RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    부동산투자회사 활성화를 위한 제도개선방안- 설립사례분석을 중심으로 - = A System Improvement Plan for Vitality of Real Estate Investment Trusts- Focusing on Establishment Case Study -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106020811

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    1. CONTENTS
    (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
    Korean government offered new commodities for the capital market to assist the national economy and the problems of real estate in a realistic method. To reduce risks, the government also introduced the REITs〈Real Estate Investment Trusts), the system’s foundation in the United States, which has been in effect since July of 2001. The Korean REITs are divided into two parts : the general REITs which allow unlimited investment in all sectors of real estate ; and Corporate Restructuring (CR) REITs which limit investments of real estate from the restructuring of corporations.
    After the implementation of the REITs, the establishment of CR REITs has been active and new companies are being pursued. There has not been any establishments of the general REITs. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to analyze the problems of the current REITs system and to sublate the current system which leans only on establishment of CR REITs.
    (2) RESEARCH METHOD
    By distinguishing the general REITs and CR REITs of the Korean REITs system, this study will compare them and analyze the establishment cases. It will also determine the current point of the general REITs reasons for the establishment failures and results of the establishment cases.
    (3) RESEARCH RESULTS
    Compared to the CR REITs, the general REITs have failed in public participation due to problems with establishment, property operations, and the tax system.
    2. RESULTS
    First, for a successful REITs system, not only should the CR REITs, which applies to the real estate from restructuring of corporations, but, also, the general REITs, which invests in real estate, must be vitalized.
    Second, for the vitality of the general REITs, there must be alleviations and improvements in the establishment system, property operation system, and others. There must also be a measure taken for establishment capital amount, company establishment methods, company establishment forms, development businesses, loans, and so on.
    Third, in relation to the tax system, the tax system of the general REITs should be the same as that of the CR REITs.
    번역하기

    1. CONTENTS (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Korean government offered new commodities for the capital market to assist the national economy and the problems of real estate in a realistic method. To reduce risks, the government also introduced the REITs〈Real...

    1. CONTENTS
    (1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
    Korean government offered new commodities for the capital market to assist the national economy and the problems of real estate in a realistic method. To reduce risks, the government also introduced the REITs〈Real Estate Investment Trusts), the system’s foundation in the United States, which has been in effect since July of 2001. The Korean REITs are divided into two parts : the general REITs which allow unlimited investment in all sectors of real estate ; and Corporate Restructuring (CR) REITs which limit investments of real estate from the restructuring of corporations.
    After the implementation of the REITs, the establishment of CR REITs has been active and new companies are being pursued. There has not been any establishments of the general REITs. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to analyze the problems of the current REITs system and to sublate the current system which leans only on establishment of CR REITs.
    (2) RESEARCH METHOD
    By distinguishing the general REITs and CR REITs of the Korean REITs system, this study will compare them and analyze the establishment cases. It will also determine the current point of the general REITs reasons for the establishment failures and results of the establishment cases.
    (3) RESEARCH RESULTS
    Compared to the CR REITs, the general REITs have failed in public participation due to problems with establishment, property operations, and the tax system.
    2. RESULTS
    First, for a successful REITs system, not only should the CR REITs, which applies to the real estate from restructuring of corporations, but, also, the general REITs, which invests in real estate, must be vitalized.
    Second, for the vitality of the general REITs, there must be alleviations and improvements in the establishment system, property operation system, and others. There must also be a measure taken for establishment capital amount, company establishment methods, company establishment forms, development businesses, loans, and so on.
    Third, in relation to the tax system, the tax system of the general REITs should be the same as that of the CR REITs.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Akerson, "The Internal Rate of Returns in Real Estate Investments The influence of corporate focus and capital structure on corporate The evidence from REITs Southern Illinois at Carbondale Investing in REITs The University of Alabama Shareholder returns in mergers and acquisitions The case of real estate investment trusts The University of Connecticut ?Portfolio characteristics and net asset valuses in REITs Canadian Journal of Economics Three Essays on REITs and financial Markets University of North Texas The Control and Pricing of Agency Costs in Real Estate Investment Trusts ?Essays on Real Estate Investment Trusts University of New Orleans Understanding REITs in North America KDI school-KAMCO International Workshop on REITs Three essays on real estate investment trusts return and risk The University of Connecticut A Union of Theory and Practice? Pricing and Capital Structure Issues of Real Estate Investment Trusts The University of Connecticut" Bloomberg Press The Florida State University McGraw-Hill Golden Gate University 1998. alshimmire1999. capozza1998. horng1999. nag1998.

    1 Akerson, "The Internal Rate of Returns in Real Estate Investments The influence of corporate focus and capital structure on corporate The evidence from REITs Southern Illinois at Carbondale Investing in REITs The University of Alabama Shareholder returns in mergers and acquisitions The case of real estate investment trusts The University of Connecticut ?Portfolio characteristics and net asset valuses in REITs Canadian Journal of Economics Three Essays on REITs and financial Markets University of North Texas The Control and Pricing of Agency Costs in Real Estate Investment Trusts ?Essays on Real Estate Investment Trusts University of New Orleans Understanding REITs in North America KDI school-KAMCO International Workshop on REITs Three essays on real estate investment trusts return and risk The University of Connecticut A Union of Theory and Practice? Pricing and Capital Structure Issues of Real Estate Investment Trusts The University of Connecticut" Bloomberg Press The Florida State University McGraw-Hill Golden Gate University 1998. alshimmire1999. capozza1998. horng1999. nag1998.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (계속평가)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2019-12-01 등재 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
    2018-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-01-01 등재 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 2.61 2.61 1.87
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.49 1.25 0.704 0.38
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼