RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      중국 지방차원의 지재권 보호 딜레마 -정책순응과 침해묵인 사이의 선택에 관한 탐색적 연구- = Chinese Local Governments` Dilemma over the Monitoring of IPR Infringement -An Exploratory Study of Choice between Policy Compliance and Infringement Connivance-

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99845799

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      This paper is an exploratory study of the Chinese local government`s dilemma over the protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs). To provide the rationale and local-level sources of the recurring IPRs infringement phenomena in China, this study adopts game theoretic framework to explain conceptually the choice between policy compliance and infringement connivance motives of local governments. Realistically assuming information asymmetry between central and provincial governments on the one hand, and between lower-level local governments and local enterprises under their jurisdiction on the other, this study finds that one of the most important factors that affect the IPRs infringement at local level is ``localism cum local protectionism,`` in which local governments put priority on their local economic interest often sacrificing the objective of central government to catch up with the global technological level and to comply with the TRIPs requirement of the WTO agreement. Under the multi-layered decentralized setting, local governments have strong incentive not to strictly execute the IPR laws and regulations, deliberately overlooking the deviant behaviors of local enterprises. In the process, the interests of the central government are sacrificed, but the central government with inferior information, has no effective means to control and penalize local governments. Only when domestic and international environment convinces local party cadres of the ``tough guy`` stance of the central government, they try to observe the IPR laws and regulations. Yet whenever central control is loosened, local leaders choose not to comply with the central directions and laws. Their motivations are diverse: to win the growth (rate) race with the neighboring and/or peer local governments, to expand local employment & revenues, to improve export performance, etc. Local power elites` moral hazards, rent-seeking corruption practices using personal connection (guanxi) with infiltrators, coupled with insufficient crackdown cooperation among local governments, make the IPR protection situation at local level even worse. This paper has shortcomings. To provide conclusive evidence to support the conceptual framework presented in this paper, multiple regression analysis should be carried out in the future, using regional panel data on independent and/or control variables that affect both central monitoring decisions and localism practices.
      번역하기

      This paper is an exploratory study of the Chinese local government`s dilemma over the protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs). To provide the rationale and local-level sources of the recurring IPRs infringement phenomena in China, this study...

      This paper is an exploratory study of the Chinese local government`s dilemma over the protection of intellectual property rights (IPRs). To provide the rationale and local-level sources of the recurring IPRs infringement phenomena in China, this study adopts game theoretic framework to explain conceptually the choice between policy compliance and infringement connivance motives of local governments. Realistically assuming information asymmetry between central and provincial governments on the one hand, and between lower-level local governments and local enterprises under their jurisdiction on the other, this study finds that one of the most important factors that affect the IPRs infringement at local level is ``localism cum local protectionism,`` in which local governments put priority on their local economic interest often sacrificing the objective of central government to catch up with the global technological level and to comply with the TRIPs requirement of the WTO agreement. Under the multi-layered decentralized setting, local governments have strong incentive not to strictly execute the IPR laws and regulations, deliberately overlooking the deviant behaviors of local enterprises. In the process, the interests of the central government are sacrificed, but the central government with inferior information, has no effective means to control and penalize local governments. Only when domestic and international environment convinces local party cadres of the ``tough guy`` stance of the central government, they try to observe the IPR laws and regulations. Yet whenever central control is loosened, local leaders choose not to comply with the central directions and laws. Their motivations are diverse: to win the growth (rate) race with the neighboring and/or peer local governments, to expand local employment & revenues, to improve export performance, etc. Local power elites` moral hazards, rent-seeking corruption practices using personal connection (guanxi) with infiltrators, coupled with insufficient crackdown cooperation among local governments, make the IPR protection situation at local level even worse. This paper has shortcomings. To provide conclusive evidence to support the conceptual framework presented in this paper, multiple regression analysis should be carried out in the future, using regional panel data on independent and/or control variables that affect both central monitoring decisions and localism practices.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 유진석, "한중 지재권 분쟁의 현황과 대응" 삼성경제연구소 1-23, 2007

      2 김희동, "중국발 짝퉁, 애플 넘어 세계 최고 브랜드 등극할까"

      3 강승호, "중국 지방정부의 렌트추구와 성장패턴" 한국동북아경제학회 23 (23): 135-162, 2011

      4 성시일, "중국 재정정책의 변화가경제에 미친 영향" 한국중국문화학회 22 (22): 1-17, 2006

      5 한국지식재산연구원, "중국 ‘2012년 국가지식산권 전략실시 추진계획’의 주요내용 및 시사점"

      6 "미-중 지재권 분쟁조짐"

      7 "미-중 불법복제 관련 무역전쟁 위기. 5. 10"

      8 "미 중 지재권 분쟁 극적타결"

      9 "극적 타결, 중-미 지재권 협상. 6. 19"

      10 "新京報"

      1 유진석, "한중 지재권 분쟁의 현황과 대응" 삼성경제연구소 1-23, 2007

      2 김희동, "중국발 짝퉁, 애플 넘어 세계 최고 브랜드 등극할까"

      3 강승호, "중국 지방정부의 렌트추구와 성장패턴" 한국동북아경제학회 23 (23): 135-162, 2011

      4 성시일, "중국 재정정책의 변화가경제에 미친 영향" 한국중국문화학회 22 (22): 1-17, 2006

      5 한국지식재산연구원, "중국 ‘2012년 국가지식산권 전략실시 추진계획’의 주요내용 및 시사점"

      6 "미-중 지재권 분쟁조짐"

      7 "미-중 불법복제 관련 무역전쟁 위기. 5. 10"

      8 "미 중 지재권 분쟁 극적타결"

      9 "극적 타결, 중-미 지재권 협상. 6. 19"

      10 "新京報"

      11 "WIPO Statistics Database"

      12 Mertha, A., "The Politics of Piracy: Intellectual Property in Contemporary China" Cornell University Press 2005

      13 Fishman, T. C., "Manufaketure" 2005

      14 "For China, Spending Is Harder Than It Looks" 15 : 2-5, 2013

      15 Balfour, F., "Fakes" 3919 : 54-64, 2005

      16 Boyarski., J. R., "China Touts Intellectual Property Enforcement Efforts" 21-22, 2001

      17 Tabata, Y., "Anti-Counterfeits Activities by Japanese Companies in China"

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.39 0.39 0.41
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.35 0.34 0.553 0.31
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼