RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    경찰 주취운전단속의 근거와 한계에 관한 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76250956

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Curbing on drunken drivers by the police should be understood as an operation for collecting datas and reviewing informations. The police investigate drivers whether they are driving while intoxicated or not. The investigation by police-officers is based on forceable articles of the law, so the compulsory operation should strictly have detailed contents on the law. : The based articles should be clear and specific. Laws in Korea opt law-governed administration as its fundamental principles. Thus, the operations of the police should be also suitable to law-governed administration. As the same reason, what police-officers check drivers driving in drunk should have an exact cause lawfully. But in reality, Road-Traffic Law gives the police sufficient rooms to swing in controlling drunk drivers. In the 41th article that is a basic regulation of checking drunken drivers, the Road-Traffic Law says curbing on drunk drivers can be done only when there is a reasonable cause that the police think it is necessary. It gives the police some spare to interpret it freely, so the article should be reformed into a precise content because it is against the principles of the law-governed administration.
    There are two limitations in police-officers' activities of checking whether drivers are on the wheel while drunken.: a limit on regulation and a limit on general reason. First, the restraint on regulation is that the operation should be done to cause the least damages on traffic stream , traffic security and drivers, etc. It should also have a clear ground on law. Second, the one on general reason is that when police-officers implement the curb, they have to make sure traffic safety and not to cause traffic jam.
    번역하기

    Curbing on drunken drivers by the police should be understood as an operation for collecting datas and reviewing informations. The police investigate drivers whether they are driving while intoxicated or not. The investigation by police-officers is ba...

    Curbing on drunken drivers by the police should be understood as an operation for collecting datas and reviewing informations. The police investigate drivers whether they are driving while intoxicated or not. The investigation by police-officers is based on forceable articles of the law, so the compulsory operation should strictly have detailed contents on the law. : The based articles should be clear and specific. Laws in Korea opt law-governed administration as its fundamental principles. Thus, the operations of the police should be also suitable to law-governed administration. As the same reason, what police-officers check drivers driving in drunk should have an exact cause lawfully. But in reality, Road-Traffic Law gives the police sufficient rooms to swing in controlling drunk drivers. In the 41th article that is a basic regulation of checking drunken drivers, the Road-Traffic Law says curbing on drunk drivers can be done only when there is a reasonable cause that the police think it is necessary. It gives the police some spare to interpret it freely, so the article should be reformed into a precise content because it is against the principles of the law-governed administration.
    There are two limitations in police-officers' activities of checking whether drivers are on the wheel while drunken.: a limit on regulation and a limit on general reason. First, the restraint on regulation is that the operation should be done to cause the least damages on traffic stream , traffic security and drivers, etc. It should also have a clear ground on law. Second, the one on general reason is that when police-officers implement the curb, they have to make sure traffic safety and not to cause traffic jam.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 주취운전 단속의 의의 및 법적 성격
    • Ⅲ. 주취운전 단속의 법적 근거
    • Ⅳ. 주취운전단속의 한계
    • Ⅴ. 끝맺는 말
    • Ⅰ. 머리말
    • Ⅱ. 주취운전 단속의 의의 및 법적 성격
    • Ⅲ. 주취운전 단속의 법적 근거
    • Ⅳ. 주취운전단속의 한계
    • Ⅴ. 끝맺는 말
    • 參考文獻
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "헌재, 2004.1.29. 2002헌마293." 2004.1.29.2002헌마293.

    2 "최신행정법강의 하" 박영사 1998.

    3 "최신행정법(하)" 법문사 1996.

    4 "일반행정법론 하" 1993.

    5 "음주운전단속메뉴얼" 중앙경찰학교 2002.

    6 "도로교통안전백서" 경찰청 2004.

    7 "대판, 1998. 5. 8 97다54482." 1998-,

    8 "경찰실무전서" _ 2000.

    9 "경찰권발동에 관한 연구" 1992.

    10 "경찰관 불심검문에 관한 연구" 12 : 2003.6.

    1 "헌재, 2004.1.29. 2002헌마293." 2004.1.29.2002헌마293.

    2 "최신행정법강의 하" 박영사 1998.

    3 "최신행정법(하)" 법문사 1996.

    4 "일반행정법론 하" 1993.

    5 "음주운전단속메뉴얼" 중앙경찰학교 2002.

    6 "도로교통안전백서" 경찰청 2004.

    7 "대판, 1998. 5. 8 97다54482." 1998-,

    8 "경찰실무전서" _ 2000.

    9 "경찰권발동에 관한 연구" 1992.

    10 "경찰관 불심검문에 관한 연구" 12 : 2003.6.

    11 實務法令硏究會編, "警察權限實務集" 1992.

    12 阿南一成, "交通警察槪論Ⅲ" 1985.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-09-14 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Law Review -> Law Review KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-07-10 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Law Review -> Korean Law Review KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2005-05-30 학술지명변경 한글명 : 法學硏究 -> 법학연구 KCI등재후보
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.02 1.02 1.05
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.07 1.02 1.083 0.19
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼