RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    은유의 진리값

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101712163

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Objectivist semantists claim that metaphor has no truth value from the perspective of their truth theory. We reject this kind of claim and suggest that metaphor may be thought to have truth value if we take a new perspective of metaphor of conceptual metaphor theory. Within this theory, Lakoff and Johnson propose a new truth definition, as follows: we understand a statement as being true in a given situation when our understanding of the statement fits our understanding of the situation closely enough for our purposes. We think this definition may be broad enough to apply to all the cases of direct description and some cases of indirect description in which metaphor is included. But we think this definition may face a problem in dealing with virtual phenomena, not taking the blending theory into consideration. Therefore, we propose a kind of revised version, taking it into consideration, as follows: we understand a statement as being brue in a given situation when our understanding of the statement and our understanding of virtual entities in the virtual plane fit our understanding of the actual situation closely enough for our purposes. This version is thought to broad enough to impose truth value on metaphor.
    번역하기

    Objectivist semantists claim that metaphor has no truth value from the perspective of their truth theory. We reject this kind of claim and suggest that metaphor may be thought to have truth value if we take a new perspective of metaphor of conceptual ...

    Objectivist semantists claim that metaphor has no truth value from the perspective of their truth theory. We reject this kind of claim and suggest that metaphor may be thought to have truth value if we take a new perspective of metaphor of conceptual metaphor theory. Within this theory, Lakoff and Johnson propose a new truth definition, as follows: we understand a statement as being true in a given situation when our understanding of the statement fits our understanding of the situation closely enough for our purposes. We think this definition may be broad enough to apply to all the cases of direct description and some cases of indirect description in which metaphor is included. But we think this definition may face a problem in dealing with virtual phenomena, not taking the blending theory into consideration. Therefore, we propose a kind of revised version, taking it into consideration, as follows: we understand a statement as being brue in a given situation when our understanding of the statement and our understanding of virtual entities in the virtual plane fit our understanding of the actual situation closely enough for our purposes. This version is thought to broad enough to impose truth value on metaphor.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2001-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.93 0.93 0.83
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.85 1.647 0.45
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼