RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    북한 핵협상시의 검증 문제 연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82257909

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper tries to answer those questions; how the verifications issues have been dealt with and what were the major problems of it since the North Korean nuclear program had became an important international security issue since 1993; and how should we handle the verification issues in the future. The state parties of the six-party talks could conclude a joint statement committing the participants to achieving “the verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula” on 19 September 2005. However, they could not agree on how to verify North Korea’s commitment on denuclearization, which became one of major factors what made the six-party talks stalled since December 2008. It is important to make sure reliable verification mechanisms are provided in the future arms control agreement with such a country as North Korea whose external credit level is low. But North Korean leaders tend to suspect that the other countries might utilize the verification measures to spy on its national secret. Furthermore North Korea might not want to give up its nuclear weapon. If North Korea does not allow internationally accepted verification measures in a future agreement on the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula, it means the North would not give up it nuclear weapon.
    번역하기

    This paper tries to answer those questions; how the verifications issues have been dealt with and what were the major problems of it since the North Korean nuclear program had became an important international security issue since 1993; and how should...

    This paper tries to answer those questions; how the verifications issues have been dealt with and what were the major problems of it since the North Korean nuclear program had became an important international security issue since 1993; and how should we handle the verification issues in the future. The state parties of the six-party talks could conclude a joint statement committing the participants to achieving “the verifiable denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula” on 19 September 2005. However, they could not agree on how to verify North Korea’s commitment on denuclearization, which became one of major factors what made the six-party talks stalled since December 2008. It is important to make sure reliable verification mechanisms are provided in the future arms control agreement with such a country as North Korea whose external credit level is low. But North Korean leaders tend to suspect that the other countries might utilize the verification measures to spy on its national secret. Furthermore North Korea might not want to give up its nuclear weapon. If North Korea does not allow internationally accepted verification measures in a future agreement on the denuclearization of the Korean peninsula, it means the North would not give up it nuclear weapon.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 황일도, "한승주 전 외무장관의 북핵 대응전략" 304-313,

    2 김근식, "캠벨식‘포괄적 패키지’의 진실 혹은 거짓"

    3 조동준, "왜 핵무기를 폐기할까?: 남아공 핵폐기 사례"

    4 조민, "오바마 행정부와 북한 핵문제: 대타협이냐, 대파국이냐" 통일연구원 학술회의 총서 2009

    5 프리쳐드, "실패한 외교" 사계절 2008

    6 백승혁, "북한 우라늄 농축 프로그램 동결 및 기술적 검증" 34 : 2003

    7 마자르, "마이클 J.(김태규 역)."북한 핵 뛰어넘기"" 흥림문화사 1996

    8 국방부, "대량살상무기 문답백과: 화.생.방 미사일 얼마나 알고 계십니까?" 국방부 2001

    9 남만권, "군비통제 이론과 실제" 한국국방연구원 2004

    10 전성훈, "군비통제 검증 연구: 이론 및 역사와 사례를 중심으로" 민족통일연구원 1992

    1 황일도, "한승주 전 외무장관의 북핵 대응전략" 304-313,

    2 김근식, "캠벨식‘포괄적 패키지’의 진실 혹은 거짓"

    3 조동준, "왜 핵무기를 폐기할까?: 남아공 핵폐기 사례"

    4 조민, "오바마 행정부와 북한 핵문제: 대타협이냐, 대파국이냐" 통일연구원 학술회의 총서 2009

    5 프리쳐드, "실패한 외교" 사계절 2008

    6 백승혁, "북한 우라늄 농축 프로그램 동결 및 기술적 검증" 34 : 2003

    7 마자르, "마이클 J.(김태규 역)."북한 핵 뛰어넘기"" 흥림문화사 1996

    8 국방부, "대량살상무기 문답백과: 화.생.방 미사일 얼마나 알고 계십니까?" 국방부 2001

    9 남만권, "군비통제 이론과 실제" 한국국방연구원 2004

    10 전성훈, "군비통제 검증 연구: 이론 및 역사와 사례를 중심으로" 민족통일연구원 1992

    11 May, Michael ed, "Verifying the Agreed Framework"

    12 Potter, "Verification and Arms Control" Lexiton Books 1985

    13 U.N. Verification in All Its Aspects, "Study on the Role of the United Nations in the Field of Verification" 28 : 1990

    14 Nikitin, Mary Beth, "North Korea’s Second Nuclear Test: Implications of U.N. Security Council Resolution 1874" CRS Report for Congress 2009

    15 Niksch, Larry A., "North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons Development and Diplomacy" CRS Report for Congress 2009

    16 Nikitin, Mary Beth, "North Korea’s Nuclear Weapons" CRS Report for Congress 2009

    17 Segal, Leon V., "North Korea Policy on the Rocks: What Can Be Done to Restore Constructive Engagement?" 4 (4): 2009

    18 U.N. Verification in All Its Aspects, "Including the Role of the United Nations in the Field of Verification" 22 : 1995

    19 IAEA, "Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Socialist Peole’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya" 12 : 2008

    20 IPFM, "Global Fissile Material Report 2009: A Path to Nuclear Disarmament"

    21 Kessler, Glenn, "Far-reaching U.S. plan impaired N. Korea deal; demands began to undo nuclear accord,”및“Verification Measures Discussion Paper"

    22 Squassoni, Sharon, "Disarming Libya: Weapons of Mass Destruction" CRS Report for Congress 2006

    23 Phillips, James, "Disarming Iraq: The Lessons of UNSCOM" The Heritage Foundation Backgrounder Executive Summary 2002

    24 Albright, David, "Cooperative Verified Dismantlement of Nuclear Program: An EyToward North Korea"

    25 Pieragostini, Karl, "Cooperating to Reduce Uncertainty" 30 (30): 1986

    26 UNIDIR and VERTIC, "Coming to Terms with Security: A Handbook on Verification and Compliance" UN 2003

    27 Cleminson, F. R., "A Conceptual Working Paper on Arms Control Verification" Department of External Affairs 1986

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2018-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-03-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Studies -> Korean Journal of International Relations KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2010-12-01 등재 학술지 분리 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2010-06-22 학술지명변경 외국어명 : The Korean Journal of International Relations -> The Korean Journal of International Studies KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.91 0.91 1.12
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.07 1.09 1.415 0.17
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼