RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      대학 행정기록물 관리현황과 개선방안 -K대학을 중심으로- = The Status and Improvement Plan of Administrative Records Management of University : Focusing on K university*

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T15794134

      • 저자
      • 발행사항

        대구 : 경북대학교대학원, 2021

      • 학위논문사항

        학위논문 (석사) -- 경북대학교대학원 , 기록학과 , 2021. 2

      • 발행연도

        2021

      • 작성언어

        한국어

      • DDC

        025.17 판사항(23)

      • 발행국(도시)

        대구

      • 형태사항

        iv, 88 p. : 삽화 ; 26 cm

      • 일반주기명

        지도교수: 이성신
        참고문헌 수록

      • UCI식별코드

        I804:22001-000000099102

      • 소장기관
        • 경북대학교 중앙도서관 소장기관정보
      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      (Abstract)

      The Public Records Act was enacted in 2000, and each national university established a record center and hired a record manager, but until now, the management of university records has not reached the evaluation standard. In this regard, the National Archives of Korea (NDL) included the task of encouraging self-inspection in its university records management guidelines.
      In this study, the actual state of record management of the colleges and departments' administrative offices of K University was investigated and the improvement plan was presented through records management and operation status of other university record centers established as independent systems.
      The results of the survey and interviews with staffs working at the colleges and departments' administrative offices of K University on the actual state and awareness of records management are as follows.
      First, staffs of the administrative office of colleges and departments didn’t systematically carry out records management due to the lack of knowledge and headquarters-centered records management. Futhermore, the guidelines for records management of departments and colleges were not clear.
      Second, staffs of the administrative office of colleges and departments felt the need for records management and education, but records management work was perceived as having a lower importance than other tasks and thus was recognized as incidental work.
      Through the analysis of the above results, the problems of K university records management were eventually seen as 'poor records management of colleges and departments', 'lack of awareness of records management of the staff 'and ' difficulties to the operation of the university record center'. The improvement plan for the aforementioned problems are as follows.
      First, measures to voluntarily participate in the recording work should be devised to improve the awareness of records management by the staff of colleges and departments.
      Second, guidelines for records management of colleges and departments should be prepared, and education should be developed and implemented through the opinions of the staff.
      Third, one record researcher is currently in charge of records management, and there is a limit to work all the role of public records management, university history records management, and permanent record center. Therefore, increasing of manpower and reorganizing of records center is needed.
      Fourth, the policy for records management, such as the establishment of essential education for records management education, accurate standard establishment for the role of university record center, and development of evaluation tools suitable for university characteristics, should be improved.
      Records of colleges and departments are primary evidence of administration and should be systematically managed given the importance of information and value. In addition, if records management is carried out systematically from the production stage, records will prove the history of the university in the future and instill pride in the university's members.
      번역하기

      (Abstract) The Public Records Act was enacted in 2000, and each national university established a record center and hired a record manager, but until now, the management of university records has not reached the evaluation standard. In this regard, t...

      (Abstract)

      The Public Records Act was enacted in 2000, and each national university established a record center and hired a record manager, but until now, the management of university records has not reached the evaluation standard. In this regard, the National Archives of Korea (NDL) included the task of encouraging self-inspection in its university records management guidelines.
      In this study, the actual state of record management of the colleges and departments' administrative offices of K University was investigated and the improvement plan was presented through records management and operation status of other university record centers established as independent systems.
      The results of the survey and interviews with staffs working at the colleges and departments' administrative offices of K University on the actual state and awareness of records management are as follows.
      First, staffs of the administrative office of colleges and departments didn’t systematically carry out records management due to the lack of knowledge and headquarters-centered records management. Futhermore, the guidelines for records management of departments and colleges were not clear.
      Second, staffs of the administrative office of colleges and departments felt the need for records management and education, but records management work was perceived as having a lower importance than other tasks and thus was recognized as incidental work.
      Through the analysis of the above results, the problems of K university records management were eventually seen as 'poor records management of colleges and departments', 'lack of awareness of records management of the staff 'and ' difficulties to the operation of the university record center'. The improvement plan for the aforementioned problems are as follows.
      First, measures to voluntarily participate in the recording work should be devised to improve the awareness of records management by the staff of colleges and departments.
      Second, guidelines for records management of colleges and departments should be prepared, and education should be developed and implemented through the opinions of the staff.
      Third, one record researcher is currently in charge of records management, and there is a limit to work all the role of public records management, university history records management, and permanent record center. Therefore, increasing of manpower and reorganizing of records center is needed.
      Fourth, the policy for records management, such as the establishment of essential education for records management education, accurate standard establishment for the role of university record center, and development of evaluation tools suitable for university characteristics, should be improved.
      Records of colleges and departments are primary evidence of administration and should be systematically managed given the importance of information and value. In addition, if records management is carried out systematically from the production stage, records will prove the history of the university in the future and instill pride in the university's members.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구필요성 및 목적 1
      • 2. 연구내용 및 방법 2
      • 3. 선행연구 3
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 7
      • Ⅰ. 서론 1
      • 1. 연구필요성 및 목적 1
      • 2. 연구내용 및 방법 2
      • 3. 선행연구 3
      • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 7
      • 1. 대학의 기능과 조직 7
      • 2. 대학기록물 범위와 유형 9
      • 3. 대학기록관리 14
      • Ⅲ. 국립대학교 기록관리 현황 20
      • 1. 서울대학교 기록관 20
      • 2. 부산대학교 기록관 23
      • 3. 부경대학교 기록관 27
      • 4. 국립대학교 기록관 기록관리 현황 비교 29
      • Ⅳ. K대학 기록관리 현황 및 개선방안 31
      • 1. 조직구성과 업무 31
      • 2. 처리과 기록관리 38
      • 3. 기록관 기록관리 60
      • 4. 결과분석 63
      • 5. 개선방안 68
      • Ⅴ. 결론 72
      • 참 고 문 헌 74
      • 영 문 초 록 77
      • <부록 A> K대학 단과대학행정실 기록관리에 대한 설문지 79
      • <부록 B> K대학 학과행정실 기록관리에 대한 설문지 84
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼