RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Usefulness Evaluation of Low-dose CT for Emphysema : Compared with High-resolution CT

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102124218

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    본 연구에서는 폐기종에 대해 고해상도 CT와 비교한 저선량 CT 의 유용성에 대해 평가하였다. 고해상도 CT와 저선량 CT 노출조건에서 선량과 영상 잡음을 3회 반복 측정하였다. 비슷한 노출조건에서 획득한 146명의 고해상도 CT와 저선량 CT 영상에 대해 2명의 흉부영상의학과전문의 합의 판독결과에서 폐기종 소견 만을 본 연구에 사용하였다. SPSS ver. 19.0 프로그램 사용하여 고해상도 CT와 저선량 CT 간에 폐기종에 대한 진단 차이는 McNemar’s tests, 일치도는 unweighted kappa tests, 선량과 잡음 차이는 Mann-Whitney U-test 로 분석하였다.
    선량은 고해상도 CT가 저선량 CT 보다 높았지만(1.95 mGy vs. 0.35 mGy, p=0.008), 잡음은 낮았다(40.1 HU vs. 99.6 HU, p=0.021). 폐기종 진단에 대해서는 두 영상 간에 높은 일치도를 보였다(k-value=0.88). 폐기종 점수는 두 영상 간에 통계적인 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았고, 높은 상관성을 보였다(r=0.599, p < 0.001).
    선량과 잡음을 고려했을 때, 저선량 CT는 폐기종 진단에 표준 진단 방법 인 고해상도 CT를 대신하여 사용할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.
    번역하기

    본 연구에서는 폐기종에 대해 고해상도 CT와 비교한 저선량 CT 의 유용성에 대해 평가하였다. 고해상도 CT와 저선량 CT 노출조건에서 선량과 영상 잡음을 3회 반복 측정하였다. 비슷한 노출조...

    본 연구에서는 폐기종에 대해 고해상도 CT와 비교한 저선량 CT 의 유용성에 대해 평가하였다. 고해상도 CT와 저선량 CT 노출조건에서 선량과 영상 잡음을 3회 반복 측정하였다. 비슷한 노출조건에서 획득한 146명의 고해상도 CT와 저선량 CT 영상에 대해 2명의 흉부영상의학과전문의 합의 판독결과에서 폐기종 소견 만을 본 연구에 사용하였다. SPSS ver. 19.0 프로그램 사용하여 고해상도 CT와 저선량 CT 간에 폐기종에 대한 진단 차이는 McNemar’s tests, 일치도는 unweighted kappa tests, 선량과 잡음 차이는 Mann-Whitney U-test 로 분석하였다.
    선량은 고해상도 CT가 저선량 CT 보다 높았지만(1.95 mGy vs. 0.35 mGy, p=0.008), 잡음은 낮았다(40.1 HU vs. 99.6 HU, p=0.021). 폐기종 진단에 대해서는 두 영상 간에 높은 일치도를 보였다(k-value=0.88). 폐기종 점수는 두 영상 간에 통계적인 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았고, 높은 상관성을 보였다(r=0.599, p < 0.001).
    선량과 잡음을 고려했을 때, 저선량 CT는 폐기종 진단에 표준 진단 방법 인 고해상도 CT를 대신하여 사용할 수 있을 것으로 사료된다.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of low-dose CT (LDCT) for emphysema compared with high-resolution CT (HRCT).
    Measurements of radiation dose and noise were repeated 3 times in same exposure condition which was similar with obtaining HRCT and LDCT images. We analysed reading results of 146 subjects. Six images per participants selected for emphysema grading. Emphysema was graded for all 6 zones on the left and right sides of the lungs by the consensus reading of two chest radiologists using a 4-point scale. Between the HRCT and LDCT images, diagnostic differences and agreements for emphysema were analyzed by McNemar’s and unweighted kappa tests, and radiation doses and noise by a Mann-Whitney U-test, using the SPSS 19.0 program.
    Radiation dose from HRCT was significantly higher than that of LDCT, but the noise was significantly lower in HRCT than in LDCT. Diagnostic agreement for emphysema between HRCT and LDCT images was excellent (k-value=0.88). Emphysema grading scores were not significantly different between HRCT and LDCT images for all six lung zones. Emphysema grading scores from LDCT images were significantly correlated with increased scores on HRCT images (r=0.599, p < 0.001).
    Considering the tradeoff between radiation dose and image noise, LDCT could be used as the gold standard method instead of HRCT for emphysema detection and grading.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of low-dose CT (LDCT) for emphysema compared with high-resolution CT (HRCT). Measurements of radiation dose and noise were repeated 3 times in same exposure condition which was similar with obt...

    The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of low-dose CT (LDCT) for emphysema compared with high-resolution CT (HRCT).
    Measurements of radiation dose and noise were repeated 3 times in same exposure condition which was similar with obtaining HRCT and LDCT images. We analysed reading results of 146 subjects. Six images per participants selected for emphysema grading. Emphysema was graded for all 6 zones on the left and right sides of the lungs by the consensus reading of two chest radiologists using a 4-point scale. Between the HRCT and LDCT images, diagnostic differences and agreements for emphysema were analyzed by McNemar’s and unweighted kappa tests, and radiation doses and noise by a Mann-Whitney U-test, using the SPSS 19.0 program.
    Radiation dose from HRCT was significantly higher than that of LDCT, but the noise was significantly lower in HRCT than in LDCT. Diagnostic agreement for emphysema between HRCT and LDCT images was excellent (k-value=0.88). Emphysema grading scores were not significantly different between HRCT and LDCT images for all six lung zones. Emphysema grading scores from LDCT images were significantly correlated with increased scores on HRCT images (r=0.599, p < 0.001).
    Considering the tradeoff between radiation dose and image noise, LDCT could be used as the gold standard method instead of HRCT for emphysema detection and grading.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
    • Ⅱ. MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Ⅲ. RESULTS
    • Ⅳ. DISCUSSION
    • Abstract
    • Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION
    • Ⅱ. MATERIALS AND METHODS
    • Ⅲ. RESULTS
    • Ⅳ. DISCUSSION
    • REFERENCES
    • 국문초록
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 이원정, "분진에 노출되었던 집단의 흉부 저선량 CT영상 소견" 대한방사선과학회 34 (34): 305-314, 2011

    2 MMller NL, "“Density mask”. An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography" 94 (94): 782-787, 1988

    3 Kuwano K, "The diagnosis of mild emphysema. Correlation of computed tomography and pathology scores" 141 (141): 169-178, 1990

    4 Suganuma N, "Reliability of the proposed international classification of high-resolution computed tomography for occupational and environmental respiratory diseases" 51 (51): 210-222, 2009

    5 Sverzellati N, "Relationship and prognostic value of modified coronary artery calcium score, FEV1, and emphysema in lung cancer screening population: the MILD trial" 262 (262): 460-467, 2012

    6 Huda W, "Radiation doses and risks in chest computed tomography examinations" 4 (4): 316-320, 2007

    7 Smith-Bindman R, "Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer" 169 (169): 2078-2086, 2009

    8 Bankier AA, "Pulmonary emphysema: subjective visual grading versus objective quantification with macroscopic morphometry and thin-section CT densitometry" 211 (211): 851-858, 1999

    9 Goldman LW, "Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality" 35 (35): 213-225, 2007

    10 Gevenois PA, "Macroscopic assessment of pulmonary emphysema by image analysis" 48 (48): 318-322, 1995

    1 이원정, "분진에 노출되었던 집단의 흉부 저선량 CT영상 소견" 대한방사선과학회 34 (34): 305-314, 2011

    2 MMller NL, "“Density mask”. An objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography" 94 (94): 782-787, 1988

    3 Kuwano K, "The diagnosis of mild emphysema. Correlation of computed tomography and pathology scores" 141 (141): 169-178, 1990

    4 Suganuma N, "Reliability of the proposed international classification of high-resolution computed tomography for occupational and environmental respiratory diseases" 51 (51): 210-222, 2009

    5 Sverzellati N, "Relationship and prognostic value of modified coronary artery calcium score, FEV1, and emphysema in lung cancer screening population: the MILD trial" 262 (262): 460-467, 2012

    6 Huda W, "Radiation doses and risks in chest computed tomography examinations" 4 (4): 316-320, 2007

    7 Smith-Bindman R, "Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer" 169 (169): 2078-2086, 2009

    8 Bankier AA, "Pulmonary emphysema: subjective visual grading versus objective quantification with macroscopic morphometry and thin-section CT densitometry" 211 (211): 851-858, 1999

    9 Goldman LW, "Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality" 35 (35): 213-225, 2007

    10 Gevenois PA, "Macroscopic assessment of pulmonary emphysema by image analysis" 48 (48): 318-322, 1995

    11 Horiuchi N, "Low-dose multislice CT and high-resolution CT assessment of pulmonary emphysema in public school teachers" 185 (185): 25-30, 2007

    12 Fasola G, "Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer and pleural mesothelioma in an asbestos-exposed population:baseline results of a prospective, nonrandomized feasibility trial--an Alpe-adria Thoracic Oncology Multidisciplinary Group Study" 12 (12): 1215-1224, 2007

    13 Naidich DP, "Low-dose CT of the lungs: preliminary observations" 175 (175): 729-731, 1990

    14 Takahashi M, "Low-Dose Spiral Computed Tomography of the Thorax Comparison with the Standard-Dose Technique" 33 (33): 68-73, 1998

    15 Kusaka Y, "International Classification of HRCT for Occupational and Environmental Respiratory Diseases" Springer-Verlag 2005

    16 Takahashi M, "Imaging of pulmonary emphysema: a pictorial review" 3 (3): 193-204, 2008

    17 Majurin ML, "High-resolution CT of the lung in asbestos-exposed subjects. Comparison of low-dose and high-dose HRCT" 35 (35): 473-477, 1994

    18 Nishio M, "Emphysema quantification by low-dose CT: potential impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction using 3D processing" 199 (199): 595-601, 2012

    19 Blum T, "Computed tomography for diagnosis and grading of dust-induced occupational lung disease" 14 (14): 135-140, 2008

    20 Gierada DS, "Comparison of standard- and low-radiation-dose CT for quantification of emphysema" 188 (188): 42-47, 2007

    21 Rumack CM, "2010 ACR presidential address, patient-focused radiology: Taking charge of radiation dose" 7 (7): 837-844, 2010

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
    2011-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2009-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
    2008-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2007-05-08 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한방사선기술학회 -> 대한방사선과학회
    영문명 : Korean Society Of Radiologial Technology -> Korean Society of Radiological Science
    KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.37 0.37 0.38
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.4 0.41 0.487 0.08
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼