RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      병원중간관리자의 리더십과 조직혁신성 간의 관계에서 구성원 성숙도의 조절효과분석 = A Study on the Influence of Middle Managers` Leadership on Organizational Innovation in General Hospitals -Focused on the Moderating Effect of Employee`s Readiness

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101942302

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The study was conducted to compare organizational innovation depending on the leadership type of middle managers in general hospital. Moreover, the study was also to prove whether employees.readiness causes any differences to the link between leadership and organizational innovation. The result is based on 769 sheets of survey paper answered by administrations and nurses working at general hospitals or the same level of hospitals located in the metropolitan area. The methods of analysis used are as follows: reliability analysis, frequency analysis, t-test, ANOVA, multiple regression analysis, and hierarchical regression analysis. Main results of the study can be summarized as below. First, by analyzing the influence of task-behavior leadership on organizational innovation, R squre on knowledge management which is organizational innovation factor was 12.5%, R squre on creativity was 9.1%, and R squre on innovation behavior was 10.3%. Regression model appeared to be statistically significant as well. Both taskbehavior and relationship-behavior leadership have influence on organizational innovation and it is learned that relationship-behavior leadership has a bigger influence on all the organizational innovation factors. Second, moderating effect of the employee.s readiness is examined in terms of the link between leadership and organizational innovation. As a result, the member.s readiness had positive influence when it comes to the link between leadership and organizational innovation. Also, after verifying moderating effect of readiness (ability/ willingness), this study shows that ability readiness has positive influence on the link between task-behavior(or relationship-behavior) leadership and creativity, and innovation behavior while willingness readiness positively influences the link between task-behavior(or relationship-behavior) leadership and creativity & innovation behavior. To summarize results of the study, this study shows that the members who possess high readiness also have high organizational innovation, which promises their positive role in a group.
      번역하기

      The study was conducted to compare organizational innovation depending on the leadership type of middle managers in general hospital. Moreover, the study was also to prove whether employees.readiness causes any differences to the link between leadersh...

      The study was conducted to compare organizational innovation depending on the leadership type of middle managers in general hospital. Moreover, the study was also to prove whether employees.readiness causes any differences to the link between leadership and organizational innovation. The result is based on 769 sheets of survey paper answered by administrations and nurses working at general hospitals or the same level of hospitals located in the metropolitan area. The methods of analysis used are as follows: reliability analysis, frequency analysis, t-test, ANOVA, multiple regression analysis, and hierarchical regression analysis. Main results of the study can be summarized as below. First, by analyzing the influence of task-behavior leadership on organizational innovation, R squre on knowledge management which is organizational innovation factor was 12.5%, R squre on creativity was 9.1%, and R squre on innovation behavior was 10.3%. Regression model appeared to be statistically significant as well. Both taskbehavior and relationship-behavior leadership have influence on organizational innovation and it is learned that relationship-behavior leadership has a bigger influence on all the organizational innovation factors. Second, moderating effect of the employee.s readiness is examined in terms of the link between leadership and organizational innovation. As a result, the member.s readiness had positive influence when it comes to the link between leadership and organizational innovation. Also, after verifying moderating effect of readiness (ability/ willingness), this study shows that ability readiness has positive influence on the link between task-behavior(or relationship-behavior) leadership and creativity, and innovation behavior while willingness readiness positively influences the link between task-behavior(or relationship-behavior) leadership and creativity & innovation behavior. To summarize results of the study, this study shows that the members who possess high readiness also have high organizational innovation, which promises their positive role in a group.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Davenport TH., "Who's bringing you hot ideas and how are you responding?" 81 (81): 59-64, 2003

      2 Zhou J., "When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity : Encouraging the expression of voice" 44 (44): 682-696, 2001

      3 Kanter RM., "When a thousand flowers bloom :structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization"

      4 Nichols AL., "What do people desire in their leaders? The role of leadership level on trait desirability" 25 (25): 711-729, 2014

      5 Dunphy DC., "Transformational and coercive strategies for planned organizatioanl change : beyond the OD Model" 9 (9): 317-334, 1988

      6 Baron RM., "The moderator-mediator varible distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, Strategic, Statistical considerations" 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986

      7 Becker SW., "The innovative organization : a selective view of current theory and research" 462-469, 1967

      8 Abou-Zeid ES., "The effectiveness of innovation : a knowledge management approach" 8 (8): 261-274, 2004

      9 Alavi M., "Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues" 107-136, 2001

      10 Bin Ahmad KZ., "Relationship between leader-.subordinate personality congruence and performance and satisfaction in the UK" 29 (29): 396-411, 2008

      1 Davenport TH., "Who's bringing you hot ideas and how are you responding?" 81 (81): 59-64, 2003

      2 Zhou J., "When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity : Encouraging the expression of voice" 44 (44): 682-696, 2001

      3 Kanter RM., "When a thousand flowers bloom :structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization"

      4 Nichols AL., "What do people desire in their leaders? The role of leadership level on trait desirability" 25 (25): 711-729, 2014

      5 Dunphy DC., "Transformational and coercive strategies for planned organizatioanl change : beyond the OD Model" 9 (9): 317-334, 1988

      6 Baron RM., "The moderator-mediator varible distinction in social psychological research : Conceptual, Strategic, Statistical considerations" 51 (51): 1173-1182, 1986

      7 Becker SW., "The innovative organization : a selective view of current theory and research" 462-469, 1967

      8 Abou-Zeid ES., "The effectiveness of innovation : a knowledge management approach" 8 (8): 261-274, 2004

      9 Alavi M., "Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues" 107-136, 2001

      10 Bin Ahmad KZ., "Relationship between leader-.subordinate personality congruence and performance and satisfaction in the UK" 29 (29): 396-411, 2008

      11 Redmond MR., "Putting creativity to work : Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity" 55 (55): 120-151, 1993

      12 Dobbs, K., "Plagued by turnover? Train your managers" 37 (37): 62-66, 2000

      13 Min J., "Organizational Management" DaeYoung 2014

      14 Kim g., "Organizational Innovation" Korean Studies Information 2011

      15 Baek KB., "Organizational Behavior Research" Changminsa 2014

      16 Jones G., "Organization theory" Pearson education 2010

      17 Cumming TG., "Organization Development and Change" West Publishing 1989

      18 Lee HS., "Marketing Survey" Jibhyunjae 2012

      19 Quinn JB, "Managing innovation : controlled chaos" 63 (63): 73-84, 1985

      20 Hersey P., "Management of orga-nizational behavior : utilizing human resources" Prentice-Hall 1993

      21 Yukl GA., "Leadership in organizations" PEARSON 2013

      22 Stogdill RM., "Leader Behavior. Its description and measurement" Bureau of Business Research. the Ohio State University 1957

      23 Filius R., "Knowledge management in the HRD office : a comparison of three cases" 12 (12): 286-295, 2000

      24 Glass AJ., "International technology transfer & the technology gap" 55 (55): 369-398, 1988

      25 Ettlie, JE., "Innovative attitudes, values, and intertions in organizations" 19 (19): 163-182, 1982

      26 Drucker P., "Innovation and entrepreneurship :practice and principles" Harper Business Press 1993

      27 Krause DE, "Influence-based leadership as a determinant of the inclination to innovate and of innovation-related behaviors : An empirical investigation" 15 (15): 79-102, 2004

      28 Epitropaki O., "Implicit leadership theories in applied settings : Factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time" 89 (89): 293-310, 2004

      29 De Jong JP., "How leaders influence employees' innovative behaviour" 10 (10): 41-64, 2007

      30 Oldham GR., "Employee creativity : Personal and contextual factors at work" 39 (39): 607-634, 1996

      31 Scott SG., "Determinants of innovative behavior : A path model of individual innovation in the workplace" 37 (37): 580-607, 1994

      32 Mumford MD., "Creativity syndrome : integration, application, and innovation" 103 (103): 27-43, 1988

      33 Zhou J., "Awakening employee creativity : The role of leader emotional intelligence" 14 (14): 545-568, 2003

      34 Kim SH, "A study on the effect of the leadershiip type of hospital middle management on orga-nizational menbers ʼ job satisfaction, organization immersion and turnover intention" keimyung University 2009

      35 Ahn BJ, "A study on the effect of leadership type of superiors on the organizational effectiveness and job performance" Dongguk University 2013

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.76 0.76 0.66
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.55 0.55 1.13 0.1
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼