RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      C-ITS 첨단도로 환경을 위한 엣지 네트워크 기반 교통상황인지 시스템의 설계 및 구현 = A Design and Implementation of Traffic Situation Recognition System Based on Edge Network for C-ITS Advanced Road Environments

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16062555

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      차세대 교통시스템으로 주목받고 있는 C-ITS(Cooperative-Intelligent
      Transport Systems)는 교통 분야의 최우선 해결과제인 교통안전과, 교
      통편의를 목표로 연구개발 및 현장 적용에 박차를 가하고 있다. 이에 따
      라 C-ITS의 요소 기술인 교통 정보 수집 기술, 도로 구성요소 간 연결
      기술, 교통정보 서비스 등 다양한 연구개발이 진행되고 있다. 그러나 현
      재 서비스되고 있는 교통시스템은 중앙집중식 교통정보 서비스 구조, 부
      족하고 미흡한 첨단 도로 인프라 및 도로 인프라 간 연결 기술은 고도화
      된 정보처리 서비스가 요구되는 C-ITS를 실현하기에 한계점이 있다.
      본 논문에서는 이러한 한계점을 극복하기 위해 도로 인프라 간의 연결
      및 정보처리 환경인 엣지 네트워크를 제안하였다. 엣지 네트워크는
      RSSI(Received Signal Strength Indicator)와 메시지 수신 횟수를 기반으
      로 인접한 노드의 그룹을 생성하는 하는 무선 네트워크 구축 기법으로,
      생성된 그룹 내의 정보 교환을 통해 효율적인 엣지 컴퓨팅 환경을 지원
      한다. 제안한 엣지 네트워크를 기반으로 교통흐름과 돌발 사고를 인지할
      수 있는 교통상황인지 시스템을 구축하였다. 구축한 교통상황인지 시스
      템은 교통정보 수집 및 제공 역할의 IoT 디바이스, IoT 디바이스 간 연
      결 기법인 엣지 네트워크, 교통흐름 및 교통사고 인지하는 교통상황 인
      지 알고리즘, 교통상황 모니터링 소프트웨어로 구성된다. 그리고 도로현
      장실험을 통해 교통흐름과 교통사고를 인지하고, 도로 이용자에게 정보
      를 전달하는 교통정보 서비스의 예를 제시하였다. 교통흐름 인지 기능은
      상시 동작하여 IoT 디바이스를 통해 교통흐름 상태를 표시하고, 사고발
      생 시 사고 상황을 인지하여 IoT 디바이스를 통해 현장에서 사고정보를
      표시한다. 교통상황 모니터링 소프트웨어에서는 지도 기반 모니터링 기
      능과 및 IoT 디바이스 상태관리 기능을 제공한다. 또한, 엣지 네트워크
      의 안정성과 효율성을 검증하기 위해 기존의 RSSI 기반 메시 네트워크
      와 제안한 엣지 네트워크를 대상으로 실험을 진행하였다. 실험결과 엣지
      네트워크에서의 데이터 전송률은 평균 97.04%, 데이터 전송 시간은 평균
      252.33ms, 네트워크 장애 복구시간은 평균 50798ms의 결과를 보였다.
      번역하기

      차세대 교통시스템으로 주목받고 있는 C-ITS(Cooperative-Intelligent Transport Systems)는 교통 분야의 최우선 해결과제인 교통안전과, 교 통편의를 목표로 연구개발 및 현장 적용에 박차를 가하고 있다...

      차세대 교통시스템으로 주목받고 있는 C-ITS(Cooperative-Intelligent
      Transport Systems)는 교통 분야의 최우선 해결과제인 교통안전과, 교
      통편의를 목표로 연구개발 및 현장 적용에 박차를 가하고 있다. 이에 따
      라 C-ITS의 요소 기술인 교통 정보 수집 기술, 도로 구성요소 간 연결
      기술, 교통정보 서비스 등 다양한 연구개발이 진행되고 있다. 그러나 현
      재 서비스되고 있는 교통시스템은 중앙집중식 교통정보 서비스 구조, 부
      족하고 미흡한 첨단 도로 인프라 및 도로 인프라 간 연결 기술은 고도화
      된 정보처리 서비스가 요구되는 C-ITS를 실현하기에 한계점이 있다.
      본 논문에서는 이러한 한계점을 극복하기 위해 도로 인프라 간의 연결
      및 정보처리 환경인 엣지 네트워크를 제안하였다. 엣지 네트워크는
      RSSI(Received Signal Strength Indicator)와 메시지 수신 횟수를 기반으
      로 인접한 노드의 그룹을 생성하는 하는 무선 네트워크 구축 기법으로,
      생성된 그룹 내의 정보 교환을 통해 효율적인 엣지 컴퓨팅 환경을 지원
      한다. 제안한 엣지 네트워크를 기반으로 교통흐름과 돌발 사고를 인지할
      수 있는 교통상황인지 시스템을 구축하였다. 구축한 교통상황인지 시스
      템은 교통정보 수집 및 제공 역할의 IoT 디바이스, IoT 디바이스 간 연
      결 기법인 엣지 네트워크, 교통흐름 및 교통사고 인지하는 교통상황 인
      지 알고리즘, 교통상황 모니터링 소프트웨어로 구성된다. 그리고 도로현
      장실험을 통해 교통흐름과 교통사고를 인지하고, 도로 이용자에게 정보
      를 전달하는 교통정보 서비스의 예를 제시하였다. 교통흐름 인지 기능은
      상시 동작하여 IoT 디바이스를 통해 교통흐름 상태를 표시하고, 사고발
      생 시 사고 상황을 인지하여 IoT 디바이스를 통해 현장에서 사고정보를
      표시한다. 교통상황 모니터링 소프트웨어에서는 지도 기반 모니터링 기
      능과 및 IoT 디바이스 상태관리 기능을 제공한다. 또한, 엣지 네트워크
      의 안정성과 효율성을 검증하기 위해 기존의 RSSI 기반 메시 네트워크
      와 제안한 엣지 네트워크를 대상으로 실험을 진행하였다. 실험결과 엣지
      네트워크에서의 데이터 전송률은 평균 97.04%, 데이터 전송 시간은 평균
      252.33ms, 네트워크 장애 복구시간은 평균 50798ms의 결과를 보였다.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      C-ITS(Cooperative-Intelligent Transport Systems), which is attracting
      attention as a next-generation transportation system, is spurring R&D
      and field application with the goal of traffic safety and transportation
      convenience, which are the top priorities in the transportation field.
      Various R&D such as information collection technology, road component
      connection technology, and traffic information service are underway as
      element technologies for C-ITS. However, the transportation system
      currently being serviced has limitations in implementing C-ITS, which
      requires advanced information processing services, due to the centralized
      traffic information service structure, insufficient and insufficient
      state-of-the-art road infrastructure and connection technology between
      road infrastructures.
      In this dissertation, to overcome these limitations, an edge network,
      which is an environment for connection and information processing
      between road infrastructures, is proposed. Edge networks are wireless
      network construction techniques that create groups between adjacent nodes
      based on RSSI and the number of message receptions, and support an
      efficient edge computing environment by exchanging information between
      nodes in the generated group. Based on the proposed edge network, a
      traffic situation recognition system was established to recognize traffic
      flows and unexpected accidents. The established traffic situation awareness
      system consists of IoT devices that collect and provide traffic information,
      edge network that is a connection technique between IoT devices, a traffic
      situation recognition algorithm that recognizes traffic flows and accidents,
      and traffic situation monitoring software. In addition, an example of a
      traffic information service that recognizes traffic flow and traffic accidents
      through road field experiments and delivers information to road users was
      presented. The traffic flow recognition function operates all the time to
      display the traffic flow status through the IoT device, recognizes the
      accident situation when an accident occurs, and displays accident
      information on the spot through the IoT device. The traffic condition
      monitoring software provides map-based monitoring functions and IoT
      device status management functions. In addition, to verify the stability and
      efficiency of the edge network, experiments were conducted on the
      existing RSSI-based mesh network and the proposed edge network. As a
      result of the experiment, the average data transmission rate in the edge
      network was 97.04%, the average data transmission time was 252.33ms,
      and the average network failure recovery time was 50798ms.
      번역하기

      C-ITS(Cooperative-Intelligent Transport Systems), which is attracting attention as a next-generation transportation system, is spurring R&D and field application with the goal of traffic safety and transportation convenience, which are the top pri...

      C-ITS(Cooperative-Intelligent Transport Systems), which is attracting
      attention as a next-generation transportation system, is spurring R&D
      and field application with the goal of traffic safety and transportation
      convenience, which are the top priorities in the transportation field.
      Various R&D such as information collection technology, road component
      connection technology, and traffic information service are underway as
      element technologies for C-ITS. However, the transportation system
      currently being serviced has limitations in implementing C-ITS, which
      requires advanced information processing services, due to the centralized
      traffic information service structure, insufficient and insufficient
      state-of-the-art road infrastructure and connection technology between
      road infrastructures.
      In this dissertation, to overcome these limitations, an edge network,
      which is an environment for connection and information processing
      between road infrastructures, is proposed. Edge networks are wireless
      network construction techniques that create groups between adjacent nodes
      based on RSSI and the number of message receptions, and support an
      efficient edge computing environment by exchanging information between
      nodes in the generated group. Based on the proposed edge network, a
      traffic situation recognition system was established to recognize traffic
      flows and unexpected accidents. The established traffic situation awareness
      system consists of IoT devices that collect and provide traffic information,
      edge network that is a connection technique between IoT devices, a traffic
      situation recognition algorithm that recognizes traffic flows and accidents,
      and traffic situation monitoring software. In addition, an example of a
      traffic information service that recognizes traffic flow and traffic accidents
      through road field experiments and delivers information to road users was
      presented. The traffic flow recognition function operates all the time to
      display the traffic flow status through the IoT device, recognizes the
      accident situation when an accident occurs, and displays accident
      information on the spot through the IoT device. The traffic condition
      monitoring software provides map-based monitoring functions and IoT
      device status management functions. In addition, to verify the stability and
      efficiency of the edge network, experiments were conducted on the
      existing RSSI-based mesh network and the proposed edge network. As a
      result of the experiment, the average data transmission rate in the edge
      network was 97.04%, the average data transmission time was 252.33ms,
      and the average network failure recovery time was 50798ms.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론················································································································· 1
      • 1. 연구의 배경 ······························································································· 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 ······························································································· 3
      • 3. 논문의 구성 ······························································································· 4
      • Ⅱ. 관련 연구······································································································ 5
      • Ⅰ. 서론················································································································· 1
      • 1. 연구의 배경 ······························································································· 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 ······························································································· 3
      • 3. 논문의 구성 ······························································································· 4
      • Ⅱ. 관련 연구······································································································ 5
      • 1. 국내·외 교통정보시스템 사례 ································································ 5
      • 가. 국내 교통정보시스템 ········································································ 5
      • 나. 국외 교통정보시스템 ········································································ 8
      • 2. 첨단교통정보와 교통 인프라································································· 9
      • 가. 첨단교통정보의 정의 ········································································ 9
      • 나. 정보수집 및 제공용 교통 인프라················································ 11
      • 3. 교통정보 활용 관련연구 ······································································· 11
      • 가. 돌발상황 검지 알고리즘의 분류 ·················································· 11
      • 나. 교통량 정보 활용 및 상황인지 관련연구 ·································· 15
      • 4. 엣지 컴퓨팅과 메시 네트워크 ··························································· 16
      • 가. 엣지 컴퓨팅의 개념 ········································································ 16
      • 나. 메시 네트워크의 개념 및 라우팅 알고리즘 ······························ 19
      • 다. RSSI 기반 라우팅 알고리즘 관련연구 ······································· 27
      • 5. 선행연구 고찰························································································· 28
      • Ⅲ. 엣지 네트워크 기반 교통상황인지 시스템의 구현······················ 29
      • 1. 시스템 설계 ····························································································· 29
      • 가. 설계 고려사항 ·················································································· 29
      • 나. 전체 시스템 구성 ············································································ 30
      • 다. IoT 디바이스··················································································· 31
      • 라. 엣지 네트워크 ·················································································· 33
      • 마. 교통상황인지 알고리즘 ·································································· 38
      • 바. 교통상황 모니터링 소프트웨어···················································· 48
      • 2. 시스템 구현 ····························································································· 53
      • 가. IoT 디바이스··················································································· 53
      • 나. 엣지 네트워크 ·················································································· 57
      • 다. 교통상황인지 알고리즘 ·································································· 60
      • 라. 교통상황 모니터링 소프트웨어···················································· 61
      • Ⅳ. 실험 및 결과 분석··················································································· 63
      • 1. 교통상황인지 시스템의 도로 현장실험············································· 63
      • 가. 실험환경 정의 ·················································································· 63
      • 나. 교통흐름 인지 실험결과 ································································ 65
      • 다. 교통사고 인지 실험결과 ································································ 68
      • 2. 엣지 네트워크 성능 분석····································································· 72
      • 가. 실험환경 정의 ·················································································· 72
      • 나. 데이터 전송률 실험결과 ································································ 74
      • 다. 데이터 전송시간 실험결과 ···························································· 78
      • 라. 네트워크 장애복구 시간 실험결과·············································· 82
      • 마. 네트워크 실험결과 종합 ································································ 86
      • Ⅴ. 결론··············································································································· 88
      • 참고문헌············································································································ 90
      • ABSTRACT ···································································································· 96
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1. 인공지능(AI) 기술 을 활용한 부산광역시 교통사고 예방 시스템, 조우진, 정석찬, 윤다현, 김진석, 이다희, 한국정보기술학회 2020년도 종합학술대회, pp.514-517, , 2020

      2. V2I 통신환경을 활용 한 연동교차로 교통신호 실시간 제어 연구, 한국 ITS학회 논문지, 제17권, 제3호, 한음, 윤일수, 이상수, 장기태, 박병규, 통권77호, , 2018

      1. 인공지능(AI) 기술 을 활용한 부산광역시 교통사고 예방 시스템, 조우진, 정석찬, 윤다현, 김진석, 이다희, 한국정보기술학회 2020년도 종합학술대회, pp.514-517, , 2020

      2. V2I 통신환경을 활용 한 연동교차로 교통신호 실시간 제어 연구, 한국 ITS학회 논문지, 제17권, 제3호, 한음, 윤일수, 이상수, 장기태, 박병규, 통권77호, , 2018

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼