본 연구는 기업형태를 자율성 측면과 기업 규모 측면으로 구분하여 그 주요 특성에 따른 신제품 개발역량과 아이디어의 원천을 규명하고자 하였다. 신제품 개발역량에 있어, 외국자회사가 ...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A77054989
2006
Korean
KCI등재후보
학술저널
412-434(23쪽)
4
0
상세조회0
다운로드본 연구는 기업형태를 자율성 측면과 기업 규모 측면으로 구분하여 그 주요 특성에 따른 신제품 개발역량과 아이디어의 원천을 규명하고자 하였다. 신제품 개발역량에 있어, 외국자회사가 ...
본 연구는 기업형태를 자율성 측면과 기업 규모 측면으로 구분하여 그 주요 특성에 따른 신제품 개발역량과 아이디어의 원천을 규명하고자 하였다. 신제품 개발역량에 있어, 외국자회사가 국내기업에 비해 우수하고, 중소기업이 대기업에 비해 우수한 것으로 나타났다. 신제품 개발을 위한 아이디어의 원천에 있어서는 기업 내부자원의 활용도와 기업 외부자원의 활용도의 비교에 있어 독립기업이 광범위한 외부 자원 네트워크를 가진 그룹계열사에 비해 외부자원을 더 활발히 활용하고 있으며, 국내기업이 외국자회사에 비해 내부자원과 외부자원 모두를 더 활발히 활용하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한, 다양한 외부자원의 흡수ㆍ통합 역량의 차이로 중소기업은 내부자원을 더 활발히 활용하고 있었고, 대기업은 기업 외부자원을 더 활발히 활용하는 것으로 분석되었다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Investigation into the sources of firms' ideas for new product development is very important because the capabilities of developing new products determine the competitiveness of a firm. This study aims at drawing the managerial implications for new pr...
Investigation into the sources of firms' ideas for new product development is very important because the capabilities of developing new products determine the competitiveness of a firm. This study aims at drawing the managerial implications for new product development in terms of the autonomy and the size of firms. To do this, this study analyzes how the capabilities of developing new products and the sources of ideas are different by the types of firms. More concretely, it compares differences in the capabilities of developing new products between types of firms, and in the sources of ideas for new product development between internal sources and external sources.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Buckley, P. J, "he Future of the Multinational Enterprise" London: McMillan 1976
2 Kleinknecht, A, "Why do Firms Cooperate on R&D? An Empirical Study" 21 : 347-360, 1992
3 Arundel, A, "What Percentage of Innovation are Patented? Empirical Estimates for European Firms" 27 : 127-141, 1988
4 Rothwell, R, "The Role of Small Firms in Technological Innovation" London: Gower 2 : 114-139, 1986
5 Kogut B, "The Effect of Country Cultures on the Choice of Entry Mode" 19 (19): 411-423, 1988
6 Braga, H, "Technological Imports and Technological Efforts: An Analysis of Their Determinants in Brazilian Firms" 39 : 421-432, 1991
7 Shy, O, "Strategic Outsourcing" 50 : 203-224, 2003
8 Park, H, "Sources and Consequences of Communication Problems in Foreign Subsidiaries: The Case of United States Firms in South Korea" 5 (5): 79-98, 1996
9 Rycroft, R. W, "Self-organizing Innovation Networks: Implications for Globalization" 24 : 187-197, 2004
10 Henderseon, R, "Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery" 27 : 32-59, 1996
1 Buckley, P. J, "he Future of the Multinational Enterprise" London: McMillan 1976
2 Kleinknecht, A, "Why do Firms Cooperate on R&D? An Empirical Study" 21 : 347-360, 1992
3 Arundel, A, "What Percentage of Innovation are Patented? Empirical Estimates for European Firms" 27 : 127-141, 1988
4 Rothwell, R, "The Role of Small Firms in Technological Innovation" London: Gower 2 : 114-139, 1986
5 Kogut B, "The Effect of Country Cultures on the Choice of Entry Mode" 19 (19): 411-423, 1988
6 Braga, H, "Technological Imports and Technological Efforts: An Analysis of Their Determinants in Brazilian Firms" 39 : 421-432, 1991
7 Shy, O, "Strategic Outsourcing" 50 : 203-224, 2003
8 Park, H, "Sources and Consequences of Communication Problems in Foreign Subsidiaries: The Case of United States Firms in South Korea" 5 (5): 79-98, 1996
9 Rycroft, R. W, "Self-organizing Innovation Networks: Implications for Globalization" 24 : 187-197, 2004
10 Henderseon, R, "Scale, Scope, and Spillovers: The Determinants of Research Productivity in Drug Discovery" 27 : 32-59, 1996
11 Rothwell, R, "SAPPHO Updated-project SAPPHO Phase 2" 3 : 258-291, 1974
12 Choung, J. Y, "Patterns of Innovation in Korea and Taiwan" 45 : 357-365, 1998
13 Kuemmerle, W, "Optimal Scale for Research and Development in Foreign Environment: An Investigation into Size and Performance of Research and Development Laboratories Abroad" 27 : 111-126, 1998
14 Park, Y. T, "On the Characteristics of Innovative Firms in Korea: The Role of R&D and Innovation Type" 3 (3): 111-131, 1999
15 Ethier, W, "Multinational Firms, Technology Diffusion and Trade" 41 : 1-28, 1996
16 Bernheim, B. D, "Multimarket Contact and Collusive Behavior" 21 : 1-26, 1990
17 Archibugi, D, "Measuring Technological Change through Patents and Innovation Surveys" 16 (16): 451-468, 1996
18 Lunn, J, "Market Structure, Firm Structure and Research and Development" 26 : 31-44, 1986
19 Harzing, A. W. K, "Managing the Multinationals: an International Study of Control Mechanism" Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing 1999
20 Bartlett, C. A, "Managing across Borders: The Transnational Solution, 2nd ed." Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press 1988
21 Bughin, J, "Managerial Efficiency and the Schumpeterian Link between Size, Market Structure and Innovation Revisited" 23 : 653-659, 1994
22 Weistein, D, "Japanese Corporate Groups: Collusive or Competitive? An Empirical Investigation of Keiretsu Behavior" 43 : 359-376, 1995
23 Graves, S. B, "Innovative Productivity and Returns to Scale in the Pharmaceutical Industry" 14 : 593-605, 1993
24 Acs, Z, "Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis" 78 : 678-690, 1988
25 Hobday, M, "Innovation in East Asia" Hants, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 1995
26 Mariotti, S, "Information Costs and Location of FDIs within the Host Country: Empirical Evidence for Italy" 26 (26): 815-841, 1995
27 Worley, J, "Industrial Research and the New Competition" 69 : 183-186, 1961
28 Mansfield, E, "Industrial Research and Development Expenditures: Determinants, Prospects and Relation of Size of Firm and Inventive Output, Prospects and Relation of Size of Firm and Inventive Output" 72 : 319-340, 1964
29 Gerybadze, A, "Globalization of R&D: Recent Changes in the Management of Innovation in Transnational Corporations" 28 : 251-274, 1999
30 Kim, L, "From Imitation to Innovation: Dynamics of Korea’s Technological Learning" Boston: Harvard Business School Press 1998
31 Davies, R. B, "Fragmentation of Headquarter Services and FDI" 16 : 61-79, 2005
32 Veugelers, R, "Foreign Subsidiaries as a Channel of International Technology Diffusion: Some Direct Firm Level Evidence from Belgium" 48 : 455-476, 2004
33 Kumar, N, "Firm Size, Opportunities for Adaptation and In-house R&D Activity in Developing Countries: The Case of Indian Manufacturing" 25 : 713-722, 1996
34 Horowitz, I, "Firm Size and Research Activity" 29 : 298-301, 1962
35 Berger, P. G, "Diversification’s Effect on Firm Value" 37 : 39-65, 1995
36 Doi, N, "Diversification and R&D Activity in Japanese Manufacturing Firms" 6 (6): 147-152, 1985
37 Hofstede, G, "Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values" Beverley Hills, CA: Sage Publications 1980
38 Lorenzoni, G, "Creating a Strategic Center to Manage a Web of Partners" 146-163, 1995
39 Scherer, F, "Corporate Size, Diversification, and Innovative Activity, in Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives" Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 222-238, 1984
40 Mahmood, I. P, "Business Groups: Entry Barrier-innovation Debate Revisited" 54 : 513-531, 2004
41 Freeman, C, "A Study of Success and Failure in Industrial Innovation, in Science and Technology in Economic Growth" London: MacMillan 227-245, 1973
기업혁신 수단으로서 사원제안제도의 영향요인에 관한 연구 : 제조업과 비제조업 비교
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 등재 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2009-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2007-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2005-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 등재 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.31 | 1.31 | 1.14 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 1.21 | 1.2 | 1.278 | 0.16 |