The Influence of Reconstruction Algorithm and Heart Rate on Coronary Artery Image Quality and Stenosis Detection at 64-Detector Cardiac CT

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: We wanted to evaluate the impact of two reconstruction algorithms (halfscan and multisector) on the image quality and the accuracy of measuring the severity of coronary stenoses by using a pulsating cardiac phantom with different heart rates (HRs).
Materials and Methods: Simulated coronary arteries with different stenotic severities (25, 50, 75%) and different luminal diameters (3, 4, 5 mm) were scanned with a fixed pitch of 0.16 and a 0.35 second gantry rotation time on a 64-slice multidetector CT. Both reconstruction algorithms (halfscan and multisector) were applied to HRs of 40-120 beats per minute (bpm) at 10 bpm intervals. Three experienced radiologists visually assessed the image quality and they manually measured the stenotic severity.
Results: Fewer measurement errors occurred with multisector reconstruction (p = 0.05), a slower HR (p < 0.001) and a larger luminal diameter (p = 0.014); measurement errors were not related with the observers or the stenotic severity. There was no significant difference in measurements as for the reconstruction algorithms below an HR of 70 bpm. More nonassessable segments were visualized with halfscan reconstruction (p = 0.004) and higher HRs (p < 0.001). Halfscan reconstruction had better quality scores when the HR was below 60 bpm, while multisector reconstruction had better quality scores when the HR was above 90 bpm. For the HRs between 60 and 90 bpm, both reconstruction modes had similar quality scores. With excluding the nonassessable segments, both reconstruction algorithms achieved a similar mean measured stenotic severity and similar standard deviations.
Conclusion: At a higher HR (above 90 bpm), multisector reconstruction had better temporal resolution, fewer nonassessable segments, better quality scores and better accuracy of measuring the stenotic severity in this phantom study.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Objective: We wanted to evaluate the impact of two reconstruction algorithms (halfscan and multisector) on the image quality and the accuracy of measuring the severity of coronary stenoses by using a pulsating cardiac phantom with different heart rates (HRs).
Materials and Methods: Simulated coronary arteries with different stenotic severities (25, 50, 75%) and different luminal diameters (3, 4, 5 mm) were scanned with a fixed pitch of 0.16 and a 0.35 second gantry rotation time on a 64-slice multidetector CT. Both reconstruction algorithms (halfscan and multisector) were applied to HRs of 40-120 beats per minute (bpm) at 10 bpm intervals. Three experienced radiologists visually assessed the image quality and they manually measured the stenotic severity.
Results: Fewer measurement errors occurred with multisector reconstruction (p = 0.05), a slower HR (p < 0.001) and a larger luminal diameter (p = 0.014); measurement errors were not related with the observers or the stenotic severity. There was no significant difference in measurements as for the reconstruction algorithms below an HR of 70 bpm. More nonassessable segments were visualized with halfscan reconstruction (p = 0.004) and higher HRs (p < 0.001). Halfscan reconstruction had better quality scores when the HR was below 60 bpm, while multisector reconstruction had better quality scores when the HR was above 90 bpm. For the HRs between 60 and 90 bpm, both reconstruction modes had similar quality scores. With excluding the nonassessable segments, both reconstruction algorithms achieved a similar mean measured stenotic severity and similar standard deviations.
Conclusion: At a higher HR (above 90 bpm), multisector reconstruction had better temporal resolution, fewer nonassessable segments, better quality scores and better accuracy of measuring the stenotic severity in this phantom study.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Nieman K, "Reliable noninvasive coronary angiography with fast submillimeter multislice spiral computed tomography" 106 : 2051-2054, 2002

2 Leber AW, "Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound" 46 : 147-154, 2005

3 Hoffmann MH, "Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate" 234 : 86-97, 2005

4 Hui H, "Multislice helical CT: image temporal resolution" 19 : 384-390, 2000

5 Dewey M, "Multisegment and halfscan reconstruction of 16-slice computed tomography for detection of coronary artery stenoses" 39 : 223-229, 2004

6 Flohr TG, "Multi-detector row CT systems and imagereconstruction techniques" 235 : 756-773, 2005

7 Abada HT, "MDCT of the coronary arteries: feasibility of low-dose CT with ECG-pulsed tube current modulation to reduce radiation dose" 186 : S387-S390, 2006

8 Schroeder S, "Influence of heart rate on vessel visibility in noninvasive coronary angiography using new multislice computed tomography: experience in 94 patients" 26 : 106-111, 2002

9 Dewey M, "Influence of heart rate on diagnostic accuracy and image quality of 16-slice CT coronary angiography: comparison of multisegment and halfscan reconstruction approaches" 17 : 2829-2837, 2007

10 Lembcke A, "Imaging of the coronary arteries by means of multislice helical CT: optimization of image quality with multisegmental reconstruction and variable gantry rotation time" 175 : 780-785, 2003

11 Wintersperger BJ, "Image quality, motion artifacts, and reconstruction timing of 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography with 0.33-second rotation speed" 41 : 436-442, 2006

12 Mollet NR, "High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography" 112 : 2318-2323, 2005

13 Flohr T, "Heart rate adaptive optimization of spatial and temporal resolution for electrocardiogram-gated multislice spiral CT of the heart" 25 : 907-923, 2001

14 Begemann PG, "Evaluation of spatial and temporal resolution for ECG-gated 16-row multidetector CT using a dynamic cardiac phantom" 15 : 1015-1026, 2005

15 Kachelriess M, "Electrocardiogram-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond spiral computed tomography scans of the heart" 25 : 2417-2431, 1998

16 Desjardins B, "ECG-gated cardiac CT" 182 : 993-1010, 2004

17 Kachelriess M, "ECG-correlated image reconstruction from subsecond multi-slice spiral CT scans of the heart" 27 : 1881-1902, 2000

18 Herzog C, "Does two-segment image reconstruction at 64-section CT coronary angiography improve image quality and diagnostic accuracy?" 244 : 121-129, 2007

19 Raff GL, "Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography" 46 : 52-557, 2005

20 Ropers D, "Detection of coronary artery stenoses with thin-slice multi-detector row spiral computed tomography and multiplanar reconstruction" 107 : 664-666, 2003

21 Funabashi N, "Coronary artery: quantitative evaluation of normal diameter determined with electron-beam CT compared with cine coronary angiography initial experience" 226 : 263-271, 2003

22 Wicky S, "Comparative study with a moving heart phantom of the impact of temporal resolution on image quality with two multidetector electrocardiography-gated computed tomography units" 27 : 392-398, 2003

23 Shechter G, "Cardiac image reconstruction on a 16-slice CT scanner using a retrospectively ECG-gated, multi-cycle 3D back-projection algorithm. in: Medical imaging 2003: image processing-proceedings, Vol 5032" Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers 1820-1828, 2003

24 Budoff MJ, "Cardiac CT imaging: diagnosis of cardiovascular disease" Springer 1-18, 2006

25 Leschka S, "Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience" 26 : 1482-1487, 2005