우리나라 후기구석기시대 슴베석기의 기능과 도구복원 연구 = A Study on the Function and Restoration of Tanged Tool in the Upper Paleolithic of Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A tanged tool was a representative one to the upper paleolithic period in Northeast Asia, especially in Korea. The tool had been generally using during blade tool culture and micro-blade tool culture. The stemmed part is closely related with a built-in behavior to utilize a medium for the completion of the tool. This stone tool could largely be divided into a hunting implement and a living implement by whether it has the symmetry related to the function of tool or not. According to the result of ethnographic data and experimental archeology researches, a tanged tool could be transformed variously by the rejuvenation process when its blade was damaged during a hunting. Judging from the symmetry and the transforming process, Korean tanged tool could be revitalized to a hunting tool to be connected with the shaft of an arrow and a living tool to install the damaged tool in a handle part. In case of the revitalization to a hunting tool, it could have more possibility to be used to an arrowhead, an atlatl utilized by atlatl thrower, or a short-distance atlatl than to be just used to a spear.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이헌종, "호남지역 후기구석기시대 석기문화의 주요 특징에 대한 고찰" 호남고고학회 16 : 5-24, 2002

2 이정철, "일본 후기 구석기시대 슴베찌르개(剝片尖頭器) 연구에 대한 검토" 충북사학학회 20 : 2008

3 장용준, "우리나라 찌르개(尖頭器)연구" 한국구석기학회 6 : 2002

4 이기길, "슴베찌르개와 공반유물에 대하여, In 영남지방의 구석기문화" 영남고고학회 1999

5 이융조, "수양개유적의 슴베연모에 대한 새로운 연구" 한국구석기학회 6 : 2002

6 이융조, "수양개 슴베연모의 고찰" 충북대학교박물관·단양향토문화연구회. 1999

7 박영철, "밀양 고례리 및 진주 집현유적의 슴베형 석기에 관하여" 한양대학교 문화재연구소, 한국선사고고학회. 2006

8 이헌종, "동북아시아 현생인류의 등장과 사냥도구의 지역 적응에 대한 연구" 한국구석기학회 1 (1): 23-42, 2009

9 중앙문화재연구원, "대전 용산동 구석기유적"

10 장용준, "韓半島와 日本 九州地域의 後期 舊石器文化의 交流 : 슴베찌르개(剝片尖頭器)를 中心으로" 영남고고학회 2004

11 강창화, "濟州高山里遺蹟" 北濟州郡· 濟州大學校博物館 1998

12 木村英明, "シ ベリアの旧石器文化" 北海道大學図書刊行會 1997

13 Couch. J.S., "The effect of projectile point size on atlatl dart efficiency" 24 (24): 27-37, 1999

14 Perkins, W.R., "The Weighted Atlatl and Dart: a Deceptively Complicated Mechanical System" 33 (33): 65-77, 1992

15 Brandt S.A., "The Ethnoarchaeology of Hide Working and Flaked Stone Tool Use in Southern Ethiopia" Shokado Book Sellers 351-361, 1997

16 Howard, C.D., "The Atlatl:Function and Performance" 39 : 102-104, 1974

17 Butler, B.R., "The Atatl: the Physics of Function and Performance" 20 : 105-110, 1975

18 Gould R.A, "Spears and Spear Throwers of the Western Desert Aborigines of Australia, no.2403" American Museum of Natural History 1970

19 Moss, E., "Reconstruction of Tool Use at Pincevent : Microwear and Experiments, Studia Praehistorica Belgica 2" Tervuren 289-312, 1982

20 Towner. R.H., "Projectile Point Rejuvenation : A Technological Analysis" 17 : 311-321, 1990

21 Woods, J.C., "Projectile Point Fracture Patterns and Inferences About Tool Function" 11 (11): 3-7, 1988

22 Casper J.P, "Preparing the hunt in a Late Palaeolithic base camp, A technofunctional and spatial analysis of backed pieces at Rekem(Belgium)" 23 (23): 437-460, 1996

23 D errico F., "Possible evidence of bone tool shaping by Swartkrans early hominids" 30 : 1559-1576, 2003

24 Boeda, E., "Middle Palaeolithic bitumen use at Umm el Tlel around 70,000 BP" 82 (82): 853-861, 2008

25 Benecke N, "Mensch-Tier-Beziehungen im Jung und Spatpalaolithikum, In Man and Environment in the Paleolithic" 62 : 77-87, 1995

26 Fischer, A., "Macro and Micro Wear Traces on Lithic Projectile Points" 3 : 19-46, 1984

27 Billamboz A., "L industrie du bois de cerf enFranche-Comte au Neolithique et au debut de l age du Bronze" 20 (20): 91-176, 1977

28 Mania D., "Konigsaue: Gliederung, Okologie und mittelpalaolithische Funde der letzten Eiszeit" Deutscher Verlag derWissenschaften 1973

29 Witthoft J., "Indian Methods of Skin Dressing and Tanning" 8 (8): 94-99, 1958

30 Rots, V., "Hafting traces on flint tools, Prehistoric technology:40 years later" Archeopress 2008

31 Keeley L. H., "Hafting and Retooling:effects on the archaeological record" 47 : 798-809, 1982

32 Rots, V., "Hafting Traces on Flint Tools: Possibilities and Limitations of Macro and Microscopic Approaches" Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, 2002

33 Witthoft, J., "Flint Arrowpoints From the Eskimo of Northwestern Alaska" 10 (10): 30-37, 1968

34 Odell G.H., "Experiments with Spears and Arrows on Animal Targets" 13 (13): 195-212, 1986

35 Raymond, A, "Experiments in the function and Performance of the Weighted Atlatl" 18 : 153-177, 1986

36 Nissen, K., "Ethnographic data and wear pattern analysis : a study of socketed eskimo scrapers" Idaho State University Museum 17 (17): 67-88, 1974

37 Bar-Yosef O., "Direct and Indirect evidence for hafting in the Epi-Palaeolithic and Neolithic of the Southern Levant, In La main et l outil: manches et emmanchements prehistoriques." 1987

38 Lauwers R., "Decouverte d un vaste campement du Paleolithique final dans la vallee de la Meuse, Belgique" 89 : 557-559, 1985

39 Boeda E., "Bitumen as hafting material on Middle Palaolithic artifacts from the El Kown Basin, Syria, In Neandertals and Modern Humans in Western Asia" Plenum Press 181-204, 1998

40 Connan J., "Archaeological bitumen: Identification, origins, and uses of an ancient Near Eastern material, In Material Issues in Art and Archaeology III" Materials Research Society 683-720, 1992

41 Titmus, G.L., "An Experimental Study of Projectile Point Fracture Patterns" 8 : 37-49, 1986

42 Richard A.B., "ATLATL DYNAMICS" 21 (21): 31-41, 1998

43 Mazza P.P.A., "A new Palaeolithic discovery: tar-hafted stone tools in a European Mid-Pleistocene bone-bearing bed" 33 (33): 1310-1318, 2006