RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    과학 공학적 실천에 의한 초등학교 과학 교과서 물질 영역의 탐구 활동 분석 = The Analysis of Inquiry Activity in the Material Domain of the Elementary Science Textbook by Science and Engineering Practices

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101897761

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    We examined the inquiry activities in the material domain of the elementary science textbooks and experimental workbooks based on 2009 revised curriculum. The analysis framework was SEP (Science and Engineering Practices) - ‘Asking questions and defining problems’, ‘developing and using models’, ‘planning and carrying out investigations’, ‘analyzing and interpreting data’, ‘using mathematics and computational thinking’, ‘constructing explanations and designing solutions’, ‘engaging in argument from evidence’, and ‘obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information’. Sub-SEP of each grade band were also used. The results showed that the 3rd~5th grade science textbooks and workbooks mainly emphasized ‘make observations and/or measurements’, ‘represent data in tables and/or various graphical displays’, or ‘use evidence to construct or support an explanation or design a solution to a problem’ among around 40 sub-SEP. In the case of the inquiry activities for 6th grade, majority of sub-SEP included were also only ‘collect data to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence to answer scientific questions or test design solutions’, ‘analyze and interpret data to provide evidence for phenomena’ or ‘construct a scientific explanation based on valid and reliable evidence obtained from sources’. The type of ‘asking questions and defining problems’, ‘using mathematics and computational thinking’ or ‘obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information’ were little found out of 8 SEP. Educational implications were discussed.
    번역하기

    We examined the inquiry activities in the material domain of the elementary science textbooks and experimental workbooks based on 2009 revised curriculum. The analysis framework was SEP (Science and Engineering Practices) - ‘Asking questions and def...

    We examined the inquiry activities in the material domain of the elementary science textbooks and experimental workbooks based on 2009 revised curriculum. The analysis framework was SEP (Science and Engineering Practices) - ‘Asking questions and defining problems’, ‘developing and using models’, ‘planning and carrying out investigations’, ‘analyzing and interpreting data’, ‘using mathematics and computational thinking’, ‘constructing explanations and designing solutions’, ‘engaging in argument from evidence’, and ‘obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information’. Sub-SEP of each grade band were also used. The results showed that the 3rd~5th grade science textbooks and workbooks mainly emphasized ‘make observations and/or measurements’, ‘represent data in tables and/or various graphical displays’, or ‘use evidence to construct or support an explanation or design a solution to a problem’ among around 40 sub-SEP. In the case of the inquiry activities for 6th grade, majority of sub-SEP included were also only ‘collect data to produce data to serve as the basis for evidence to answer scientific questions or test design solutions’, ‘analyze and interpret data to provide evidence for phenomena’ or ‘construct a scientific explanation based on valid and reliable evidence obtained from sources’. The type of ‘asking questions and defining problems’, ‘using mathematics and computational thinking’ or ‘obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information’ were little found out of 8 SEP. Educational implications were discussed.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 전성수, "초등학생의 과학적 의사소통능력과 과학 탐구능력, 논리적 사고력, 학업 성취도 수준과의 관계 분석" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 647-655, 2014

    2 조현준, "초등학교 과학 탐구 수업 실행의 저해 요인에 대한 교사들의 인식 분석" 한국과학교육학회 28 (28): 901-921, 2008

    3 임성만, "우리나라 역대 초등학교 교과서에서 다루어진 ‘지구과학’ 영역의 중심개념과 탐구활동 분석 및 차기 교과서 개선 방안 모색" 한국초등과학교육학회 34 (34): 288-296, 2015

    4 Schwab, J. J, "The teaching of science" Havard University Press 1-103, 1962

    5 Lotter, C, "The influence of repeated teaching and reflection on preservice teachers’ views of inquiry and nature of science" 20 : 553-582, 2009

    6 Lucero, M, "Teachers' beliefs and self-reported use of inquiry in science education in public primary schools" 35 (35): 1407-1423, 2013

    7 Ministry of Education, "Science curriculum"

    8 National Educational Association [NEA], "Report of the committee of ten on secondary school studies with the reports of the conferences arranged by the committee" The American Book Company 1894

    9 Anderson, R. D, "Reforming science teaching : What research says about inquiry" 13 (13): 1-12, 2002

    10 Krajcik, J, "Project based science" 8 (8): 25-27, 2015

    1 전성수, "초등학생의 과학적 의사소통능력과 과학 탐구능력, 논리적 사고력, 학업 성취도 수준과의 관계 분석" 한국과학교육학회 34 (34): 647-655, 2014

    2 조현준, "초등학교 과학 탐구 수업 실행의 저해 요인에 대한 교사들의 인식 분석" 한국과학교육학회 28 (28): 901-921, 2008

    3 임성만, "우리나라 역대 초등학교 교과서에서 다루어진 ‘지구과학’ 영역의 중심개념과 탐구활동 분석 및 차기 교과서 개선 방안 모색" 한국초등과학교육학회 34 (34): 288-296, 2015

    4 Schwab, J. J, "The teaching of science" Havard University Press 1-103, 1962

    5 Lotter, C, "The influence of repeated teaching and reflection on preservice teachers’ views of inquiry and nature of science" 20 : 553-582, 2009

    6 Lucero, M, "Teachers' beliefs and self-reported use of inquiry in science education in public primary schools" 35 (35): 1407-1423, 2013

    7 Ministry of Education, "Science curriculum"

    8 National Educational Association [NEA], "Report of the committee of ten on secondary school studies with the reports of the conferences arranged by the committee" The American Book Company 1894

    9 Anderson, R. D, "Reforming science teaching : What research says about inquiry" 13 (13): 1-12, 2002

    10 Krajcik, J, "Project based science" 8 (8): 25-27, 2015

    11 NGSS Lead States, "Next generation science standards: For states, by states" The National Academies Press 2013

    12 Ministry of Education and Science Technology, "Ministry of Education and Science Technology"

    13 Abd-El-Khalick, F, "Inquiry in science education : International perspectives" 88 (88): 397-419, 2004

    14 Wargo, B. M, "Incorporating science and engineering practices into preservice secondary science teachers’ planning practices: Testing the efficacy of an intervention" University of Pittsburgh 2014

    15 McNeill, K. L, "Elementary students' views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year" 48 (48): 793-823, 2011

    16 Stroupe, D, "Describing “Science Practice” in learning settings" 99 (99): 1033-1040, 2015

    17 Dewey, J, "Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education" The Macmillan Company 1916

    18 Martin-Hansen, L, "Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom" 69 (69): 34-37, 2002

    19 Ireland, J, "Approaches to inquiry teaching: Elementary teacher’s perspectives" 36 (36): 1733-1750, 2014

    20 Kim, Y. S, "Analysis of scientific and engineering practices within STEAM programs in Korea" Ewha Womans University Graduate School of Education 2015

    21 Asay, L. D, "Analysis of essential features of inquiry found in articles published in The Science Teacher, 1998-2007" 21 (21): 57-79, 2010

    22 Jeon, Y, "An analysis of inquiry activities in high school chemistry Ⅱ textbooks for the 2009 revised science curriculum: 8 Practices of science" Ewha Womans University Graduate School of Education 2015

    23 Zhai, J, "Am I like a scientist?’: Primary children’s images of doing science in school" 36 (36): 553-576, 2014

    24 National Research Council [NRC], "A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas" The National Academies Press 2012

    25 김지영, "2009 개정 교육과정 화학Ⅱ 교과서의 탐구 활동 분석" 한국과학교육학회 32 (32): 928-937, 2012

    26 강남화, "2009 개정 과학교육과정에 따른 고등학교 물리 교과서 탐구활동 분석" 한국과학교육학회 33 (33): 132-143, 2013

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.21 1.21 1.35
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.34 1.28 1.783 0.5
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼