RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Factors Affecting the Onset of Economic Sanctions

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104888877

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study argues that a state’s power is best conceptualized by considering how a state interacts with all other states in different networks within the international system. This social network explanation for national power is applied to economic sanctions, one of the most widely studied empirical phenomena in international relations, focusing on power explanations. The evidence from the empirical analysis of economic sanctions during the Cold War period shows that dyads with highly asymmetric national power seem to be less likely to be involved in economic sanctions. As power preponderance theorists argue, power preponderance will preserve peace because it reduces the uncertainties of prospective winners and losers in a dispute. The evidence from nonparametric model discrimination statistics and information criteria measures also shows that the sanctions models with new social network power measures have greater explanatory power than or statistically outperform models relying on attributional power measures, such as Correlates of War index and GNP.
    번역하기

    This study argues that a state’s power is best conceptualized by considering how a state interacts with all other states in different networks within the international system. This social network explanation for national power is applied to economic...

    This study argues that a state’s power is best conceptualized by considering how a state interacts with all other states in different networks within the international system. This social network explanation for national power is applied to economic sanctions, one of the most widely studied empirical phenomena in international relations, focusing on power explanations. The evidence from the empirical analysis of economic sanctions during the Cold War period shows that dyads with highly asymmetric national power seem to be less likely to be involved in economic sanctions. As power preponderance theorists argue, power preponderance will preserve peace because it reduces the uncertainties of prospective winners and losers in a dispute. The evidence from nonparametric model discrimination statistics and information criteria measures also shows that the sanctions models with new social network power measures have greater explanatory power than or statistically outperform models relying on attributional power measures, such as Correlates of War index and GNP.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, "War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives" Yale University Press 1992

    2 Heckman, James J., "Varieties of Selection Bias" 80 (80): 313-318, 1990

    3 Borgatti, S. P., "Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis"

    4 Drury, A. Cooper, "U.S. Presidents and the Use of Economic Sanctions" 30 (30): 623-642, 2000

    5 Vella, Francis, "Two-Step Estimation of Panel Data Models with Censored Endogenous Variables and Selection Bias" 90 : 239-263, 1999

    6 Russett, Bruce M., "Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations" Norton 2001

    7 Stolzenberg, Ross M., "Tools for Intuition about Sample Selection Bias and Its Correction" 62 (62): 494-507, 1997

    8 Leyton-Brown, David, "The Utility of International Economic Sanctions" Croom Helm 1987

    9 Smith, Alistair, "The Success and Use of Economic Sanctions" 21 (21): 229-245, 1996

    10 Drezner, Daniel W., "The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations" Cambridge University Press 1999

    1 Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, "War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives" Yale University Press 1992

    2 Heckman, James J., "Varieties of Selection Bias" 80 (80): 313-318, 1990

    3 Borgatti, S. P., "Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis"

    4 Drury, A. Cooper, "U.S. Presidents and the Use of Economic Sanctions" 30 (30): 623-642, 2000

    5 Vella, Francis, "Two-Step Estimation of Panel Data Models with Censored Endogenous Variables and Selection Bias" 90 : 239-263, 1999

    6 Russett, Bruce M., "Triangulating Peace: Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations" Norton 2001

    7 Stolzenberg, Ross M., "Tools for Intuition about Sample Selection Bias and Its Correction" 62 (62): 494-507, 1997

    8 Leyton-Brown, David, "The Utility of International Economic Sanctions" Croom Helm 1987

    9 Smith, Alistair, "The Success and Use of Economic Sanctions" 21 (21): 229-245, 1996

    10 Drezner, Daniel W., "The Sanctions Paradox: Economic Statecraft and International Relations" Cambridge University Press 1999

    11 Baldwin, David A., "The Sanctions Debate and the Logic of Choice" 24 (24): 80-107, 1999

    12 Drezner, Daniel W., "The Hidden Hand of Economic Coercion" 57 (57): 643-650, 2003

    13 Puhani, Patrick A., "The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique? A Short Survey" 41 (41): 53-68, 2000

    14 Elliott, Kimberly Ann, "The Effectiveness of Economic Sanctions with Application to the Case of Iraq" 5 (5): 403-409, 1993

    15 Lektzian, David, "The Economic Peace and Democracies: Economic Sanctions and Domestic Institutions" 40 (40): 641-660, 2003

    16 Kim, Hyung Min, "The Classical Liberals Were Half Right (or Half Wrong): New Tests of the Liberal Peace, 1960-88" 42 (42): 523-543, 2005

    17 Bennett, D. Scott, "The Behavioral Origins of War" University of Michigan Press 2004

    18 Clarke, Kevin A., "Testing Nonnested Models of International Relations: Reevaluating Realism" 45 (45): 724-744, 2001

    19 Clarke, Kevin A., "Testing Nonnested Models of International Relations" University of Michigan. 2001

    20 Bergeijk, Peter A. G. van, "Success and Failure of Economic Sanctions" 42 (42): 385-404, 1989

    21 Raftery, A. E., "Sociological Methodology" Basil Blackwell 1996

    22 Wellman, B., "Social Structures: A Network Approach" Cambridge University Press 1988

    23 Kim, Hyung Min, "Social Network Conceptualizations of International System Structure and National Power: A Social Network Perspective on International Relations" University of North Carolina 2007

    24 Wasserman, Stanley, "Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications" Cambridge University Press 1994

    25 Scott, John, "Social Network Analysis: A Handbook" SAGE Publications 2000

    26 Vella, Francis, "Simple Tests for Sample Selection Bias in Censored and Discrete Choice Models" 7 (7): 413-421, 1992

    27 Akaike, H., "Second International Symposium on Information Theory" Akademiai Kiado 1973

    28 Greene, William H., "Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error: A Comment" 49 (49): 795-798, 1981

    29 Heckman, James J., "Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error" 47 (47): 153-162, 1979

    30 Blake, Charles H., "Reconsidering the Effectiveness of International Economic Sanctions: An Examination of Selection Bias" 43 (43): 133-149, 2006

    31 Conover, W. J., "Practical Nonparametric Statistics" John Wiley 1980

    32 Dashti-Gibson, Jaleh, "On the Determinants of the Success of Economic Sanctions: An Empirical Analysis" 41 (41): 608-618, 1997

    33 Clarke, Kevin A, "Nonparametric Model Discrimination in International Relations" 47 (47): 72-93, 2003

    34 Knoke, David, "Network Analysis" Sage Publications 1982

    35 Borgatti, S.P., "Models of Core / Periphery Structures" 21 : 375-395, 1999

    36 Winship, Christopher, "Models for Sample Selection Bias" 18 : 327-350, 1992

    37 Nooruddin, Irfan, "Modeling Selection Bias in Studies of Sanctions Efficacy" 28 (28): 59-75, 2002

    38 Oneal, John R., "Measuring Interdependence and Its Pacific Benefits: A Response to Gartzke & Li" 40 (40): 721-725, 2003

    39 Gibler, Douglas M., "Measuring Alliances: The Correlates of War Formal Interstate Alliance Dataset, 1816–2000" 41 (41): 211-222, 2000

    40 Barbieri, Katherine, "Measure for Mis-measure: A Response to Gartzke & Li" 40 (40): 713-719, 2003

    41 Gartzke, Erik, "Measure for Measure: Concept Operationalization and the Trade Interdependence-Conflict Debate" 40 (40): 553-572, 2003

    42 Drury, A. Copper, "MIDs, Economic Sanctions, and Trade: The Effect of Economic Coercion on Military Disputes" 2004

    43 Degenne, Alain, "Introducing Social Networks" SAGE 1999

    44 Doxey, Margaret P., "International Sanctions in Contemporary Perspective" St. Martin’s Press 1987

    45 Mansfield, Edward D., "International Institutions and Economic Sanctions" 47 (47): 575-605, 1995

    46 Losman, Donald L., "International Economic Sanctions: the Cases of Cuba, Israel, and Rhodesia" University of New Mexico Press 1979

    47 Martin, Lisa L., "Institutions and Cooperation: Sanctions during the Falkland Islands Conflict" 16 (16): 143-178, 1992

    48 Sweeney, Kevin J., "Implementing and Interpreting Sample Selection Models [online]"

    49 Morgan, T. Clifton, "Fools Suffer Gladly: The Use of Economic Sanctions in International Crises" 41 (41): 27-50, 1997

    50 Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, "Expanded Trade and GDP Data. Version 4.1"

    51 Gleditsch, Kristian Skrede, "Expanded Trade and GDP Data" 46 (46): 712-724, 2002

    52 Ellings, Richard J., "Embargoes and World Power: Lessons from American Foreign Policy" Westview Press 1985

    53 Goenner, Cullen F., "Economic War and Democratic Peace" 24 (24): 171-182, 2007

    54 Baldwin, David A., "Economic Statecraft" Princeton University Press 1985

    55 Lam, San Ling, "Economic Sanctions and the Success of Foreign Policy Goals: A Critical Evaluation" 2 (2): 239-248, 1990

    56 Sandoval-Bustos, Rosa Eugenia, "Economic Sanctions and Interdependence" 2004

    57 Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, "Economic Sanctions Reconsidered" Institute for International Economics 1990

    58 Greene, William H., "Econometric Analysis" Prentice Hall 2003

    59 Bennett, D. Scott, "EUGene: A Conceptual Manual" 26 : 179-204, 2000

    60 Drury, A. Cooper, "Democracy, Autocracy, and Economic Sanctions: How Regime Type Affects the Use of Economic Coercion" 2003

    61 Hart, Robert A., "Democracy and the Successful Use of Economic Sanctions" 53 (53): 267-284, 2000

    62 Dixon, William J., "Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict" 88 (88): 14-32, 1994

    63 Drezner, Daniel W., "Conflict Expectations and Paradox of Economic Coercion" 42 (42): 709-731, 1998

    64 Kim, Hyung Min, "Comparing Measures of National Power" 31 (31): 405-427, 2010

    65 Freeman, Linton, "Centrality in Valued Graphs: A Measure of Betweenness Based on Network Flow" 13 : 141-154, 1991

    66 Freeman, Linton, "Centrality in Social Networks: Conceptual Clarification" 1 : 215-239, 1978

    67 Croco, Sarah, "Assessing the Dyadic Approach to Interstate Conflict Processes: A.k.a. ‘Dangerous’ Dyad-Years" 22 (22): 5-18, 2005

    68 Blanchard, Jean-Marc F., "Asking the Right Question: When Do Economic Sanctions Work Best?" 9 : 219-253, 2000

    69 Tsebelis, George, "Are Sanctions Effective?: A Game-Theoretic Analysis" 34 (34): 3-28, 1990

    70 Gartzke, Erik, "All”s Well That Ends Well: A Reply to Oneal, Barbieri & Peters" 40 (40): 727-732, 2003

    71 Reed, William, "A Unified Statistical Model of Conflict Onset and Escalation" 44 (44): 84-93, 2000

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2024 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2020-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-04-22 학회명변경 한글명 : 신아세아질서연구회 -> 신아시아연구소 KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-05-30 학술지등록 한글명 : 신아세아
    외국어명 : NEW ASIA
    KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.72 0.72 0.61
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.47 0.44 1.035 0.07
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼