일본 ‘전후 역사학’의 전개와 미완의 가지무라(梶村) 사학 = 국가와 민중은 어떻게 (재)발견되었는가

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

It is necessary to understand Japanese social science in the late 20th century, especially the academic movement called ‘post-war historiography(戰後歷史學)’, to capture the changes of Kajimura’s research agenda and methodical viewpoint. I set Kajimura’s research on the modern history of Korea against the background of Japanese research on history and tried to review it based on my research on the history of historiography.
In fact, Kajimura played an important role in creating the theory of the East Asian world which was presented by the Historical Science Society of Japan(歷史學硏究會), and utilized it in of his own research on Korean history. Even though it is beyond doubt that he was stimulated by the people’s movement of contemporary Korea, first and foremost, Kajimura would not have been able to develop the conception of the history of the people after the late 1970’s, had he not conducted research on the history of people’s struggle(人民鬪爭史) and the history of people’s thought(民衆思想史) which were among the big schools of Japanese historiography at the time. Based on his research, Kajimura kept trying to improve his own methodical viewpoint until shortly before his death, and stroved to paint an overall picture of the modern history of Korea which combined the two focuses, the state and the people.
I tried to determined how Kajimura’s deepening of his immanent development theory was related with trend in Japanese and world historiography, by tracing the above points from the viewpoint of the history of historiography. At the same time, I paid attention to the meaning of Kajimura’s historiography in the context of the history of historiography as well as the historiography on Korea, and explained why Kajimura’s historiography is still relevant.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• I. 들어가며
• Ⅱ. 가지무라는 어떻게 잊혀졌는가
• Ⅲ. ‘내재적 발전론’과 전후 역사학
• Ⅳ . 가지무라의 내재적 발전론의 심화?변용을 재촉한 두 가지 요인
• Ⅴ. 1980년대의 심화 - 미완의 가지무라 사학
• Ⅵ. 마치며
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 岸本美緒, "風俗と時代観〈明清史論集Ⅰ〉" 研文出版 2012

2 梶村秀樹, "近代朝鮮の商人資本等の外圧への諸対応：甲午以後(1894∼1904年)期の『商権』問題と生産過程" (560) : 148-158, 1986

3 宮嶋博史, "近代(Ⅰ)｣, In アジア歴史研究入門２ 中国Ⅱ·朝鮮" 同朋舎出版 313-344, 1983

4 戸邉秀明, "社会運動史としての戦後歴史学研究のために：史学史の再検討にむけたいくつかの提言" (600) : 194-218, 2012

5 趙景達, "異端の民衆反乱：東学と甲午農民戦争" 岩波書店 1998

6 梶村秀樹, "甲山火田民事件(1929年)について, In 旗田巍先生古稀記念会編『朝鮮歴史論集』下巻" 龍渓書舎 381-409, 1979

7 板垣雄三, "民族と民主主義, In 『歴史学研究』別冊特集｢歴史における民族と民主主義：1973年度歴史学研究会大会報告｣" 2-8, 1973

8 板垣雄三, "歴史家 遠山茂樹と〈東アジア〉歴史像" (895) : 2-13, 2012

9 梶村秀樹, "歴史と文学：朝鮮史の場合" (409) : 53-60, 1984

10 趙景達, "植民地期朝鮮の知識人と民衆：植民地近代性論批判" 有志舎 2008

11 梶村秀樹, "梶村 朝鮮史の枠組と思想" 研文出版 288-289, 1982

12 宮嶋博史, "東アジア小農社会の形成, In アジアから考える6 長期社会変動" 東京大学出版会 67-96, 1994

13 梶村秀樹, "東アジア地域における帝国主義体制への移行, In 発展途上経済の研究" 世界書院 53-79, 1981

14 岸本美緒, "東アジア史の｢パラダイム転換｣をめぐって, In ｢韓国併合｣100年を問う：2010年国際シンポジウム" 岩波書店 228-239, 2011

15 宮嶋博史, "東アジアにおける近代化、植民地化をどう捉えるか, In 植民地近代の視座：朝鮮と日本" 岩波書店 167-192, 2004

16 梶村秀樹, "朝鮮近代史研究における内在的発展の視角, In 東アジア世界史探究" 汲古書院 575-588, 1986

17 梶村秀樹, "朝鮮近代史の若干の問題" (288) : 55-63, 1964

18 趙景達, "朝鮮民衆運動の展開：士の論理と救済思想" 岩波書店 2002

19 梶村秀樹, "旧韓末北関地域経済と内外貿易" 神奈川大学 26 (26): 297-326, 1990

20 梶村秀樹, "旧植民地社会構成体論, In 発展途上経済の研究" 世界書院 81-108, 1981

21 宮嶋博史, "方法としての東アジア：東アジア三国における近代への移行をめぐって" (412) : 9-39, 1984

22 梶村秀樹, "新幹会研究のためのノート" 49 : 181-212, 1968

23 梶村秀樹, "排外主義克服のための朝鮮史" 青年アジア研究会 1990

24 二宮宏之, "戦後歴史学と社会史, In 戦後歴史学再考" 青木書店 123-147, 2000

25 並木真人, "戦後日本における朝鮮近代史研究の現段階：『内在的発展論』再考" (482) : 15-30, 1990

26 戸邉秀明, "戦後史学史のなかの安丸民衆史：ある全体性のゆくえ, In 安丸思想史への射程" ぺりかん社 53-79, 2010

27 宮嶋博史, "光武改革論" (586) : 12-22, 1988

28 宮嶋博史, "儒教的近代としての東アジア『近世』, In 岩波講座 東アジア近現代通史１" 岩波書店 53-78, 2010

29 梶村秀樹, "『民族資本』と『隷属資本』：植民地体制下の朝鮮ブルジョワジーの政治経済的性格解明のためのカテゴリーの再検討, In 梶村 『朝鮮における資本主義の形成と展開』" 龍渓書舎 213-242, 1977

30 梶村秀樹, "〈報告予告概要〉近代朝鮮の商人資本等の外圧への諸対応" (554) : 56-57, 1986

31 姜元鳳, "1960年代梶村秀樹の朝鮮史認識：戦後朝鮮史研究における内在的発展論の展開と分岐" 東京学芸大学 (59) : 27-41, 2012

32 梶村秀樹, "1920∼30年代の民衆運動, In 朝鮮の近代史と日本" 大和書房 254-266, 1987

33 梶村秀樹, "1910年代朝鮮の経済循環と小農経営, In 朝鮮近代の経済構造" 日本評論社 203-248, 1990

34 戸邉秀明, "'민중사상사' 연구의 출발―야스마루 요시오(安丸良夫)의 방법적 혁신, In 역사학의 세기: 20세기 한국과 일본의 역사학" 휴머니스트 397-439, 2009