19 "명의신탁등기" 고시계 1997.2

20 "명의신탁 부동산의 처분행위에 대한 횡령죄의 성립여부 : 특히 부동산실권리자명의등기에 관한 법률과 관련하여-" 고시연구사 12 : 1997

21 "명의신탁 부동산을 임의처분한 경우의 형사책임" (15) : 2001