RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      면접 지원자의 인상관리행동과 평가자의 성향조절초점이 지원자 평가에 미치는 영향 = Effects of Interviewee's Impression Management Behavior and Interviewer's Chronic Regulatory Focus on Evaluation of Interviewee

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15111093

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of interviewee's impression management behavior and interviewer's chronic regulatory focus on evaluation of interviewee. The experiment used 2(interviewee's impression management behavior: self-focused / other-focused) × 2(interviewer's chronic regulatory focus: promotion focus / prevention focus) between subject design. To manipulate interviewee's impression management behavior, two different forms of scenario were developed. In the scenario which contains self-focused impression management behavior, the interviewee used 'self-promotion', 'entitlements', and 'overcoming obstacle' to give good impression to interviewer. In the scenario which contains other-focused impression management behavior, the interviewee used 'opinion conformity', 'other enhancements', and 'fit-with-organization' to give good impression to interviewer. These two scenarios were randomly distributed to participants. Interviewer's chronic regulatory focus was measured by Chun(2008)'s Korean scale which was translated from Oschan et al.(2007)'s scale. Participants responded to total 16 items(i.e., 8 promotion focus items and 8 prevention focus items; 5-point Likert style). To calculate chronic regulatory focus index, sum of promotion focus items was subtracted from sum of prevention focus items. Then participants were categorized into two groups by using median split method for this index. As a result, 155 participants were placed on one of four experimental conditions. For the 'intention to recruit' dependent variable, significant two-way interaction effects were found. The simple main effect analysis of the significant interaction effect of the interviewee's impression management behavior and the interviewer's chronic regulatory focus revealed that promotion-focused interviewers showed higher degree of 'intention to recruit' compared to prevention-focused interviewers only when the interviewee's impression management behaviors were self-focused. Also, for the 'expectation of the interviewee's job performance' dependent variable, marginally significant two-way interaction effects were found. The simple main effect analysis of the significant interaction effect of the two independent variables revealed that promotion-focused interviewers expected higher degree of job performance compared to prevention-focused interviewers only when the interviewee's impression management behaviors were self-focused. The implications and limitations of the study were discussed.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of interviewee's impression management behavior and interviewer's chronic regulatory focus on evaluation of interviewee. The experiment used 2(interviewee's impression management behavior: self-focu...

      The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of interviewee's impression management behavior and interviewer's chronic regulatory focus on evaluation of interviewee. The experiment used 2(interviewee's impression management behavior: self-focused / other-focused) × 2(interviewer's chronic regulatory focus: promotion focus / prevention focus) between subject design. To manipulate interviewee's impression management behavior, two different forms of scenario were developed. In the scenario which contains self-focused impression management behavior, the interviewee used 'self-promotion', 'entitlements', and 'overcoming obstacle' to give good impression to interviewer. In the scenario which contains other-focused impression management behavior, the interviewee used 'opinion conformity', 'other enhancements', and 'fit-with-organization' to give good impression to interviewer. These two scenarios were randomly distributed to participants. Interviewer's chronic regulatory focus was measured by Chun(2008)'s Korean scale which was translated from Oschan et al.(2007)'s scale. Participants responded to total 16 items(i.e., 8 promotion focus items and 8 prevention focus items; 5-point Likert style). To calculate chronic regulatory focus index, sum of promotion focus items was subtracted from sum of prevention focus items. Then participants were categorized into two groups by using median split method for this index. As a result, 155 participants were placed on one of four experimental conditions. For the 'intention to recruit' dependent variable, significant two-way interaction effects were found. The simple main effect analysis of the significant interaction effect of the interviewee's impression management behavior and the interviewer's chronic regulatory focus revealed that promotion-focused interviewers showed higher degree of 'intention to recruit' compared to prevention-focused interviewers only when the interviewee's impression management behaviors were self-focused. Also, for the 'expectation of the interviewee's job performance' dependent variable, marginally significant two-way interaction effects were found. The simple main effect analysis of the significant interaction effect of the two independent variables revealed that promotion-focused interviewers expected higher degree of job performance compared to prevention-focused interviewers only when the interviewee's impression management behaviors were self-focused. The implications and limitations of the study were discussed.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구목적 및 필요성 1
      • 2. 면접 2
      • 3. 인상관리행동 3
      • 1) 인상관리의 개념 3
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구목적 및 필요성 1
      • 2. 면접 2
      • 3. 인상관리행동 3
      • 1) 인상관리의 개념 3
      • 2) 인상관리행동의 유형 4
      • 3) 자기위주 인상관리행동과 타인위주 인상관리행동 7
      • 4. 성향조절초점이론 9
      • 1) 조절초점이론 9
      • 2) 성향조절초점 10
      • 5. 직무수행능력과 대인관계능력 12
      • 1) 직무수행능력의 개념 12
      • 2) 대인관계능력의 개념 13
      • 6. 성향조절초점과 인상관리행동의 상호작용 14
      • 1) 평가자의 향상초점과 지원자의 자기위주 인상관리행동 14
      • 2) 평가자의 예방초점과 지원자의 타인위주 인상관리행동 15
      • 7. 인상관리행동과 직무수행, 대인관계능력 평가의 상호작용 15
      • 1) 자기위주 인상관리행동과 직무수행능력 16
      • 2) 타인위주 인상관리행동과 대인관계능력 16
      • 8. 연구과제 및 가설 17
      • 1) 연구과제 17
      • 2) 연구가설 18
      • Ⅱ. 실험방법 및 절차 19
      • 1. 실험 참가자 19
      • 2. 실험 설계 및 절차 19
      • 1) 실험 설계 19
      • 2) 실험 시나리오 개발 19
      • 3) 실험 절차 20
      • 3. 측정도구 20
      • 1) 성향조절초점전략 측정 20
      • 2) 종속 측청치 21
      • Ⅲ. 결과 23
      • 1. 성향조절초점 척도의 신뢰도 23
      • 2. 독립 변인 조작 효과 23
      • 3. 인상관리행동과 성향조절초점에 따른 지원자 평가 24
      • Ⅳ. 논의 30
      • 참고문헌 33
      • 영문초록 40
      • 부 록 42
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼