RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Generative AI Art and Creative Subjectivity: A Mixed-Methods Study Based on Grounded Theory and CRITIC

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A110039516

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    With the rapid application of Generative AI technologies in image generation, style transfer, and creative assistance, the process and logic of artistic creation are undergoing a profound transformation. However, research on how AI art platforms influence creators' subjectivity remains limited, and few studies have systematically examined users' real-world experiences. To bridge this gap, this study investigated three representative AI art platforms — Midjourney, Runway ML, and Stable Diffusion —using a mixed-methods approach that integrates grounded theory and the CRITIC method. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 experienced AI art practitioners between March and May 2025, and a theoretical framework comprising three core categories, 12 main categories, and 29 initial categories was constructed through grounded theory coding. Building on these findings, we distributed a structured questionnaire using a 7-point Likert scale to 426 participants from June to August 2025, and we quantitatively evaluated the relative importance of the main categories using CRITIC analysis. The results showed that control over expressive outcomes (w₁ = 0.106) and technical accessibility of model customization (w₉ = 0.103) were the two highest-weighted factors, indicating that creators prioritize autonomy and usability in AI-mediated art-making. In contrast, aspects such as cultural bias in training data and algorithmic transparency received lower weights, reflecting a limited awareness of structural issues in AI systems. Synthesizing the qualitative and quantitative findings, the study proposes a theoretical mechanism of "Generative AI intervention → reconstruction of the creative process → changes in subjectivity," illustrating how AI platforms reshape creative control, identity perception, and aesthetic decision-making. These findings provide theoretical insights into human–machine collaborative creativity and practical guidance for designing AI art platforms that enhance user autonomy, support diverse cultural expressions, and optimize mechanisms for creative identity.
    번역하기

    With the rapid application of Generative AI technologies in image generation, style transfer, and creative assistance, the process and logic of artistic creation are undergoing a profound transformation. However, research on how AI art platforms influ...

    With the rapid application of Generative AI technologies in image generation, style transfer, and creative assistance, the process and logic of artistic creation are undergoing a profound transformation. However, research on how AI art platforms influence creators' subjectivity remains limited, and few studies have systematically examined users' real-world experiences. To bridge this gap, this study investigated three representative AI art platforms — Midjourney, Runway ML, and Stable Diffusion —using a mixed-methods approach that integrates grounded theory and the CRITIC method. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 experienced AI art practitioners between March and May 2025, and a theoretical framework comprising three core categories, 12 main categories, and 29 initial categories was constructed through grounded theory coding. Building on these findings, we distributed a structured questionnaire using a 7-point Likert scale to 426 participants from June to August 2025, and we quantitatively evaluated the relative importance of the main categories using CRITIC analysis. The results showed that control over expressive outcomes (w₁ = 0.106) and technical accessibility of model customization (w₉ = 0.103) were the two highest-weighted factors, indicating that creators prioritize autonomy and usability in AI-mediated art-making. In contrast, aspects such as cultural bias in training data and algorithmic transparency received lower weights, reflecting a limited awareness of structural issues in AI systems. Synthesizing the qualitative and quantitative findings, the study proposes a theoretical mechanism of "Generative AI intervention → reconstruction of the creative process → changes in subjectivity," illustrating how AI platforms reshape creative control, identity perception, and aesthetic decision-making. These findings provide theoretical insights into human–machine collaborative creativity and practical guidance for designing AI art platforms that enhance user autonomy, support diverse cultural expressions, and optimize mechanisms for creative identity.

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼