RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Linguistic Relativity: Evidence from Native Korean and English Speakers and Factors Affecting Its Extent

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103646054

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study explores how linguistic relativity of a language affects the cognition of its speakers. The findings show compelling evidence supporting linguistic relativity. The way that native Koreans perceive objects was found to be different from that of native English speakers. The factors affecting the extent of linguistic relativity are the test type and the language exposure in the target culture. The linguistic test seems to trigger the path between the language and the cognition more directly than the non-linguistic test where the cognitive activity may bypass any linguistic encoding. The effect of English proficiency did not reach the statistical significance; however, the cultural exposure revealed a positive effect on linguistic relativity.
      번역하기

      This study explores how linguistic relativity of a language affects the cognition of its speakers. The findings show compelling evidence supporting linguistic relativity. The way that native Koreans perceive objects was found to be different from that...

      This study explores how linguistic relativity of a language affects the cognition of its speakers. The findings show compelling evidence supporting linguistic relativity. The way that native Koreans perceive objects was found to be different from that of native English speakers. The factors affecting the extent of linguistic relativity are the test type and the language exposure in the target culture. The linguistic test seems to trigger the path between the language and the cognition more directly than the non-linguistic test where the cognitive activity may bypass any linguistic encoding. The effect of English proficiency did not reach the statistical significance; however, the cultural exposure revealed a positive effect on linguistic relativity.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 박태숙, "영어에의 자연노출이 한국인 학습자의 화용적 인식과 문법적 인식에 미치는 영향" 한국현대언어학회 31 (31): 663-682, 2015

      2 Casasanto, D., "Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic Differences in Temporal Language and Thought" 58 (58): 63-79, 2008

      3 Casasanto, D., "Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic Differences in Temporal Language and Thought" 58 (58): 63-79, 2008

      4 최문홍, "Visual Scene Description and Recall: On Differences between Korean and English Speakers" 언어교육원 51 (51): 197-223, 2015

      5 McDonough, L., "Understanding Spatial Relations : Flexible Infants, Lexical Adults" 46 : 229-259, 2003

      6 Robersona, D., "Thresholds for Color Discrimination in English and Korean Speakers" 112 : 482-487, 2009

      7 Pinker, S., "The Language Instinct" Harper Perennial Modern Classics 1994

      8 김남순, "Study Abroad Experiences for Korean EFL Student Teachers in a Large Philippine University" 한국현대언어학회 31 (31): 215-246, 2015

      9 Munnich, E., "Spatial Language and Spatial Representation : A Crosslinguistic Comparison" 81 : 171-207, 2001

      10 Bowerman, M., "Rethinking Linguistic Relativity" Cambridge University Press 145-176, 1996

      1 박태숙, "영어에의 자연노출이 한국인 학습자의 화용적 인식과 문법적 인식에 미치는 영향" 한국현대언어학회 31 (31): 663-682, 2015

      2 Casasanto, D., "Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic Differences in Temporal Language and Thought" 58 (58): 63-79, 2008

      3 Casasanto, D., "Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Cross-linguistic Differences in Temporal Language and Thought" 58 (58): 63-79, 2008

      4 최문홍, "Visual Scene Description and Recall: On Differences between Korean and English Speakers" 언어교육원 51 (51): 197-223, 2015

      5 McDonough, L., "Understanding Spatial Relations : Flexible Infants, Lexical Adults" 46 : 229-259, 2003

      6 Robersona, D., "Thresholds for Color Discrimination in English and Korean Speakers" 112 : 482-487, 2009

      7 Pinker, S., "The Language Instinct" Harper Perennial Modern Classics 1994

      8 김남순, "Study Abroad Experiences for Korean EFL Student Teachers in a Large Philippine University" 한국현대언어학회 31 (31): 215-246, 2015

      9 Munnich, E., "Spatial Language and Spatial Representation : A Crosslinguistic Comparison" 81 : 171-207, 2001

      10 Bowerman, M., "Rethinking Linguistic Relativity" Cambridge University Press 145-176, 1996

      11 Bowerman, M., "Rethinking Linguistic Relativity" Cambridge University Press 145-176, 1996

      12 Casasanto, D., "Mirror Reading can Reverse the Flow of Time" 1432 : 473-479, 2014

      13 Casasanto, D., "Mirror Reading can Reverse the Flow of Time" 1432 : 473-479, 2014

      14 Odlin, T., "Linguistic Relativity in SLA: Thinking for Speaking" Multilingual Matters 183-194, 2010

      15 Wolff, P., "Linguistic Relativity" 2 : 253-265, 2011

      16 Choi, S., "Learning to Express Motion Events in English and Korean : The Influence of Language-specific Lexicalization Patterns" 41 : 83-121, 1991

      17 Whorf, B., "Language, Thought, and Reality" MIT Press 1956

      18 Lucy, J., "Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought" MIT Press 465-492, 2003

      19 Munnich, E., "Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought" MIT Press 113-155, 2003

      20 Malt, B. C., "Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought" MIT Press 81-111, 2003

      21 Li P., "Language and Spatial Reasoning" 3 : 265-294, 2002

      22 Levinson, S. C., "Language and Space" 25 : 353-382, 1996

      23 Lucy, J., "Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development" Cambridge University Press 257-283, 2001

      24 남현정, "L1 Mediation in L2 Lexical Access: Emerging Evidence from Word Association Tests" 현대영미어문학회 32 (32): 39-65, 2014

      25 남현정, "Konglish Phenomenon: L1 Activation in L2" 한국영어교육학회 66 (66): 191-211, 2011

      26 Ameel E, "How Bilinguals Solve the Naming Problem" 53 : 60-80, 2005

      27 Ameel E, "How Bilinguals Solve the Naming Problem" 53 : 60-80, 2005

      28 Forbes, J. N., "Grammatical Gender Affects Bilinguals’ Conceptual Gender : Implications for Linguistic Relativity and Decision Making" 1 : 68-76, 2008

      29 Lucy, J., "Grammatical Categories and Cognition" Cambridge University Press 1992

      30 Györi, G., "Evidence for Linguistic Relativity" John Benjamins 71-89, 2000

      31 Tsel, C-S, "Evidence Against Linguistic Relativity in Chinese and English : A Case Study of Spatial and Temporal Metaphors" 8 : 335-357, 2008

      32 Boroditsky, L., "Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time" 43 : 1-22, 2001

      33 Boroditsky, L., "Does Language Shape Thought? Mandarin and English Speakers’ Conceptions of Time" 43 : 1-22, 2001

      34 Tversky, B., "Cross-cultural and Developmental Trends in Graphic Productions" 23 : 515-557, 1991

      35 Smith, E. E., "Categories and Concepts" Harvard University Press 1981

      36 Roberson D., "Categorical Perception of Colour in the Left and Right Visual Field is Verbally Mediated : Evidence from Korean" 107 : 752-762, 2008

      37 Pavlenko, A., "Advances in the Neurolinguistics of Bilingualism" Forum 69-94, 2002

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.39 0.39 0.37
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.36 0.38 0.694 0.27
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼