RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      근대초극론, 아직 끝나지 않은 공영권총력전

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A75053959

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      In relation with the theory of overcoming modern, we should notice that the overcoming-theorists of modern stipulate the Greater East Asia War as the Common Sphere's All-out War beyond totalized war. This notion generates an unusual imperialism. In discussing the specific relationship between Japan and China which is represented as Manchuria, they emphasize that the relationship is different from the imperialistic relationship based on the existing nationalism. The relationship of Japan and China is very special one through the intermediation of a sphere of life, they say, which is different from the past imperialistic relationship based on the constant of the resources and market. Also, the overcoming-theorists extend the space notion into the field of life, relating internally the space notion at the end of Japanese ruling with historical value beyond the just geographical relation. And thus, in comparison with the fact that the expansion history of European imperialism is a specific world history heightgning the dependency on the outer region of Europe, they set up the relation of Japan and China not as a subjunctive one but as an equal one, describing their relationship as that of sphere of life. This setting is a kind of mythomania for joining the East Asia's nations into the Greater East Asia War.
      Goyama Iwao said that, from the view of world history, Japan's position on China is not imperialistic. This thinking is common thinking of Japanese at that time. The advance of Japan into the East Asia is a mission in the history of world, that is, Japan's stopping from China's split, and also, the only means that Asia can go beyond the restriction of position in the history of world. These thinkings are an universal level of recognition of Japanese at that time.
      Because such universal thinking is in the deep heart of Japanese, 'Ideal of the Greater East Asia War', Japanese believes, justifies the past relationship of Japan and China. If we can call the power which can make Japanese have such thinking 'morallish-energie', a moral principle of the overcoming-theorists of modern is a very specific philosophical logic. They insist that the Japan's measures on China are different from those of the western imperialism because they overcome imperialism ideally just in the case of Construction of the Greater East Asia, though the measures have a leg 'to be misunderstood as an imperialistic ones'. In the inner heart of their persistence, firm and sometimes gruesome self-confidence or belief reside. That's just the moral power, and the mind of Tenno. Therefore, 'morallish-energie' which the overcoming-theorists of modern assert is a mere philosophical slogan to rationalize the Greater East Asia War.
      번역하기

      In relation with the theory of overcoming modern, we should notice that the overcoming-theorists of modern stipulate the Greater East Asia War as the Common Sphere's All-out War beyond totalized war. This notion generates an unusual imperialism. In di...

      In relation with the theory of overcoming modern, we should notice that the overcoming-theorists of modern stipulate the Greater East Asia War as the Common Sphere's All-out War beyond totalized war. This notion generates an unusual imperialism. In discussing the specific relationship between Japan and China which is represented as Manchuria, they emphasize that the relationship is different from the imperialistic relationship based on the existing nationalism. The relationship of Japan and China is very special one through the intermediation of a sphere of life, they say, which is different from the past imperialistic relationship based on the constant of the resources and market. Also, the overcoming-theorists extend the space notion into the field of life, relating internally the space notion at the end of Japanese ruling with historical value beyond the just geographical relation. And thus, in comparison with the fact that the expansion history of European imperialism is a specific world history heightgning the dependency on the outer region of Europe, they set up the relation of Japan and China not as a subjunctive one but as an equal one, describing their relationship as that of sphere of life. This setting is a kind of mythomania for joining the East Asia's nations into the Greater East Asia War.
      Goyama Iwao said that, from the view of world history, Japan's position on China is not imperialistic. This thinking is common thinking of Japanese at that time. The advance of Japan into the East Asia is a mission in the history of world, that is, Japan's stopping from China's split, and also, the only means that Asia can go beyond the restriction of position in the history of world. These thinkings are an universal level of recognition of Japanese at that time.
      Because such universal thinking is in the deep heart of Japanese, 'Ideal of the Greater East Asia War', Japanese believes, justifies the past relationship of Japan and China. If we can call the power which can make Japanese have such thinking 'morallish-energie', a moral principle of the overcoming-theorists of modern is a very specific philosophical logic. They insist that the Japan's measures on China are different from those of the western imperialism because they overcome imperialism ideally just in the case of Construction of the Greater East Asia, though the measures have a leg 'to be misunderstood as an imperialistic ones'. In the inner heart of their persistence, firm and sometimes gruesome self-confidence or belief reside. That's just the moral power, and the mind of Tenno. Therefore, 'morallish-energie' which the overcoming-theorists of modern assert is a mere philosophical slogan to rationalize the Greater East Asia War.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 "가메이 카츠이치로" 1943

      2 "<《神皇正統記》의 역사서술의 성격" 한국일본학회 2권 (2권): 2003.6

      1 "가메이 카츠이치로" 1943

      2 "<《神皇正統記》의 역사서술의 성격" 한국일본학회 2권 (2권): 2003.6

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2017-12-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 등재 신청제한 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.24 0.24 0.24
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.24 0.507 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼