RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    SSCI SCIE SCOPUS KCI등재

    임부의 강인성과 산전간호이행과의 관계연구

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A3027293

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this correlational study was to offer strategies for nursing intervention to improve compliance with prenatal care.
    This study was designed to investigate degree of hardiness, correlation between hardiness and compliance with prenatal care.
    In research, the characteristic of hardiness has been demonstrated in resolving stressful situations and in adapting to overcome physical and psychological tension, pregnancy is normal crisis process. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate degree of hardiness in normal pregnant woman and I think that concept of hardiness is able to become a new, important concept for prenatal care intervention.
    The subjects were 388 normal pregnant woman over five months, who were selected from five university hospitals and two health centers in Taegu.
    Data were obtained using a convenience sample technique.
    Data collection was done from March 6 to June 18. 1992.
    The instruments used for this study were the Health Related Hardiness Scale developed by Pollock(1984) and compliance with a prenatal care scale developed by the author on the basis of results of a literature review.
    Data were analyzed using the SAS program for t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe test, Pearson correlation and stepwise multiple regression.
    The results are as follows:
    1. The scores on the hardiness scale ranged from 35 to 210 with mean of 88.89.
    2. The scores on the compliance with prenatal care scale ranged from 28 to 140 with a mean of 111.49.
    3. There were significant differences between hardiness and obstetrical characteristic factors, duration of pregnancy, frequency of pregnancy. frequency of abortion(P◎.05).
    4. There were significant differences between compliance with prenatal care and general and obstetircal characteristic factors, education and frequency of pregnancy(P◎.05).
    5. Correlations between hardiness and compliance with prenatal care were all negative and significant(r=-.2276∼-.2930, P◎.000).
    Challenge of hardiness components was the lowest(r=-.2814).
    6. Significant differences between hardiness and compliance with prenatal care by group were as follows:
    Group 1 was the highest, whereas Group 8 was the lowest(F=5.47, P◎.0000).
    7. Factors influencing compliance with prenatal care were:
    1) Challenge was the main variable and accounted for 7.92% of the total variance.
    2) Education and frequency of pregnancy accounted for an additional 2.74% of the total variance.
    From the above findings, this study suggests the following:
    1) Considering the lack of empirical support, the theroy of hardiness needs to be evaluated.
    2) A valid, reliable and culturally appropriate instrument needs to be developed for Health Related Hardiness Scale.
    3) There is a need for further study of hardiness in a broad variety of populations.
    4) There is a need for comparative study coorrelation between hardiness and compliance with prenatal care in woman with normal and abnormal pregnancies.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this correlational study was to offer strategies for nursing intervention to improve compliance with prenatal care. This study was designed to investigate degree of hardiness, correlation between hardiness and compliance with prenatal ...

    The purpose of this correlational study was to offer strategies for nursing intervention to improve compliance with prenatal care.
    This study was designed to investigate degree of hardiness, correlation between hardiness and compliance with prenatal care.
    In research, the characteristic of hardiness has been demonstrated in resolving stressful situations and in adapting to overcome physical and psychological tension, pregnancy is normal crisis process. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate degree of hardiness in normal pregnant woman and I think that concept of hardiness is able to become a new, important concept for prenatal care intervention.
    The subjects were 388 normal pregnant woman over five months, who were selected from five university hospitals and two health centers in Taegu.
    Data were obtained using a convenience sample technique.
    Data collection was done from March 6 to June 18. 1992.
    The instruments used for this study were the Health Related Hardiness Scale developed by Pollock(1984) and compliance with a prenatal care scale developed by the author on the basis of results of a literature review.
    Data were analyzed using the SAS program for t-test, ANOVA, Scheffe test, Pearson correlation and stepwise multiple regression.
    The results are as follows:
    1. The scores on the hardiness scale ranged from 35 to 210 with mean of 88.89.
    2. The scores on the compliance with prenatal care scale ranged from 28 to 140 with a mean of 111.49.
    3. There were significant differences between hardiness and obstetrical characteristic factors, duration of pregnancy, frequency of pregnancy. frequency of abortion(P◎.05).
    4. There were significant differences between compliance with prenatal care and general and obstetircal characteristic factors, education and frequency of pregnancy(P◎.05).
    5. Correlations between hardiness and compliance with prenatal care were all negative and significant(r=-.2276∼-.2930, P◎.000).
    Challenge of hardiness components was the lowest(r=-.2814).
    6. Significant differences between hardiness and compliance with prenatal care by group were as follows:
    Group 1 was the highest, whereas Group 8 was the lowest(F=5.47, P◎.0000).
    7. Factors influencing compliance with prenatal care were:
    1) Challenge was the main variable and accounted for 7.92% of the total variance.
    2) Education and frequency of pregnancy accounted for an additional 2.74% of the total variance.
    From the above findings, this study suggests the following:
    1) Considering the lack of empirical support, the theroy of hardiness needs to be evaluated.
    2) A valid, reliable and culturally appropriate instrument needs to be developed for Health Related Hardiness Scale.
    3) There is a need for further study of hardiness in a broad variety of populations.
    4) There is a need for comparative study coorrelation between hardiness and compliance with prenatal care in woman with normal and abnormal pregnancies.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼